• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

别担心生成式人工智能未来可能会损害人类创造力或智力:它已然如此。

Do Not Worry That Generative AI May Compromise Human Creativity or Intelligence in the Future: It Already Has.

作者信息

Sternberg Robert J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2024 Jul 19;12(7):69. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12070069.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence12070069
PMID:39057189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11278271/
Abstract

Technology alters both perceptions of human intelligence and creativity and the actual processes of intelligence and creativity. Skills that were once important for human intelligence, for example, computational ones, no longer hold anywhere near the same importance they did before the age of computers. The advantage of computers is that they may lead us to focus on what we believe to be more important things than what they have replaced. In the case of penmanship, spelling, or arithmetic computation, such an argument could bear fruit. But in the case of human creativity, the loss of creative skills and attitudes may be a long-term loss to humanity. Generative AI is replicative. It can recombine and re-sort ideas, but it is not clear that it will generate the kinds of paradigm-breaking ideas the world needs right now to solve the serious problems that confront it, such as global climate change, pollution, violence, increasing income disparities, and creeping autocracy.

摘要

技术改变了人们对人类智力和创造力的认知,也改变了智力和创造力的实际过程。例如,曾经对人类智力很重要的技能,如计算技能,在计算机时代之后已远不如从前重要。计算机的优势在于,它们可能会引导我们关注那些我们认为比它们所取代的东西更重要的事情。就书法、拼写或算术计算而言,这样的观点可能会有成效。但就人类创造力而言,创造性技能和态度的丧失可能会给人类带来长期损失。生成式人工智能是复制性的。它可以重新组合和重新排列想法,但不清楚它是否会产生当今世界解决所面临的严重问题(如全球气候变化、污染、暴力、收入差距扩大和专制蔓延)所需的那种突破性范式的想法。

相似文献

1
Do Not Worry That Generative AI May Compromise Human Creativity or Intelligence in the Future: It Already Has.别担心生成式人工智能未来可能会损害人类创造力或智力:它已然如此。
J Intell. 2024 Jul 19;12(7):69. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12070069.
2
Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content.生成式人工智能提高了个体创造力,但降低了新颖内容的整体多样性。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jul 12;10(28):eadn5290. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290.
3
Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task.在创造性发散思维任务中,最优秀的人类仍然胜过人工智能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 14;13(1):13601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40858-3.
4
Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence.确立共同创造和自我效能在与人工智能进行创造性协作中的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 9;14(1):18525. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69423-2.
5
How Artificial Intelligence Can Help Us Understand Human Creativity.人工智能如何帮助我们理解人类创造力。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 19;10:1401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01401. eCollection 2019.
6
Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art.生成式人工智能、人类创造力与艺术。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Mar 5;3(3):pgae052. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Creativity in Generative Musical Networks: Evidence From Two Case Studies.生成式音乐网络中的创造力:来自两个案例研究的证据。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Aug 2;8:680586. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.680586. eCollection 2021.
8
Creativity and Artificial Intelligence-A Student Perspective.创造力与人工智能——学生视角
J Intell. 2022 Sep 6;10(3):65. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030065.
9
The Language of Creativity: Evidence from Humans and Large Language Models.创造力的语言:来自人类和大语言模型的证据。
J Creat Behav. 2024 Mar;58(1):128-136. doi: 10.1002/jocb.636. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
10
Generative AI and the future of equality norms.生成式人工智能与平等规范的未来。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105906. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation?游戏设计中的生成式人工智能:是增强创造力还是限制创新?
J Intell. 2025 May 24;13(6):60. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13060060.
2
When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI.当ChatGPT撰写你的研究计划时:生成式人工智能时代的科学创造力
J Intell. 2025 May 16;13(5):55. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13050055.

本文引用的文献

1
AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans.人工智能模型 GPT-3 比人类更能提供信息。
Sci Adv. 2023 Jun 28;9(26):eadh1850. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh1850.
2
Ignac Semmelweis-Father of Hand Hygiene.伊格纳兹·塞麦尔维斯——手卫生之父。
Indian J Surg. 2020 Jun;82(3):276-277. doi: 10.1007/s12262-020-02386-6. Epub 2020 May 21.
3
Exploring strategies to operationalize cognitive reserve: A systematic review of reviews.探索实现认知储备的策略:综述的系统评价
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(3):253-64. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.1002759. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
Three midlife strategies to prevent cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease.预防阿尔茨海默病所致认知障碍的三种中年策略。
Climacteric. 2014 Dec;17 Suppl 2(0 2):38-46. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2014.929650. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
5
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.人类为什么要推理?论证理论的论证。
Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Apr;34(2):57-74; discussion 74-111. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000968.
6
Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference.作为参照系定量理论基础的适应水平。
Psychol Rev. 1948 Nov;55(6):297-313. doi: 10.1037/h0056721.
7
Muscle tissue changes with aging.肌肉组织会随着年龄增长而发生变化。
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004 Jul;7(4):405-10. doi: 10.1097/01.mco.0000134362.76653.b2.
8
Cognitive reserve and lifestyle.认知储备与生活方式。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Aug;25(5):625-33. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.5.625.14576.
9
Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?推理中的个体差异:对理性辩论的影响?
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Oct;23(5):645-65; discussion 665-726. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00003435.
10
The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.归属的需求:对人际依恋的渴望是一种基本的人类动机。
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529.