Suppr超能文献

用于API 20E细菌鉴定系统的补充快速生化检测试剂盒

Supplementary rapid biochemical test panel for the API 20E bacterial identification system.

作者信息

Edinger R C, Migneault P C, Nolte F S

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):1063-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.1063-1065.1985.

Abstract

The API 20E Analytical Profile Index typically suggests three or four conventional biochemical tests to complete the identification of strains either identified to genus only or that have multiple genera consistent with the profile number. We compiled a simple panel of eight rapid (4-h) tests that can substitute for the supplementary biochemical tests recommended by Analytab Products (Plainview, N.Y.). The rapid test panel (RTP) consisted of adonitol, cellobiose, lactose, raffinose, rhamnose, and xylose utilization, lysine decarboxylase activity, and motility. A total of 114 consecutive clinical isolates that required additional tests to complete the identifications were each tested with the complete RTP, as well as with the recommended conventional biochemicals. All discordant identifications were resolved by using an expanded series of conventional biochemical tests. Overall, 110 (96%) strains were identified to the correct genus, and 109 (95%) strains were identified to the correct species by using the RTP, as compared with 105 (92%) identified to the correct genus and 90 (79%) identified to the correct species with the recommended tests. The identifications based on the two supplementary test systems did not agree for 7 (6.1%) strains. Four discrepancies were resolved in favor of the RTP, and three were resolved in favor of the recommended tests. We were unable to identify five (4.4%) strains with the recommended tests and only one (0.9%) with the RTP. A majority (86%) of the test strains were identified to the species level with the RTP after only 4 h of incubation.

摘要

API 20E分析谱索引通常建议进行三到四项传统生化试验,以完成仅鉴定到属或具有与谱编号一致的多个属的菌株的鉴定。我们编制了一个由八项快速(4小时)试验组成的简单组合,可替代Analytab Products公司(纽约州普莱恩维尤)推荐的补充生化试验。快速试验组合(RTP)包括阿东醇、纤维二糖、乳糖、棉子糖、鼠李糖和木糖利用试验、赖氨酸脱羧酶活性试验和动力试验。总共114株需要额外试验来完成鉴定的连续临床分离株,分别用完整的RTP以及推荐的传统生化试验进行检测。所有不一致的鉴定结果都通过使用一系列扩展的传统生化试验得以解决。总体而言,使用RTP,110株(96%)菌株被鉴定到正确的属,109株(95%)菌株被鉴定到正确的种,相比之下,使用推荐试验时,105株(92%)被鉴定到正确的属,90株(79%)被鉴定到正确的种。基于这两种补充试验系统的鉴定结果对7株(6.1%)菌株不一致。四项差异的结果支持RTP,三项支持推荐试验。使用推荐试验无法鉴定出5株(4.4%)菌株,而使用RTP仅无法鉴定出1株(0.9%)。大多数(86%)试验菌株在培养仅4小时后就通过RTP鉴定到种水平。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验