Izard D, Husson M O, Vincent P, Leclerc H, Monget D, Boeufgras J M
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jul;20(1):51-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.1.51-54.1984.
A study was conducted to compare the API Rapid 20E 4-h system (API System S.A., France; commercially available in the U.S.A. under the name DMS Rapid E System; DMS Laboratories, Darts Mill, Flemington, N.J.), the API 20E 18- to 24-h system (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.), and a conventional media system to measure the ability of each to identify members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison tables rather than simple percentage agreement tables were generated to define the particular strengths and weaknesses of each system and to allow the laboratory to best use the data. The Rapid 20E compared quite favorably with conventional media. It yielded correct identifications with 95.9% of the isolates tested (API 20E, 98% identification rate). In 2.5% of the isolates, the Rapid 20E gave only genus identifications, and in 1.4% the organisms did not correspond to any key in the code book and could not be identified by the manufacturer's computer service. The ease of inoculation and the 4-h capability make the Rapid 20E system an extremely attractive development in the field of bacterial identification.
开展了一项研究,以比较API Rapid 20E 4小时系统(法国API System S.A.;在美国以DMS Rapid E系统之名上市销售;DMS Laboratories,位于新泽西州弗莱明顿的达茨米尔)、API 20E 18至24小时系统(纽约州普莱恩维尤的Analytab Products)以及一种传统培养基系统,以测定它们各自鉴定肠杆菌科成员的能力。生成的是比较表而非简单的百分比一致表,以界定每个系统的具体优势和劣势,并让实验室能够最佳地利用这些数据。Rapid 20E与传统培养基相比表现相当出色。对95.9%的测试菌株做出了正确鉴定(API 20E的鉴定率为98%)。在2.5%的菌株中,Rapid 20E仅给出了属的鉴定结果,在1.4%的菌株中,菌株与编码手册中的任何关键信息均不匹配,制造商的计算机服务无法对其进行鉴定。接种简便以及4小时出结果的能力使得Rapid 20E系统成为细菌鉴定领域极具吸引力的一项进展。