Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 25;14(7):e085398. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085398.
Increasingly, healthcare and public health strategists invite us to look at healthcare organisations as not just care providers but as anchor institutions (ie, large community-rooted organisations with significant impact in the local economy, social fabric and overall community well-being). In response, this study explores the mechanisms through which healthcare organisations can impact social determinants of health and communities in their local areas.
We conducted case studies with interviews and synthesised the findings using a realist approach to produce a set of explanations (programme theory) of how healthcare organisations can have a positive impact on the overall well-being of local communities by operating as anchor institutions.
Secondary healthcare organisations in England, including mental health and community services.
Staff from case study sites which were directly employed or actively engaged in the organisation's anchor institution strategy. Data collection took place from early June to the end of August 2023.
We found four building blocks for effective anchor activity including employment, spending, estates and sustainability. Healthcare organisations-as anchor institutions-can improve the social determinants of health for their local communities through enabling accessible paths for local community recruitment and career progression; empowering local businesses to join supply chains boosting income and wealth; transforming organisational spaces into community assets; and supporting local innovation and technology to achieve their sustainability goals. These blocks need to be integrated across organisations on the basis of a population health approach promoted by supportive leadership, and in collaboration with a diverse range of local partners.
Healthcare organisations have the potential for a positive impact on the overall well-being of local communities. Policymakers should support healthcare organisations to leverage employment, spending, estates and sustainability to help address the unequal distribution of the social determinants of health.
越来越多的医疗保健和公共卫生策略制定者邀请我们将医疗保健组织不仅视为医疗服务提供者,而且还视为锚定机构(即,在当地经济、社会结构和整体社区福祉方面具有重大影响的大型社区扎根组织)。有鉴于此,本研究探讨了医疗保健组织如何能够影响其当地地区的健康社会决定因素和社区的机制。
我们采用案例研究方法进行访谈,并使用现实主义方法综合研究结果,提出了一套关于医疗保健组织如何通过作为锚定机构对当地社区的整体福祉产生积极影响的解释(方案理论)。
英格兰的二级医疗保健组织,包括心理健康和社区服务。
来自案例研究现场的工作人员,他们直接受雇于或积极参与组织的锚定机构战略。数据收集于 2023 年 6 月初至 8 月底进行。
我们发现了四个有效锚定活动的构建块,包括就业、支出、房地产和可持续性。医疗保健组织作为锚定机构,可以通过为当地社区的招聘和职业发展提供可及途径,增强当地企业加入供应链以提高收入和财富,将组织空间转变为社区资产,以及支持当地创新和技术实现可持续性目标,从而改善当地社区的健康社会决定因素。这些模块需要基于支持性领导倡导的人口健康方法,在与各种当地合作伙伴合作的基础上,在组织内部进行整合。
医疗保健组织有可能对当地社区的整体福祉产生积极影响。政策制定者应支持医疗保健组织利用就业、支出、房地产和可持续性来帮助解决健康社会决定因素的不平等分配问题。