• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤患者的功能优先事项:沙特阿拉伯的观点。

Functional priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a Saudi Arabian perspective.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Qatar Rehabilitation Institute, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2024 Sep;62(9):539-545. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-01018-0. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1038/s41393-024-01018-0
PMID:39060481
Abstract

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are the deciding force behind the rehabilitation program to improve their quality of life (QoL) based on their personal preferences. Here we aimed to determine the preferences perceived most vital by Saudi SCI population to improve their QoL, and explore if these preferences are affected by gender, education, and duration, level, or extent of injury.

DESIGN

Participants ranked seven priorities of bodily functions as Rank I-VII with "I" being "Most important," and "VII" being "Least important."

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation facility.

PARTICIPANTS

120 participants (>18 years of age) of either sex with SCI without polytrauma, acquired brain injury, neurodegenerative disease, and dementia.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Ranking scale of seven priorities of bodily functions as Rank I-VII with "I" being "Most important," and "VII" being "Least important."

RESULTS

Of 101 individuals (mean age: 35.2 ± 14.8 years) finally included, 70.3% were males, 66.3% had onset of SCI since ≥ 3 years, 48.5% had a complete injury, and 75% had paraplegia. Most (26.7%) participants ranked walking as the first priority followed by hand/arm function (20.8%). Sexual function was the least important priority (39.6%). Hand/arm function was significantly more important for individuals with tetraplegia (p < 0.001). Trunk strength and balance was significantly less important for individuals with complete injury (p = 0.037). Participants with the onset of injury < 3 years and a complete injury reported bladder/bowel function as significantly more important (p = 0.011). Walking was significantly more important for people with incomplete injury and for people with injury duration ≥ 3 years (p = 0.022, p = 0.002 respectively).

CONCLUSION

The top priority in our sample of Saudi people with SCI was walking followed by hand/arm function while the least desired function was regaining sexual function. Walking was a prioritized function for people with injury duration ≥ 3 years and people with a complete injury while hand/arm function was highly prioritized by people with tetraplegia.

摘要

背景/目的:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者是康复计划的决策力量,旨在根据个人偏好提高生活质量(QoL)。本研究旨在确定沙特 SCI 患者认为对改善 QoL 最重要的优先事项,并探讨这些偏好是否受到性别、教育程度、损伤的时间、水平或程度的影响。

设计

参与者将身体功能的七个优先级排序为 Rank I-VII,其中“I”为“最重要”,“VII”为“最不重要”。

地点

住院康复设施。

参与者

120 名(年龄>18 岁)非创伤性 SCI 患者,无多发创伤、获得性脑损伤、神经退行性疾病和痴呆。

结果测量

身体功能七个优先级的排序量表,Rank I-VII,其中“I”为“最重要”,“VII”为“最不重要”。

结果

最终纳入 101 名个体(平均年龄:35.2±14.8 岁),其中 70.3%为男性,66.3%的 SCI 发病时间≥3 年,48.5%为完全损伤,75%为截瘫。大多数(26.7%)参与者将行走列为第一优先级,其次是手/臂功能(20.8%)。性功能是最不重要的优先级(39.6%)。四肢瘫痪患者的手/臂功能明显更重要(p<0.001)。完全损伤患者的躯干力量和平衡明显不重要(p=0.037)。发病时间<3 年和完全损伤的参与者报告膀胱/肠道功能更重要(p=0.011)。行走对不完全损伤患者和损伤时间≥3 年的患者更为重要(p=0.022,p=0.002)。

结论

我们的沙特 SCI 患者样本中,首要任务是行走,其次是手/臂功能,而最不理想的功能是恢复性功能。行走是发病时间≥3 年和完全损伤患者的优先功能,而四肢瘫痪患者更重视手/臂功能。

相似文献

1
Functional priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a Saudi Arabian perspective.脊髓损伤患者的功能优先事项:沙特阿拉伯的观点。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Sep;62(9):539-545. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-01018-0. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Clinical Subsets of Central Cord Syndrome: Is It a Distinct Entity from Other Forms of Incomplete Tetraplegia for Research?中央索综合征的临床亚型:它是否是与其他形式不完全四肢瘫痪不同的研究实体?
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Sep;41(17-18):2133-2145. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0613. Epub 2024 May 9.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
7
Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.成人中枢神经系统疾病患者大便失禁和便秘的管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 18(12):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub4.
8
Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.成人中枢神经系统疾病患者粪便失禁和便秘的管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 13;2014(1):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub5.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Invasive urodynamic investigations in the management of women with refractory overactive bladder symptoms: FUTURE, a superiority RCT and economic evaluation.侵入性尿动力学检查在难治性膀胱过度活动症女性患者管理中的应用:FUTURE,一项优效性随机对照试验及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(27):1-139. doi: 10.3310/UKYW4923.

引用本文的文献

1
Tissue bridges offer valuable insights into bladder and bowel outcomes in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.组织桥接为慢性颈脊髓损伤患者的膀胱和肠道预后提供了有价值的见解。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09322-w.

本文引用的文献

1
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019.《脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:2019年修订版》
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Spring;27(2):1-22. doi: 10.46292/sci2702-1.
2
Priorities of desired functional recovery in Indian spinal cord injury patients.印度脊髓损伤患者期望的功能恢复优先事项。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Sep-Oct;11(5):896-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation After Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury Enables Volitional Movement in the Absence of Stimulation.
慢性完全性脊髓损伤后的长期脊髓刺激可在无刺激情况下实现自主运动。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jun 30;14:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00035. eCollection 2020.
4
Exoskeleton Walk Training in Paralyzed Individuals Benefits From Transcutaneous Lumbar Cord Tonic Electrical Stimulation.瘫痪个体的外骨骼行走训练受益于经皮腰髓强直电刺激。
Front Neurosci. 2020 May 25;14:416. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00416. eCollection 2020.
5
Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-analysis.机器人辅助步态训练对脊髓损伤患者的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 21;2020:2102785. doi: 10.1155/2020/2102785. eCollection 2020.
6
Recovery target priorities of people with spinal cord injuries in Korea compared with other countries: a survey.韩国与其他国家脊髓损伤患者的康复目标优先级比较:一项调查。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Sep;58(9):998-1003. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0457-z. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
The feasibility of using exoskeletal-assisted walking with epidural stimulation: a case report study.使用外骨骼辅助行走和硬膜外刺激的可行性:案例报告研究。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Feb;7(2):259-265. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50983. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
8
Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation for Lower Limb Motor Function Recovery in Individuals with Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓硬膜外刺激对运动完全性脊髓损伤患者下肢运动功能恢复的作用
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019 May;30(2):337-354. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
Functional Priorities in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Using Discrete Choice Experiments To Determine Preferences.脊髓损伤患者的功能优先级:运用离散选择实验确定偏好
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Nov 1;33(21):1958-1968. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4423. Epub 2016 May 9.
10
Updates for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.《脊髓损伤神经分类国际标准》的更新内容。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014 Aug;25(3):505-17, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.04.001.