Suppr超能文献

过度弯曲马的颈部:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Hyperflexing the horse's neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

König von Borstel Uta, Kienapfel Kathrin, McLean Andrew, Wilkins Cristina, McGreevy Paul

机构信息

Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Section Animal Husbandry, Behaviour and Welfare, University of Giessen, Leihgesterner Weg 52, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

Group Equids, Swiss national stud farm, Les Longs Pres, Agroscope, Avenches, 1580, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 2;14(1):22886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72766-5.

Abstract

The article reports a meta-analysis of 58 peer-reviewed studies investigating on dorsoventral hyperflexion of the neck in horses, a practice under substantial public and scientific scrutiny for the past two decades. The following databases were last searched on 28.05.2023: CAB, Google Scholar, Web of Science, NAL/Agricola, PubMed and ScienceDirect. After evaluating the conclusions of each study, we performed statistical analyses to establish a consensus on welfare and performance (performance marks, kinematics and musculoskeletal) outcomes in horses performing with a hyperflexed head and neck posture (HNP). The analysis revealed that a significant majority of the articles (75% of n = 36; Z = 3.00; P>|Z|=0.0027) expressed concerns about the welfare of horses working in this posture. Parameters such as dressage training level, prior experience, duration, and method of achieving the hyperflexed posture did not influence welfare concern conclusions significantly (P > 0.1). Therefore, it appears that the practice impairs welfare regardless of how it is imposed. A concurrent assessment of the weight of evidence for performance benefits showed inconclusive results: approximately one-quarter of the studies showed benefits and one-quarter detrimental effects, while the largest proportion (44%) showed no significant effect on performance. On balance, it appears that the costs associated with hyperflexed HNPs exceed potential benefits.

摘要

本文报道了一项对58项同行评审研究的荟萃分析,这些研究调查了马的颈部背腹过度弯曲情况,在过去二十年中,这种做法受到了公众和科学界的大量审视。以下数据库于2023年5月28日进行了最新检索:CAB、谷歌学术、科学网、NAL/农业文献数据库、PubMed和ScienceDirect。在评估每项研究的结论后,我们进行了统计分析,以就头部和颈部过度弯曲姿势(HNP)的马匹的福利和性能(性能评分、运动学和肌肉骨骼)结果达成共识。分析显示,绝大多数文章(n = 36中的75%;Z = 3.00;P>|Z| = 0.0027)对以这种姿势工作的马的福利表示担忧。盛装舞步训练水平、先前经验、持续时间和实现过度弯曲姿势的方法等参数对福利担忧结论没有显著影响(P > 0.1)。因此,无论如何实施这种做法,似乎都会损害福利。对性能益处的证据权重的同时评估显示结果尚无定论:约四分之一的研究显示有益处,四分之一显示有不利影响,而最大比例(44%)显示对性能没有显著影响。总体而言,似乎与头部和颈部过度弯曲相关的成本超过了潜在益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ce/11446961/f08b9b045993/41598_2024_72766_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验