• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利非特异性下背痛患者样本中罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷简版的信度、同时效度及临床性能

Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Clinical Performances of the Shorter Version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in a Sample of Italian People with Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

作者信息

Paolucci Teresa, Pezzi Letizia, Coraci Daniele, Tognolo Lucrezia, Pantalone Andrea, Attanasi Carmine, Graziani Giancarlo, Dalla Costa Davide, Arippa Federico, Cichelli Alice, Monticone Marco

机构信息

Department of Oral, Medical and Biotechnological Sciences (DSMOB), Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Study "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Rehabilitation Unit, ASST Cremona-Ospedale di Cremona, Viale Concordia, 1, 26100 Cremona, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):740. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070740.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14070740
PMID:39063994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11277590/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the psychometric and clinical performances of the RM-18, the shorter version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), in Italian people with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) as a time-saving and clinically useful method of assessing disability.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 74 people (52 females and 22 males, 53.03 ± 15.25 years old) with NSLBP. The RM-18, the RMQ, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS) were administered. Psychometric testing included reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest measurement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC2.1), and concurrent validity by comparing the RM-18 with the RMQ and the ODI (Pearson's r correlation). Two separate regression analyses were performed to investigate the different impact of RM-18 and RMQ on NRS.

RESULTS

Cronbach's α of RM-18 was 0.92 and ICC (2,1) = 0.96. Strong correlations were found with the RMQ and the ODI (r = 0.98; r = 0.78, respectively). The regression models showed that the RM-18 and the RMQ similarly impacted the NRS ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The RM-18 showed satisfactory psychometric testing and similarly impacted the NRS when compared to the RMQ. It can be recommended for clinical and research purposes in Italian people with NSLBP.

摘要

背景

评估罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷(RMQ)的简短版本RM - 18在意大利非特异性下腰痛(NSLBP)患者中的心理测量学和临床性能,作为一种节省时间且对评估残疾具有临床实用性的方法。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了74例NSLBP患者(52例女性和22例男性,年龄53.03±15.25岁)。采用了RM - 18、RMQ、奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)和疼痛强度数字评定量表(NRS)。心理测量测试包括通过内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数)和重测测量(组内相关系数,ICC2.1)评估可靠性,以及通过将RM - 18与RMQ和ODI进行比较(皮尔逊r相关性)评估同时效度。进行了两项独立的回归分析,以研究RM - 18和RMQ对NRS的不同影响。

结果

RM - 18的克朗巴哈α系数为0.92,ICC(2,1)= 0.96。与RMQ和ODI发现强相关性(分别为r = 0.98;r = 0.78)。回归模型显示,RM - 18和RMQ对NRS的影响相似(<0.001)。

结论

RM - 18显示出令人满意的心理测量测试结果,与RMQ相比,对NRS的影响相似。对于意大利NSLBP患者的临床和研究目的,它是值得推荐的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d20/11277590/18e6b178bb90/jpm-14-00740-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d20/11277590/18e6b178bb90/jpm-14-00740-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d20/11277590/18e6b178bb90/jpm-14-00740-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Clinical Performances of the Shorter Version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in a Sample of Italian People with Non-Specific Low Back Pain.意大利非特异性下背痛患者样本中罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷简版的信度、同时效度及临床性能
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):740. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070740.
2
Validation of the Hungarian version of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷匈牙利语版本的验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(1):86-90. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.909536. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
3
The Italian version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in patients with chronic low back pain.魁北克腰痛残疾量表的意大利版本:在慢性腰痛患者中的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Mar;29(3):530-539. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06153-4. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
4
Assessing self-reported disability in a low-literate population with chronic low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of Igbo Roland Morris disability questionnaire.在低文化背景的慢性腰痛人群中评估自我报告的残疾:伊博 Roland Morris 残疾问卷的跨文化适应和心理测量学测试。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Apr;41(8):948-957. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1416185. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Validation of the Roland Morris Questionnaire in Colombia to Evaluate Disability in Low Back Pain.罗兰·莫里斯问卷在哥伦比亚用于评估腰痛所致残疾的效度验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jul 15;40(14):1108-14. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000963.
6
Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.意大利版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI-I)的开发:一项跨文化适应、信效度研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b.
7
The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Italian version in people with chronic low back pain.《弗里曼特尔背部感知问卷》:意大利版在慢性下背痛人群中的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 11;25(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07420-2.
8
Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain.哥伦比亚低腰痛患者 Oswestry 残疾问卷的验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):E1730-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184.
9
Development of the Italian version of the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire in patients with chronic low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity.慢性下腰痛患者疼痛变化阶段问卷意大利语版的开发:跨文化调适、验证性因素分析、信度和效度
Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Sep;37(3):205-11. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000056.
10
Development of the Italian Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability and Validity.慢性下腰痛患者疼痛警觉与意识问卷意大利语版的编制:跨文化调适、验证性因素分析、信度与效度
Int J Behav Med. 2016 Apr;23(2):214-23. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9507-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Infiltrations Combined with Early Rehabilitation in the Management of Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study.超声引导下浸润联合早期康复治疗腰痛的有效性:一项回顾性观察研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;14(18):2087. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182087.

本文引用的文献

1
Shorter and sweeter: the 16-item version of the SRS questionnaire shows better structural validity than the 20-item version in young patients with spinal deformity.更简短、更甜美:在脊柱畸形的年轻患者中,SRS 问卷的 16 项版本比 20 项版本具有更好的结构有效性。
Spine Deform. 2022 Sep;10(5):1055-1062. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00509-5. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Low back pain definitions: effect on patient inclusion and clinical profiles.腰痛的定义:对患者纳入及临床特征的影响。
Pain Rep. 2022 Mar 22;7(2):e997. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000997. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
3
Are patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) useful in low back pain? Experiences of physiotherapists in primary health care in Sweden.
患者报告结局测量(PROMs)在腰痛中有用吗?瑞典初级保健中物理治疗师的经验。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Oct;55:102414. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102414. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
4
Clinical guidelines and care pathway for management of low back pain with or without radicular pain.伴有或不伴有神经根性疼痛的下腰痛管理临床指南及护理路径
Joint Bone Spine. 2021 Dec;88(6):105227. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105227. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
Slacklining as therapy to address non-specific low back pain in the presence of multifidus arthrogenic muscle inhibition.在多裂肌关节源性肌肉抑制的情况下,使用松弛线疗法治疗非特异性下腰痛。
World J Orthop. 2021 Apr 18;12(4):178-196. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i4.178.
6
Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies.样本量、功效和效应量再探:临床前、临床和实验室研究中简化而实用的方法。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
7
The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients.在与患者的医疗接触中使用患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和共同决策:为患者提供基于价值的医疗服务的契机。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):524-540. doi: 10.1111/jep.13321. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
8
Current use of PROMs and factors associated with their use in patients with nonspecific low back pain.患者特异性结局测量(PROMs)在非特异性下腰痛患者中的当前应用及其相关影响因素
Learn Health Syst. 2019 Jun 28;3(4):e10194. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10194. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review.患者报告结局测量数据:能否用于为个体患者做出决策?一项叙述性综述。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jul 29;10:233-241. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S156291. eCollection 2019.
10
Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain - a survey among primary health care physiotherapists.临床评估和患者报告的腰痛结局测量 - 初级保健物理治疗师的调查。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Oct;41(20):2459-2467. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1467503. Epub 2018 May 9.