Suppr超能文献

在多裂肌关节源性肌肉抑制的情况下,使用松弛线疗法治疗非特异性下腰痛。

Slacklining as therapy to address non-specific low back pain in the presence of multifidus arthrogenic muscle inhibition.

作者信息

Gabel Charles Philip, Mokhtarinia Hamid Reza, Melloh Markus, Mateo Sébastien

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Access Physiotherapy, Coolum Beach 4573, QLD, Australia.

Department of Ergonomics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran 0001, Iran.

出版信息

World J Orthop. 2021 Apr 18;12(4):178-196. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i4.178.

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) represents the most prevalent, problematic and painful of musculoskeletal conditions that affects both the individual and society with health and economic concerns. LBP is a heterogeneous condition with multiple diagnoses and causes. In the absence of consensus definitions, partly because of terminology inconsistency, it is further referred to as non-specific LBP (NSLBP). In NSLBP patients, the lumbar multifidus (MF), a key stabilizing muscle, has a depleted role due to recognized myocellular lipid infiltration and wasting, with the potential primary cause hypothesized as arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI). This link between AMI and NSLBP continues to gain increasing recognition. To date there is no 'gold standard' or consensus treatment to alleviate symptoms and disability due to NSLBP, though the advocated interventions are numerous, with marked variations in costs and levels of supportive evidence. However, there is consensus that NSLBP management be cost-effective, self-administered, educational, exercise-based, and use multi-modal and multi-disciplinary approaches. An adjuvant therapy fulfilling these consensus criteria is 'slacklining', within an overall rehabilitation program. Slacklining, the neuromechanical action of balance retention on a tightened band, induces strategic indirect-involuntary therapeutic muscle activation exercise incorporating spinal motor control. Though several models have been proposed, understanding slacklining's neuro-motor mechanism of action remains incomplete. Slacklining has demonstrated clinical effects to overcome AMI in peripheral joints, particularly the knee, and is reported in clinical case-studies as showing promising results in reducing NSLBP related to MF deficiency induced through AMI (MF-AMI). Therefore, this paper aims to: rationalize why and how adjuvant, slacklining therapeutic exercise may positively affect patients with NSLBP, due to MF-AMI induced depletion of spinal stabilization; considers current understandings and interventions for NSLBP, including the contributing role of MF-AMI; and details the reasons why slacklining could be considered as a potential adjuvant intervention for NSLBP through its indirect-involuntary action. This action is hypothesized to occur through an over-ride or inhibition of central down-regulatory induced muscle insufficiency, present due to AMI. This subsequently allows neuroplasticity, normal neuro-motor sequencing and muscle re-activation, which facilitates innate advantageous spinal stabilization. This in-turn addresses and reduces NSLBP, its concurrent symptoms and functional disability. This process is hypothesized to occur through four neuro-physiological processing pathways: finite neural delay; movement-control phenotypes; inhibition of action and the innate primordial imperative; and accentuated corticospinal drive. Further research is recommended to investigate these hypotheses and the effect of slacklining as an adjuvant therapy in cohort and control studies of NSLBP populations.

摘要

腰痛(LBP)是肌肉骨骼疾病中最普遍、最棘手且最疼痛的一种,它在健康和经济方面给个人和社会都带来了影响。腰痛是一种具有多种诊断结果和病因的异质性疾病。由于缺乏共识定义,部分原因是术语不一致,它进一步被称为非特异性腰痛(NSLBP)。在NSLBP患者中,腰椎多裂肌(MF)作为关键的稳定肌肉,由于公认的肌细胞脂质浸润和萎缩而发挥的作用减弱,其潜在的主要病因被假设为关节源性肌肉抑制(AMI)。AMI与NSLBP之间的这种联系越来越受到认可。迄今为止,尚无缓解NSLBP所致症状和残疾的“金标准”或共识性治疗方法,尽管提倡的干预措施众多,在成本和支持证据水平上存在显著差异。然而,人们一致认为NSLBP的管理应具有成本效益、可自我实施、具有教育性、基于运动,并采用多模式和多学科方法。在整体康复计划中,一种符合这些共识标准的辅助治疗方法是“走扁带”。走扁带是在拉紧的带子上保持平衡的神经机械作用,它诱发了包含脊髓运动控制的策略性间接非自愿治疗性肌肉激活运动。尽管已经提出了几种模型,但对走扁带的神经运动作用机制的理解仍不完整。走扁带已被证明在克服外周关节尤其是膝关节的AMI方面具有临床效果,并且在临床案例研究中报告显示在减少与AMI诱导的MF缺乏相关的NSLBP(MF - AMI)方面有令人鼓舞的结果。因此,本文旨在:阐明辅助性走扁带治疗运动为何以及如何可能对因MF - AMI导致脊柱稳定功能丧失的NSLBP患者产生积极影响;考虑目前对NSLBP的理解和干预措施,包括MF - AMI的促成作用;详细说明为何走扁带可因其间接非自愿作用而被视为NSLBP的潜在辅助干预措施。这种作用被假设是通过超越或抑制由于AMI而存在的中枢下调诱导的肌肉功能不足而发生的。这随后允许神经可塑性、正常的神经运动序列和肌肉重新激活,从而促进天生有利的脊柱稳定。这反过来解决并减少了NSLBP及其并发症状和功能残疾。这个过程被假设通过四个神经生理处理途径发生:有限的神经延迟;运动控制表型;动作抑制和天生的原始指令;以及增强的皮质脊髓驱动。建议进一步研究以调查这些假设以及走扁带作为辅助治疗在NSLBP人群的队列研究和对照研究中的效果。

相似文献

6
Muscle Control and Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain.肌肉控制与非特异性慢性下腰痛
Neuromodulation. 2018 Jan;21(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/ner.12738. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验