Suppr超能文献

胎儿护理中心以患者为中心的护理差异:PCC-FCC量表美国试点研究的结果。

Differences in Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers: Results from the U.S. Pilot Study of the PCC-FCC Scale.

作者信息

Wilpers Abigail B, Francis Katie, Powne Amy B, Somers Lonnie, Ren Yunyi, Kohari Katherine, Lorch Scott A

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 20;14(7):772. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070772.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We report findings from a U.S. mixed-methods pilot study of the Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers (PCC-FCC) Scale.

METHODS

Participants, who received care at a U.S. Fetal Care Center (FCC) between 2017 and 2021, completed an online questionnaire providing sociodemographic details, specifics about the care received, qualitative experiences, and scores from the PCC-FCC Scale.

RESULTS

Participants' ( = 247) PCC-FCC scores and qualitative feedback indicate high perceived person-centered care (PCC), particularly in areas of care coordination, respectful care, and patient education. However, 8% scored below the midpoint, and 38% of comments were negative, especially regarding expectation setting, preparation for post-intervention maternal health, and psychosocial support. Public insurance was associated with higher total PCC-FCC ( = 0.03) and Factor 2 scores ( = 0.02) compared to those with private insurance. The qualitative themes trust, clarity, comprehensive care, compassion, and belonging further elucidate the concept of PCC in FCCs.

CONCLUSION

The PCC-FCC Scale pilot study revealed strong overall PCC in FCCs, yet variability in patient experiences suggests areas needing improvement, including expectation setting, preparation for post-intervention maternal health, and psychosocial support. Future research must prioritize diverse samples and continued mixed methodologies to better understand the role of insurance and identify other potential disparities, ensuring comprehensive representation of the FCC patient population.

摘要

目的

我们报告一项关于胎儿护理中心以患者为中心的护理(PCC - FCC)量表的美国混合方法试点研究的结果。

方法

2017年至2021年期间在美国胎儿护理中心(FCC)接受护理的参与者完成了一份在线问卷,提供社会人口学细节、所接受护理的具体情况、定性体验以及PCC - FCC量表的得分。

结果

参与者(n = 247)的PCC - FCC得分和定性反馈表明,他们对以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的感知度较高,尤其是在护理协调、尊重护理和患者教育方面。然而,8%的参与者得分低于中点,38% 的评论为负面,特别是在期望设定、干预后产妇健康准备和心理社会支持方面。与拥有私人保险的参与者相比,公共保险与更高的PCC - FCC总分(p = 0.03)和因子2得分(p = 0.02)相关。定性主题信任、清晰、全面护理、同情和归属感进一步阐明了FCC中PCC的概念。

结论

PCC - FCC量表试点研究表明,FCC总体上具有较强的PCC,但患者体验的差异表明仍有需要改进的领域,包括期望设定、干预后产妇健康准备和心理社会支持。未来的研究必须优先考虑多样化的样本和持续的混合方法,以更好地理解保险的作用并识别其他潜在差异,确保全面代表FCC患者群体。

相似文献

9
Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color.发展以人为中心的有色人种产前护理量表。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):427.e1-427.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.216. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验