Cheung Hiu Wah, Geeraert Nicolas, Loaiza Vanessa M
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, United Kingdom.
J Cogn. 2024 Jul 23;7(1):62. doi: 10.5334/joc.390. eCollection 2024.
Feature binding is the process of integrating features, such as colour and shape, into object representations. A persistent question in the literature concerning whether feature binding is an automatic or resource-demanding process may depend on unitisation, that is, whether the to-be-bound information is intrinsic (belonging to) or extrinsic (contextual). Given extensive evidence showing that Easterners may process information more holistically than Westerners, such cultural differences may be useful to understand the fundamental processes of feature binding in visual working memory (WM). Accordingly, we recruited British and Chinese participants to complete a visual WM task wherein to-be-remembered colours were integrated within (i.e., intrinsic binding) or as backgrounds (i.e., extrinsic binding) of to-be-remembered shapes (Experiments 1 and 2). Experiment 2 further investigated the role of prior knowledge in long-term memory to facilitate feature binding in WM. During retrieval, participants decided among three probes: a target, a lure (i.e., recombination of the presented features), and a new colour/shape. Hierarchical Bayesian multinomial processing tree models were fit to the data to estimate parameters representing binding and item memory. The current results suggest that intrinsic and extrinsic binding memory are similar between the two cultural groups, with no prior knowledge benefits for either intrinsic or extrinsic binding for either cultural group. This result conflicts with the Analytic and Holistic framework and suggests that there are no cultural differences or prior knowledge benefits in feature binding.
特征捆绑是将颜色和形状等特征整合到物体表征中的过程。文献中一个长期存在的问题是,特征捆绑是一个自动的还是需要资源的过程,这可能取决于单元化,也就是说,待捆绑的信息是内在的(属于)还是外在的(情境的)。鉴于大量证据表明东方人可能比西方人更全面地处理信息,这种文化差异可能有助于理解视觉工作记忆(WM)中特征捆绑的基本过程。因此,我们招募了英国和中国的参与者来完成一项视觉WM任务,其中要记忆的颜色被整合到要记忆的形状内部(即内在捆绑)或作为其背景(即外在捆绑)(实验1和2)。实验2进一步研究了长期记忆中先验知识在促进WM中特征捆绑方面的作用。在检索过程中,参与者在三个探针中做出决定:一个目标、一个诱饵(即呈现特征的重新组合)和一个新的颜色/形状。将分层贝叶斯多项式处理树模型拟合到数据中,以估计代表捆绑和项目记忆的参数。目前的结果表明,两种文化群体之间内在和外在捆绑记忆相似,两种文化群体在内在或外在捆绑方面都没有先验知识优势。这一结果与分析性和整体性框架相冲突,表明在特征捆绑方面不存在文化差异或先验知识优势。