• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减半可避免的消费者食物浪费的全球环境效益。

The Global Environmental Benefits of Halving Avoidable Consumer Food Waste.

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, PO Box 9518, Leiden 2300 RA, The Netherlands.

Metabolic Institute, Klimopweg 150, Amsterdam 1032 HX, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 6;58(31):13707-13716. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c04140. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c04140
PMID:39072396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11308518/
Abstract

Avoidable consumer food waste (ACFW) is a global environmental issue wasting key resources and causing emissions, especially in high food-producing nations. We trace ACFW to its origin to assess emissions, water use, and land use. We show that ACFW impacts are dominated by commodities like beef, dairy, rice, and wheat. Over 80% of impacts are domestic, but impacts embodied in trade affect a few major food-producing countries under environmental pressure. A 50% reduction in ACFW could save up to 198 Mt CO2eq in emissions, 30 Gm of blue water, and 99 Mha of land. Targeting key commodities in impactful countries (e.g., US beef waste) could achieve significant benefits. Sparing wasted land and returning it to its potential natural vegetation could sequester 26 Gt COeq long-term (17-35 Gt COeq). Finally, while the 50% ACFW reduction lines up with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12.3b for the avoidable portion of food waste, a total of 276 Mt of unavoidable consumer food waste is also generated, which cannot be readily reduced. Achieving a 50% reduction in total food waste would require a 93% reduction in ACFW. Tracking the spatial impacts of ACFW can elucidate the concrete benefits of policies aiming at SDG 12.3b.

摘要

避免的消费者食物浪费(ACFW)是一个全球性的环境问题,浪费了关键资源并导致排放,尤其是在高粮食生产国。我们追溯 ACFW 的起源以评估排放、水和土地利用。我们表明,ACFW 的影响主要由牛肉、奶制品、大米和小麦等商品主导。超过 80%的影响是国内的,但受环境压力影响的少数几个主要粮食生产国所涉及的贸易隐含影响。减少 50%的 ACFW 可以在排放方面节省多达 1.98 亿吨 CO2eq,30 亿吨蓝水和 9900 万公顷土地。针对有影响力的国家的关键商品(例如美国牛肉浪费)可能会带来显著的效益。节约浪费的土地并将其恢复到潜在的自然植被状态,可以长期封存 26 亿吨 COeq(17-35 亿吨 COeq)。最后,虽然 50%的 ACFW 减少与可持续发展目标 12.3b 的避免部分食物浪费相一致,但也产生了 2.76 亿吨无法轻易减少的不可避免的消费者食物浪费。要实现食物浪费总量减少 50%,则需要将 ACFW 减少 93%。跟踪 ACFW 的空间影响可以阐明旨在实现可持续发展目标 12.3b 的政策的具体效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/185d/11308518/10661a0c9ac2/es4c04140_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/185d/11308518/7760c65ea1c1/es4c04140_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/185d/11308518/27e4ee94d7a4/es4c04140_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/185d/11308518/10661a0c9ac2/es4c04140_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/185d/11308518/7760c65ea1c1/es4c04140_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/185d/11308518/27e4ee94d7a4/es4c04140_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/185d/11308518/10661a0c9ac2/es4c04140_0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Global Environmental Benefits of Halving Avoidable Consumer Food Waste.减半可避免的消费者食物浪费的全球环境效益。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 6;58(31):13707-13716. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c04140. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
3
Wasted Food, Wasted Resources? A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Analysis of Food Loss and Waste Generation and Treatment.浪费的食物,浪费的资源?对食物损失和浪费产生及处理的环境影响分析的批判性回顾。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Apr 30;58(17):7240-7255. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c08426. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
New insights in food security and environmental sustainability through waste food management.通过管理废弃食物获得对食品安全和环境可持续性的新认识。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(12):17835-17857. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26462-y. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
Exploring the pathways towards the mitigation of the environmental impacts of food consumption.探索减轻食物消费对环境影响的途径。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 2):150528. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150528. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
6
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Environmental Impacts and Hotspots of Food Losses: Value Chain Analysis of Swiss Food Consumption.环境影响与食物损耗热点:瑞士食物消费价值链分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 3;51(19):11165-11173. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06179. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
8
Environmental and economic implications of recovering resources from food waste in a circular economy.在循环经济中从食物垃圾中回收资源的环境和经济影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 25;693:133516. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.322. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
9
Environmental impacts of food waste: Learnings and challenges from a case study on UK.食品浪费对环境的影响:来自英国案例研究的经验教训和挑战。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jun;76:744-766. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
10
Nexus of food waste and climate change framework: Unravelling the links between impacts, projections, and emissions.粮食浪费与气候变化框架的关联:揭示影响、预测和排放之间的联系。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Mar 1;344:123387. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123387. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Global food loss and waste estimates show increasing nutritional and environmental pressures.全球食物损失和浪费估计显示,其带来的营养和环境压力不断增加。
Nat Food. 2024 Feb;5(2):136-147. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00915-6. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
2
Global food loss and waste embodies unrecognized harms to air quality and biodiversity hotspots.全球粮食损失和浪费体现了对空气质量和生物多样性热点地区未被认识到的危害。
Nat Food. 2023 Aug;4(8):686-698. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00810-0. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Rebound effects could offset more than half of avoided food loss and waste.
回弹效应可能会抵消一半以上避免的粮食损失和浪费。
Nat Food. 2023 Jul;4(7):585-595. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00792-z. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate dividend.仅高收入国家的饮食变化就能带来显著的双重气候红利。
Nat Food. 2022 Jan;3(1):29-37. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00431-5. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Cradle-to-grave emissions from food loss and waste represent half of total greenhouse gas emissions from food systems.食物损失和浪费产生的从摇篮到坟墓的排放量占食品系统温室气体排放总量的一半。
Nat Food. 2023 Mar;4(3):247-256. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00710-3. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Saving food mitigates climate change.节约食物可缓解气候变化。
Nat Food. 2023 Mar;4(3):211-212. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00720-1.
7
Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.食物系统产生的温室气体排放量占全球人为温室气体排放总量的三分之一。
Nat Food. 2021 Mar;2(3):198-209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Rebound effects of food waste prevention: Environmental impacts.食物浪费预防的反弹效应:环境影响。
Waste Manag. 2022 Nov;153:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
9
Climate change impact on major crop yield and water footprint under CMIP6 climate projections in repeated drought and flood areas in Thailand.气候变化对泰国反复干旱和洪泛区主要作物产量和水足迹的影响:CMIP6 气候预估。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 2):150741. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150741. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
Arable lands under the pressure of multiple land degradation processes. A global perspective.耕地承受着多种土地退化过程的压力。全球视角。
Environ Res. 2021 Mar;194:110697. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697. Epub 2021 Jan 8.