Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy, Wageningen University and Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Nat Food. 2024 Feb;5(2):136-147. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00915-6. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
Accurate global food losses and waste (FLW) quantification remains challenging owing to limited harmonized global estimates, a lack of comprehensive quantification approaches and an absence of frameworks for addressing FLW challenges. Here we compile a country-level database that assesses FLW across global value chains and quantifies the nutritional and environmental impact of FLW for 121 countries and 20 composite regions. Between 2004 and 2014, FLW increased by a quarter, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, where increasing nutritional losses of ~550 cal per capita per day impact food security. Growing food imports in high-income countries and fast-growing economies worsened FLW and related environmental footprints in exporting low-income regions. Reducing overconsumption and FLW in high-income countries may have positive effects in middle- and low-income countries, where food exports largely drive farm-level losses. Policies should focus on promoting the profitable reuse of unavoidable FLW while enhancing agricultural production efficiency to improve water use and nutritional security.
由于缺乏统一的全球估计、综合量化方法以及解决粮食损失和浪费问题的框架,准确量化全球粮食损失和浪费(FLW)仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们编制了一个国家级数据库,评估了全球价值链中的粮食损失和浪费情况,并量化了 121 个国家和 20 个综合区域的粮食损失和浪费对营养和环境的影响。2004 年至 2014 年间,粮食损失和浪费增加了四分之一,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲和东南亚,这里人均每天约有 550 卡路里的营养损失,影响了粮食安全。高收入国家和快速增长经济体进口的粮食不断增加,导致出口低收入地区的粮食损失和浪费及其相关的环境足迹恶化。减少高收入国家的过度消费和粮食损失和浪费可能会对中低收入国家产生积极影响,因为这些国家的粮食出口在很大程度上导致了农场层面的损失。政策应侧重于促进对不可避免的粮食损失和浪费的有利再利用,同时提高农业生产效率,以改善水的利用和营养安全。