• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视野障碍(eFOVID)研究的流行病学研究,西澳大利亚,1988-2022 年。报告 1:数据收集和汇总方案。

Epidemiology of Field of Vision Disorders (eFOVID) study, Western Australia, 1988-2022. Report 1: Data collection and aggregation protocol.

机构信息

School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov;52(8):819-832. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14422. Epub 2024 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1111/ceo.14422
PMID:39073299
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerised static visual field testing using dedicated machines such as the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) can assess and track changes in visual field sensitivity. The use of retrospective visual field databases is a novel undertaking, with no studies published utilising large scale population-level data. This study phase developed a method to extract HFA data into a large standardised population-based database including point sensitivity data with additional derived variables.

METHODS

Retrospective, longitudinal, population study of visual field data from people who attended an ophthalmology service and had a HFA field test, in Western Australia, between 1988 and 2022. Raw test data included patient demographic fields, sensitivity readings and test parameters. Calculated fields included reliability scores, and a novel combined reliability score.

RESULTS

There were 606 230 tests for 92 215 study individuals, from 22 ophthalmology practices in metropolitan Perth and three public hospital eye clinics, representing around 85% of the field tests performed by ophthalmologists each year. Raw sensitivity values were available for all tests, and additional descriptors were available for most tests (97.5%-100% of tests) with the exception of data variables retired by the manufacturer.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual field data from 606 230 tests were collated into a single dataset, which is highly representative over a long period of time, for a defined population. This dataset has been linked to other administrative datasets to allow for epidemiological investigation of field of vision disorders.

摘要

背景

使用专用机器(如 Humphrey 视野分析仪 (HFA))进行计算机化静态视野测试,可以评估和跟踪视野敏感度的变化。利用回顾性视野数据库是一项新颖的尝试,目前还没有发表过利用大规模人群数据的研究。本研究阶段开发了一种方法,可将 HFA 数据提取到一个大型标准化人群基础数据库中,其中包括点敏感性数据和其他衍生变量。

方法

这是一项在澳大利亚西部进行的回顾性、纵向、人群视野数据研究,研究对象为 1988 年至 2022 年间在眼科服务机构接受 HFA 视野检查的人群。原始测试数据包括患者人口统计学字段、敏感性读数和测试参数。计算字段包括可靠性评分和一种新的综合可靠性评分。

结果

在 22 家位于珀斯大都市区的眼科诊所和 3 家公立医院眼科诊所中,有 92215 名研究个体进行了 606230 次测试,这代表了每年由眼科医生进行的视野测试的 85%左右。所有测试都提供了原始敏感性值,并且大多数测试(97.5%-100%的测试)都提供了其他描述符,除了制造商退役的数据变量。

结论

将 606230 次测试的视野数据汇总到一个单一的数据集,该数据集在很长一段时间内对特定人群具有高度代表性。该数据集已与其他管理数据集相关联,以允许对视野障碍进行流行病学研究。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of Field of Vision Disorders (eFOVID) study, Western Australia, 1988-2022. Report 1: Data collection and aggregation protocol.视野障碍(eFOVID)研究的流行病学研究,西澳大利亚,1988-2022 年。报告 1:数据收集和汇总方案。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov;52(8):819-832. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14422. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
2
Visual field loss and falls requiring hospitalisation: results from the eFOVID study.视野缺失和因跌倒而需住院治疗的结果:eFOVID 研究结果。
Age Ageing. 2024 Sep 1;53(9). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae191.
3
Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.便携式平板电脑与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的 6 个月纵向比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;190:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
4
Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA.Matrix与Humphrey视野分析仪II和SITA的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 May;92(5):527-36. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000583.
5
Comparing the Nidek MP-1 and Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects.在正常受试者中比较尼德克MP-1和汉弗莱视野分析仪。
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Nov;88(11):1288-97. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31822b3746.
6
Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device.头戴式虚拟现实视野筛查设备的验证。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Feb;29(2):86-91. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415.
7
Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.平板电脑视野计、智能视觉功能分析仪和 Humphrey 视野分析仪的视野计结果比较。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023 Sep-Oct;6(5):509-520. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
8
Peripheral visual field thresholds using Humphrey Field Analyzer program 60-4 in normal eyes.正常眼使用 Humphrey 视野分析仪程序 60-4 的周边视野阈值。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(4):415-21. doi: 10.5301/EJO.2011.6299.
9
Predicting Humphrey 10-2 visual field from 24-2 visual field in eyes with advanced glaucoma.预测晚期青光眼患者的 Humphrey 10-2 视野值与 24-2 视野值的关系。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 May;104(5):642-647. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314170. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
10
A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.《Compass 眼底周边仪与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的比较》
Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual field loss and falls requiring hospitalisation: results from the eFOVID study.视野缺失和因跌倒而需住院治疗的结果:eFOVID 研究结果。
Age Ageing. 2024 Sep 1;53(9). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae191.