• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

各种身体活动领域与总体癌症风险的关联,全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)2007-2018 年。

Association between various physical activity domains and overall cancer risk, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 29;19(7):e0308099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308099. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0308099
PMID:39074131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11285962/
Abstract

PURPOSE

There are very few studies concurrently evaluating the association between multiple physical activity (PA) domains and cancer prevalence. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by investigating the link between multiple PA subdomains [occupational PA (OPA), transportation-related PA (TPA), leisure-time PA (LTPA), and total PA] and the likelihood of cancer.

METHOD

The data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008, 2009-2010, 2011-2012, 2013-2014, 2015-2016, and 2017-2018 were used in this study. Cancers are the primary outcome variable of interest in this study. PA was self- or proxy-reported using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Multivariable logistic regression models were used, adjusted for covariates.

RESULTS

The trend analysis revealed that the prevalence of cancer statistically decreased with the increase in total PA amount. The participants achieving twice the minimum recommended PA guidelines (≥300 minutes) for total PA were 32% [0.68 (0.54, 0.86)] less likely to have cancer. However, significant associations between three PA subdomains (OPA, TPA, and LTPA) and cancers were not found in this study.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant association between any of these three single PA subdomains and cancer prevalence other than total PA. Therefore, this study recommends clinical practice should prioritize promoting comprehensive PA that integrates OPA, TPA, and LTPA to achieve at least 150 minutes per week (i.e. per seven days) initially and progressing towards 300 minutes for optimal cancer prevention.

摘要

目的

很少有研究同时评估多个身体活动(PA)领域与癌症患病率之间的关系。因此,本研究旨在通过调查多个 PA 亚领域[职业 PA(OPA)、交通相关 PA(TPA)、休闲时间 PA(LTPA)和总 PA]与癌症发生可能性之间的联系来填补这一空白。

方法

本研究使用了 2007-2008 年、2009-2010 年、2011-2012 年、2013-2014 年、2015-2016 年和 2017-2018 年国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。在这项研究中,癌症是主要关注的结果变量。PA 使用全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ)自我或代理报告。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,调整了协变量。

结果

趋势分析表明,癌症的患病率随着总 PA 量的增加而呈统计学下降趋势。达到总 PA 最低推荐指南(≥300 分钟)两倍的参与者患癌症的可能性降低 32%[0.68(0.54,0.86)]。然而,本研究未发现三个 PA 亚领域(OPA、TPA 和 LTPA)与癌症之间存在显著关联。

结论

除了总 PA 之外,这些三个单一 PA 亚领域中的任何一个与癌症患病率之间都没有显著关联。因此,本研究建议临床实践应优先促进综合 PA,将 OPA、TPA 和 LTPA 整合在一起,最初每周达到 150 分钟(即每周七天),并逐步达到 300 分钟,以达到最佳的癌症预防效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/22d8a110ee2c/pone.0308099.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/c297da4fa2e7/pone.0308099.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/9c998e2a7ec4/pone.0308099.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/df55466c535c/pone.0308099.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/22d8a110ee2c/pone.0308099.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/c297da4fa2e7/pone.0308099.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/9c998e2a7ec4/pone.0308099.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/df55466c535c/pone.0308099.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ccd/11285962/22d8a110ee2c/pone.0308099.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between various physical activity domains and overall cancer risk, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018.各种身体活动领域与总体癌症风险的关联,全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)2007-2018 年。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 29;19(7):e0308099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308099. eCollection 2024.
2
Diabetes Prevalence by Leisure-, Transportation-, and Occupation-Based Physical Activity Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse U.S. Adults.美国不同种族/族裔成年人基于休闲、交通和职业的体力活动的糖尿病患病率。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jul;42(7):1241-1247. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2432. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
Association of physical activity with MAFLD/MASLD and LF among adults in NHANES, 2017-2020.2017-2020 年 NHANES 中成年人身体活动与 MAFLD/MASLD 和 LF 的关系。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 May;136(9-10):258-266. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02314-0. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
Association of different domains of physical activity with diabetic kidney disease: a population-based study.不同领域的体力活动与糖尿病肾病的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 May 28;15:1364028. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1364028. eCollection 2024.
5
Association of domain-specific physical activity with depressive symptoms: A population-based study.特定领域体力活动与抑郁症状的关联:基于人群的研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 12;66(1):e5. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2350.
6
Associations of occupational and leisure-time physical activity with self-rated health in Korea.韩国职业和休闲体力活动与自评健康的关联。
Prev Med. 2022 May;158:107022. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107022. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Analysis of physical activity and prescription opioid use among US adults: a cross-sectional study.分析美国成年人的身体活动和处方类阿片类药物使用情况:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18220-7.
8
The association between income and leisure-time physical activity is moderated by utilitarian lifestyles: A nationally representative US population (NHANES 1999-2014).收入与闲暇时间体力活动之间的关系受到功利生活方式的调节:一项具有全国代表性的美国人群(NHANES 1999-2014)。
Prev Med. 2018 Aug;113:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 16.
9
Leisure-time physical activity dose-response effects on obesity among US adults: results from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.美国成年人闲暇时间体力活动与肥胖的剂量反应关系:1999-2006 年全国健康与营养调查结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 May;64(5):426-31. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.089680.
10
Interrelations of socioeconomic position and occupational and leisure-time physical activity in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.美国国家健康与营养检查调查中社会经济地位与职业及休闲时间身体活动的相互关系。
J Phys Act Health. 2008 Mar;5(2):229-41. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.2.229.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Physical Activity and Sitting Time Balance Index with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among cancer survivors in the USA: a cohort study.美国癌症幸存者的体力活动与久坐时间平衡指数与全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率的关联:一项队列研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 2;33(7):653. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09709-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity and Cancer: A Current Overview of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Outcomes, and Management.肥胖与癌症:流行病学、发病机制、结局及管理现状综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;15(2):485. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020485.
2
Leisure-time and occupational physical activity and health outcomes in cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病中的休闲时间及职业体力活动与健康结局
Heart. 2023 Apr 12;109(9):686-694. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321474.
3
Correlates and determinants of transport-related physical activity among adults: an interdisciplinary systematic review.
成人交通相关体力活动的相关性因素和决定因素:跨学科系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):1519. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13937-9.
4
Association of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With the Risk of Colorectal Cancer.体力活动与久坐行为与结直肠癌风险的关联。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 May 16;37(19):e158. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e158.
5
Analysis of different domains of physical activity with health-related quality of life in adults: 2-year cohort.分析成年人不同领域的身体活动与健康相关生活质量的关系:一项为期 2 年的队列研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Apr 29;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01981-3.
6
Rethinking physical activity assessment in cancer survivors: a multi-component approach using NHANES data.重新思考癌症幸存者的身体活动评估:使用 NHANES 数据的多组分方法。
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Aug;16(4):781-790. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01072-0. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
Occupational physical activity and cardiovascular disease in the United States.美国的职业体力活动与心血管疾病。
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Oct;78(10):724-730. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106948. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
8
Leisure-time physical activity and its correlates in a multi-ethnic sample of adults over age 50 in Singapore.新加坡50岁以上成年人多民族样本中的休闲体育活动及其相关因素。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10431-6.
9
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.世界卫生组织 2020 年关于身体活动和 sedentary behaviour 的指南。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
10
Do vigorous-intensity and moderate-intensity physical activities reduce mortality to the same extent? A systematic review and meta-analysis.高强度和中等强度的体育活动对降低死亡率的作用程度相同吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Oct 5;6(1):e000775. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000775. eCollection 2020.