Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑联合氯胺酮和阿法沙龙对雌性实验豚鼠的镇静效果()

Sedation Efficacy of Midazolam in Conjunction with Ketamine and Alfaxalone in Female Laboratory Guinea Pigs ().

作者信息

Wharton Keely Nicole, Walsh Courtney A, Haulter Marlena, Ekanayake Dinesh, Ekanayake-Alper Dil

机构信息

Institute of Comparative Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2024 Jul 29;63(5):572-80. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-000028.

Abstract

Guinea pigs have been integral as models used in biomedical research, making significant contributions to nutritional, auditory, immunologic, and hypersensitivity studies, and necessitating the routine need for sedation in laboratory settings. The ketamine-xylazine (KX) combination has been the standard sedation protocol for decades. However, due to the adverse effects and abuse potential of xylazine, this study explores the possibility of substituting xylazine with midazolam and examines the combined use of midazolam with ketamine and alfaxalone in female laboratory guinea pigs. Our findings indicate that KX facilitates the fastest induction and longest duration of sedation compared with other sedatives, including ketamine-midazolam (KM), which, despite its rapid induction, results in significantly shorter sedation durations. KX also ensures a deeper anesthetic depth and greater odds of loss of withdrawal and inguinal reflexes, in contrast to KM and alfaxalone-midazolam (AM), under which only 15% of the animals lost these reflexes. In terms of cardiopulmonary function, KM led to an increased heart rate attributed to elevated sympathetic activity. All 4 sedative protocols lead to respiratory depression, except KM, which causes minimal reduction. Adverse events varied, with 75% of animals experiencing injection site reactions after KX administration and 67% exhibiting regurgitation post-KM administration. No adverse events were reported for the AM combination, suggesting its safer profile. In conclusion, while KX remains the superior protocol for sedation due to its efficiency, reliability, and minimal impact on physiologic parameters, midazolam is not a preferable alternative to replace xylazine. Its increased sympathetic tone, hyperesthesia, and shorter action duration, coupled with a higher potential for adverse events, limit its suitability to combine with ketamine in guinea pig sedation. However, when midazolam is used in conjunction with safer alternatives like alfaxalone, it presents a viable sedation strategy, emphasizing the need for further research into optimizing sedative combinations for laboratory guinea pigs.

摘要

豚鼠一直是生物医学研究中不可或缺的模型,为营养、听觉、免疫和超敏反应研究做出了重大贡献,并且在实验室环境中常规需要进行镇静。氯胺酮-赛拉嗪(KX)组合几十年来一直是标准的镇静方案。然而,由于赛拉嗪的不良反应和滥用可能性,本研究探索了用咪达唑仑替代赛拉嗪的可能性,并研究了咪达唑仑与氯胺酮和阿法沙龙在雌性实验豚鼠中的联合使用。我们的研究结果表明,与其他镇静剂相比,KX促进镇静的诱导最快且持续时间最长,包括氯胺酮-咪达唑仑(KM),尽管其诱导迅速,但镇静持续时间明显较短。与KM和阿法沙龙-咪达唑仑(AM)相比,KX还能确保更深的麻醉深度以及更大的退缩和腹股沟反射消失几率,在KM和AM组中只有15%的动物失去这些反射。在心肺功能方面,KM导致心率增加,这归因于交感神经活动增强。除了KM导致的最小程度降低外,所有4种镇静方案都会导致呼吸抑制。不良事件各不相同,75%的动物在给予KX后出现注射部位反应,67%的动物在给予KM后出现反流。AM组合未报告不良事件,表明其安全性更高。总之,虽然由于KX的效率、可靠性和对生理参数的最小影响,它仍然是镇静的最佳方案,但咪达唑仑不是替代赛拉嗪的理想选择。它增加的交感神经张力、感觉过敏和较短的作用持续时间,再加上更高的不良事件可能性,限制了它与氯胺酮联合用于豚鼠镇静的适用性。然而,当咪达唑仑与更安全的替代品如阿法沙龙联合使用时,它呈现出一种可行的镇静策略,强调需要进一步研究优化实验豚鼠的镇静组合。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验