Suppr超能文献

猫肌肉注射阿法沙龙-美沙酮-咪达唑仑与氯胺酮-美沙酮-咪达唑仑的镇静效果比较

Sedative effects of intramuscular alfaxalone-methadone-midazolam versus ketamine-methadone-midazolam in cats.

作者信息

Te Poele Elles, de Vries Annemarie, de Grauw Janny

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Hamilton Specialist Referrals, Buckinghamshire, UK.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2025 Jan-Feb;52(1):68-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.10.130. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess depth and quality of sedation and the ability to place an intravenous catheter in cats after intramuscular (IM) injection with alfaxalone-methadone-midazolam (AMM) or ketamine-methadone-midazolam (KMM).

STUDY DESIGN

Blinded randomized clinical trial.

ANIMALS

A group of 46 healthy Domestic Short Hair cats.

METHODS

Cats were randomly assigned to be administered IM methadone 0.3 mg kg and midazolam 0.3 mg kg with either alfaxalone 2 mg kg (AMM group, n = 23) or ketamine 3 mg kg (KMM group, n = 23). Before IM injection, a temperament score was assigned. The reaction to injection was scored. After 15 minutes, the depth of sedation was scored using a simple descriptive scale (SDS) and multidimensional sedation score. Success or failure to place an intravenous catheter at first attempt was recorded; p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Cats in the AMM group had a significantly higher median temperament score (p = 0.026). Behavioural reaction to injection with AMM was significantly less compared with KMM (p = 0.016). Median sedation scores were significantly higher in the AMM group than in the KMM group: SDS 4 (0-4) versus 2 (0-4), p = 0.01, respectively; multidimensional sedation score AMM 13 (0-13) versus 3 (0-10), indicating superior sedative effect in the AMM group, p = 0.01. Success rate of catheter placement was significantly higher in the AMM group (18/23) than in the KMM group (10/23), p = 0.033.

CONCLUSIONS

and clinical relevance Addition of 2 mg kg alfaxalone to 0.3 mg kg methadone and 0.3 mg kg midazolam provided better sedation after IM injection than ketamine 3 mg kg combined with the same doses of methadone and midazolam. This combination of drugs may be particularly desirable as an alternative to α- adrenoceptor agonist-based protocols for cats requiring IM sedation.

摘要

目的

评估肌肉注射阿法沙龙-美沙酮-咪达唑仑(AMM)或氯胺酮-美沙酮-咪达唑仑(KMM)后猫的镇静深度和质量,以及放置静脉导管的能力。

研究设计

双盲随机临床试验。

动物

一组46只健康的家养短毛猫。

方法

将猫随机分为两组,分别肌肉注射0.3 mg/kg美沙酮和0.3 mg/kg咪达唑仑,其中一组同时注射2 mg/kg阿法沙龙(AMM组,n = 23),另一组同时注射3 mg/kg氯胺酮(KMM组,n = 23)。在肌肉注射前,记录猫的性情评分。对注射反应进行评分。15分钟后,使用简单描述性量表(SDS)和多维镇静评分对镇静深度进行评分。记录首次尝试放置静脉导管的成功或失败情况;p<0.05。

结果

AMM组猫的性情评分中位数显著更高(p = 0.026)。与KMM组相比,AMM注射后的行为反应显著更少(p = 0.016)。AMM组的镇静评分中位数显著高于KMM组:SDS分别为4(0 - 4)和2(0 - 4),p = 0.01;多维镇静评分AMM为13(0 - 13),KMM为3(0 - 10),表明AMM组的镇静效果更佳,p = 0.01。AMM组导管放置成功率(18/23)显著高于KMM组(10/23),p = 0.033。

结论

临床相关性 与3 mg/kg氯胺酮联合相同剂量的美沙酮和咪达唑仑相比,在0.3 mg/kg美沙酮和0.3 mg/kg咪达唑仑中添加2 mg/kg阿法沙龙肌肉注射后提供了更好的镇静效果。对于需要肌肉注射镇静的猫,这种药物组合可能是基于α-肾上腺素能受体激动剂方案的一种特别理想的替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验