Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Place2Be, London, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2024 Oct 18;109(11):905-912. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326458.
Absence rates remain high in UK schools, with negative implications for attainment, life chances and inequality. Reasons for non-attendance are complex but include psychosocial factors. Few UK-based studies have evaluated psychosocial interventions for school attendance outcomes or its moderators. This pre-post evaluation examined the potential influence of school-based one-to-one counselling on school attendance and possible moderators.
Secondary analysis of routine data, collected by a national mental health provider in primary and secondary schools.
7405 pupils aged 4-19 years, with complete school attendance records at Time1 (pre-counselling term) and Time2 (the term when counselling ended).
All participants received school-based one-to-one counselling with a trained counsellor between August 2016 and December 2019.
Percentage of school sessions attended (continuous) and persistent absence (binary; attending ≤90% of sessions) in a term. Potential moderators included sociodemographics, mental health and school engagement/enjoyment.
Median Time1 attendance was 96%. 23.6% of participants were persistently absent. The intervention was not associated with improved percentage attendance (0.028%, 95% CI -0.160-0.216%) but was associated with 18.5% reduced odds of persistent absence (OR=0.815, 95% CI 0.729-0.911). We identified five moderators of change in attendance (interaction terms p<0.05): age group (improvements for 4-9 s; worsening for 15-19 s), improvement for some ethnicities and lower parent/carer education. Mental health and school engagement/enjoyment co-varied with attendance in expected directions.
One-to-one counselling may improve school attendance among persistently absent pupils, particularly at younger ages. Improving mental health and pupil engagement/enjoyment are potential intervention targets. Our hypotheses require confirmation with controlled designs.
英国学校的缺勤率仍然很高,这对学生的成绩、生活机会和不平等都有负面影响。缺勤的原因很复杂,但包括心理社会因素。英国很少有研究评估过针对学校出勤率结果或其调节因素的心理社会干预措施。本项在前后测评估中,调查了基于学校的一对一咨询对学校出勤率的潜在影响及其调节因素。
由国家精神卫生服务机构在中小学收集的常规数据的二次分析。
7405 名年龄在 4 至 19 岁之间的学生,他们在时间 1(咨询前学期)和时间 2(咨询结束学期)都有完整的学校出勤率记录。
所有参与者在 2016 年 8 月至 2019 年 12 月期间都接受了由经过培训的咨询师提供的基于学校的一对一咨询。
一个学期内参加学校课程的百分比(连续)和持续缺勤(二进制;参加课程的比例≤90%)。潜在的调节因素包括社会人口统计学、心理健康和学校参与/享受程度。
时间 1 的平均出勤率为 96%。23.6%的参与者持续缺勤。该干预措施与出勤率提高无关(0.028%,95%CI-0.160-0.216%),但与持续缺勤的可能性降低 18.5%相关(OR=0.815,95%CI 0.729-0.911)。我们确定了五个与出勤率变化相关的调节因素(交互项 p<0.05):年龄组(4-9 岁的学生有所改善;15-19 岁的学生则恶化)、一些族裔群体的改善以及家长/照顾者教育水平较低。心理健康和学生参与/享受程度与出勤率呈预期方向变化。
一对一咨询可能会改善持续缺勤学生的学校出勤率,特别是在年龄较小的学生中。改善心理健康和学生的参与/享受程度可能是干预的潜在目标。我们的假设需要通过对照设计来证实。