• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赋予护士权力,倡导健康公平并做到公平公正:消除医疗保健中人工智能的偏见,实现公平且负责任的人工智能。

Empowering nurses to champion Health equity & BE FAIR: Bias elimination for fair and responsible AI in healthcare.

作者信息

Cary Michael P, Bessias Sophia, McCall Jonathan, Pencina Michael J, Grady Siobahn D, Lytle Kay, Economou-Zavlanos Nicoleta J

机构信息

Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):130-139. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13007. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1111/jnu.13007
PMID:39075715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11771545/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The concept of health equity by design encompasses a multifaceted approach that integrates actions aimed at eliminating biased, unjust, and correctable differences among groups of people as a fundamental element in the design of algorithms. As algorithmic tools are increasingly integrated into clinical practice at multiple levels, nurses are uniquely positioned to address challenges posed by the historical marginalization of minority groups and its intersections with the use of "big data" in healthcare settings; however, a coherent framework is needed to ensure that nurses receive appropriate training in these domains and are equipped to act effectively.

PURPOSE

We introduce the Bias Elimination for Fair AI in Healthcare (BE FAIR) framework, a comprehensive strategic approach that incorporates principles of health equity by design, for nurses to employ when seeking to mitigate bias and prevent discriminatory practices arising from the use of clinical algorithms in healthcare. By using examples from a "real-world" AI governance framework, we aim to initiate a wider discourse on equipping nurses with the skills needed to champion the BE FAIR initiative.

METHODS

Drawing on principles recently articulated by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, we conducted a critical examination of the concept of health equity by design. We also reviewed recent literature describing the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare as well as their potential for advancing health equity. Building on this context, we describe the BE FAIR framework, which has the potential to enable nurses to take a leadership role within health systems by implementing a governance structure to oversee the fairness and quality of clinical algorithms. We then examine leading frameworks for promoting health equity to inform the operationalization of BE FAIR within a local AI governance framework.

RESULTS

The application of the BE FAIR framework within the context of a working governance system for clinical AI technologies demonstrates how nurses can leverage their expertise to support the development and deployment of clinical algorithms, mitigating risks such as bias and promoting ethical, high-quality care powered by big data and AI technologies.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

As health systems learn how well-intentioned clinical algorithms can potentially perpetuate health disparities, we have an opportunity and an obligation to do better. New efforts empowering nurses to advocate for BE FAIR, involving them in AI governance, data collection methods, and the evaluation of tools intended to reduce bias, mark important steps in achieving equitable healthcare for all.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/060f/11771545/3db1751ab2d2/JNU-57-130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/060f/11771545/3db1751ab2d2/JNU-57-130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/060f/11771545/3db1751ab2d2/JNU-57-130-g001.jpg

背景

设计中的健康公平概念包含多方面的方法,该方法将旨在消除人群群体间有偏见、不公正且可纠正差异的行动作为算法设计的基本要素。随着算法工具在多个层面越来越多地融入临床实践,护士在应对少数群体历史边缘化及其与医疗环境中“大数据”使用的交叉所带来的挑战方面具有独特的地位;然而,需要一个连贯的框架来确保护士在这些领域接受适当的培训并具备有效行动的能力。

目的

我们引入医疗保健领域公平人工智能的偏见消除(BE FAIR)框架,这是一种全面的战略方法,融合了设计中的健康公平原则,供护士在寻求减轻偏见并防止医疗保健中使用临床算法产生歧视性做法时采用。通过使用“现实世界”人工智能治理框架中的示例,我们旨在引发关于使护士具备支持BE FAIR倡议所需技能的更广泛讨论。

方法

借鉴美国卫生信息技术国家协调办公室最近阐明的原则,我们对设计中的健康公平概念进行了批判性审视。我们还回顾了描述人工智能(AI)技术在医疗保健中的风险及其促进健康公平潜力的近期文献。在此背景基础上,我们描述了BE FAIR框架,该框架有可能使护士通过实施治理结构来监督临床算法的公平性和质量,从而在卫生系统中发挥领导作用。然后,我们研究促进健康公平的领先框架,以为BE FAIR在地方人工智能治理框架中的实施提供参考。

结果

BE FAIR框架在临床人工智能技术的有效治理系统背景下的应用表明,护士如何能够利用其专业知识来支持临床算法的开发和部署,减轻诸如偏见等风险,并促进由大数据和人工智能技术推动的符合伦理的高质量护理。

结论与意义

随着卫生系统了解善意的临床算法如何可能使健康差距长期存在,我们有机会也有义务做得更好。使护士能够倡导BE FAIR、让他们参与人工智能治理、数据收集方法以及旨在减少偏见的工具评估的新努力,是实现全民公平医疗保健的重要步骤。

相似文献

1
Empowering nurses to champion Health equity & BE FAIR: Bias elimination for fair and responsible AI in healthcare.赋予护士权力,倡导健康公平并做到公平公正:消除医疗保健中人工智能的偏见,实现公平且负责任的人工智能。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):130-139. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13007. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Translating ethical and quality principles for the effective, safe and fair development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare.将医疗保健领域人工智能技术的有效、安全和公平发展、部署和使用的伦理和质量原则翻译成中文。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):705-713. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad221.
3
Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.基于人工智能的基因组学和用于高通量筛选研究的自动显微镜图像分析中的数据管理与整理实践:推动可靠且符合伦理的人工智能应用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Feb 23;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00716-x.
4
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Health Equity in Oncology: Scoping Review.人工智能对肿瘤学中健康公平性的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 1;24(11):e39748. doi: 10.2196/39748.
5
Building competency in artificial intelligence and bias mitigation for nurse scientists and aligned health researchers.培养护士科学家和相关健康研究人员在人工智能及减轻偏差方面的能力。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 May-Jun;73(3):102395. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102395. Epub 2025 May 2.
6
Imaging Artificial Intelligence: A Framework for Radiologists to Address Health Equity, From the Special Series on DEI.影像人工智能:放射科医生解决健康公平问题的框架,选自多元化、公平性与包容性特刊。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Sep;221(3):302-308. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28802. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
7
Developing Ethics and Equity Principles, Terms, and Engagement Tools to Advance Health Equity and Researcher Diversity in AI and Machine Learning: Modified Delphi Approach.制定伦理与公平原则、术语及参与工具,以促进人工智能和机器学习领域的健康公平及研究人员多样性:改良德尔菲法
JMIR AI. 2023 Dec 6;2:e52888. doi: 10.2196/52888.
8
Advancing Health Equity Through Artificial Intelligence: An Educational Framework for Preparing Nurses in Clinical Practice and Research.通过人工智能推动健康公平:在临床实践和研究中培养护士的教育框架。
Creat Nurs. 2024 May;30(2):154-164. doi: 10.1177/10784535241249193. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
9
AI in Biomedicine-A Forward-Looking Perspective on Health Equity.生物医学中的人工智能——对健康公平性的前瞻性展望。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 10;21(12):1642. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121642.
10
Integrating health equity in artificial intelligence for public health in Canada: a rapid narrative review.将健康公平纳入加拿大公共卫生人工智能领域:一项快速叙述性综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1524616. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1524616. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Algorithmic bias in public health AI: a silent threat to equity in low-resource settings.公共卫生人工智能中的算法偏见:对资源匮乏地区公平性的潜在威胁。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;13:1643180. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1643180. eCollection 2025.
2
Regional Inequities in the Distribution of the Nursing Workforce in Italy.意大利护理劳动力分布的地区不平等现象。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 27;15(7):235. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070235.
3
Leveraging machine learning in nursing: innovations, challenges, and ethical insights.护理领域中机器学习的应用:创新、挑战与伦理洞察。

本文引用的文献

1
Translating ethical and quality principles for the effective, safe and fair development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare.将医疗保健领域人工智能技术的有效、安全和公平发展、部署和使用的伦理和质量原则翻译成中文。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):705-713. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad221.
2
Mitigating Racial And Ethnic Bias And Advancing Health Equity In Clinical Algorithms: A Scoping Review.减轻临床算法中的种族和民族偏见并促进健康公平:范围综述。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Oct;42(10):1359-1368. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00553.
3
What Artificial Intelligence Means for Health Care.
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 23;7:1514133. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1514133. eCollection 2025.
4
Building competency in artificial intelligence and bias mitigation for nurse scientists and aligned health researchers.培养护士科学家和相关健康研究人员在人工智能及减轻偏差方面的能力。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 May-Jun;73(3):102395. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102395. Epub 2025 May 2.
5
Exploring trade-offs in equitable stroke risk prediction with parity-constrained and race-free models.利用平等约束和无种族模型探索公平性中风风险预测中的权衡。
Artif Intell Med. 2025 Jun;164:103130. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103130. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
6
Bridging the Gap: From AI Success in Clinical Trials to Real-World Healthcare Implementation-A Narrative Review.弥合差距:从人工智能在临床试验中的成功到现实世界医疗保健实施——一项叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 22;13(7):701. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070701.
7
Analysing the Suitability of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and the Role of AI Governance.分析人工智能在医疗保健领域的适用性及人工智能治理的作用。
Health Care Anal. 2025 Mar 6. doi: 10.1007/s10728-025-00514-5.
人工智能对医疗保健意味着什么。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jul 7;4(7):e232652. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2652.
4
Awareness of Racial and Ethnic Bias and Potential Solutions to Address Bias With Use of Health Care Algorithms.种族和民族偏见意识,以及使用医疗保健算法解决偏见的潜在方法。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jun 2;4(6):e231197. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1197.
5
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Medicine, 2023.临床医学中的人工智能与机器学习,2023年。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1201-1208. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2302038.
6
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Palliative Care Management: A Scoping Review.临床决策支持系统在姑息治疗管理中的应用:综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):e205-e218. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
7
Predicting daily emergency department visits using machine learning could increase accuracy.使用机器学习预测每日急诊科就诊情况可提高准确性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;65:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.12.019. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
8
Artificial intelligence and end user tools to develop a nurse duty roster scheduling system.用于开发护士值班排班系统的人工智能及终端用户工具。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Jun 16;9(3):373-377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.013. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
A framework for the oversight and local deployment of safe and high-quality prediction models.安全且高质量预测模型的监督和本地部署框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1631-1636. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac078.
10
Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs.消除医疗保健中的显性和隐性偏见:证据和研究需求。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:477-501. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528. Epub 2022 Jan 12.