• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康数据中心可发现性和 FAIR 采用的期望。

Desiderata for discoverability and FAIR adoption of health data hubs.

机构信息

Computational Health Informatics Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, IBiS/Virgen del Rocío University Hospital/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Internal Medicine Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104700. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104700. Epub 2024 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104700
PMID:39079607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The future European Health Research and Innovation Cloud (HRIC), as fundamental part of the European Health Data Space (EHDS), will promote the secondary use of data and the capabilities to push the boundaries of health research within an ethical and legally compliant framework that reinforces the trust of patients and citizens.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyse health data management mechanisms in Europe to determine their alignment with FAIR principles and data discovery generating best. practices for new data hubs joining the HRIC ecosystem. In this line, the compliance of health data hubs with FAIR principles and data discovery were assessed, and a set of best practices for health data hubs was concluded.

METHODS

A survey was conducted in January 2022, involving 99 representative health data hubs from multiple countries, and 42 responses were obtained in June 2022. Stratification methods were employed to cover different levels of granularity. The survey data was analysed to assess compliance with FAIR and data discovery principles. The study started with a general analysis of survey responses, followed by the creation of specific profiles based on three categories: organization type, function, and level of data aggregation.

RESULTS

The study produced specific best practices for data hubs regarding the adoption of FAIR principles and data discoverability. It also provided an overview of the survey study and specific profiles derived from category analysis, considering different types of data hubs.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concluded that a significant number of health data hubs in Europe did not fully comply with FAIR and data discovery principles. However, the study identified specific best practices that can guide new data hubs in adhering to these principles. The study highlighted the importance of aligning health data management mechanisms with FAIR principles to enhance interoperability and reusability in the future HRIC.

摘要

背景

未来的欧洲健康研究与创新云(HRIC)作为欧洲健康数据空间(EHDS)的重要组成部分,将在符合伦理和法律要求的框架内促进数据的二次利用和能力提升,以推动健康研究的边界,从而增强患者和公民的信任。

目的

本研究旨在分析欧洲的健康数据管理机制,以确定其与 FAIR 原则的一致性,并为加入 HRIC 生态系统的新数据中心生成最佳数据发现实践。在此基础上,评估健康数据中心对 FAIR 原则和数据发现的遵守情况,并得出一套健康数据中心的最佳实践。

方法

2022 年 1 月进行了一项调查,涉及来自多个国家的 99 个代表性健康数据中心,2022 年 6 月收到 42 个回复。采用分层方法覆盖不同的粒度级别。对调查数据进行分析,以评估对 FAIR 和数据发现原则的遵守情况。该研究首先对调查回复进行了一般性分析,然后根据组织类型、功能和数据聚合级别创建了特定的档案。

结果

本研究针对采用 FAIR 原则和数据可发现性为数据中心制定了具体的最佳实践,还提供了对调查研究的概述以及基于类别分析得出的特定档案,考虑了不同类型的数据中心。

结论

研究表明,欧洲相当数量的健康数据中心不完全符合 FAIR 和数据发现原则。然而,研究确定了一些具体的最佳实践,这些实践可以指导新的数据中心遵守这些原则。研究强调了使健康数据管理机制与 FAIR 原则保持一致的重要性,以增强未来 HRIC 中的互操作性和可重用性。

相似文献

1
Desiderata for discoverability and FAIR adoption of health data hubs.健康数据中心可发现性和 FAIR 采用的期望。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104700. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104700. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
2
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
5
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health.维生素D对骨骼健康的有效性与安全性。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Aug(158):1-235.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.