Misión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Apartado de Correos 28, 36080, Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain.
Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo (CIAM), Apartado de Correos 10, 15080 A, Coruña, Spain.
Planta. 2024 Jul 30;260(3):66. doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04492-1.
Ants, but not mycorrhizae, significantly affected insect leaf-chewing herbivory on potato plants. However, there was no evidence of mutualistic interactive effects on herbivory. Plants associate with both aboveground and belowground mutualists, two prominent examples being ants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), respectively. While both of these mutualisms have been extensively studied, joint manipulations testing their independent and interactive (non-additive) effects on plants are rare. To address this gap, we conducted a joint test of ant and AMF effects on herbivory by leaf-chewing insects attacking potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants, and further measured plant traits likely mediating mutualist effects on herbivory. In a field experiment, we factorially manipulated the presence of AMF (two levels: control and mycorrhization) and ants (two levels: exclusion and presence) and quantified the concentration of leaf phenolic compounds acting as direct defenses, as well as plant volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions potentially mediating direct (e.g., herbivore repellents) or indirect (e.g., ant attractants) defense. Moreover, we measured ant abundance and performed a dual-choice greenhouse experiment testing for effects of VOC blends (mimicking those emitted by control vs. AMF-inoculated plants) on ant attraction as a mechanism for indirect defense. Ant presence significantly reduced herbivory whereas mycorrhization had no detectable influence on herbivory and mutualist effects operated independently. Plant trait measurements indicated that mycorrhization had no effect on leaf phenolics but significantly increased VOC emissions. However, mycorrhization did not affect ant abundance and there was no evidence of AMF effects on herbivory operating via ant-mediated defense. Consistently, the dual-choice assay showed no effect of AMF-induced volatile blends on ant attraction. Together, these results suggest that herbivory on potato plants responds mainly to top-down (ant-mediated) rather than bottom-up (AMF-mediated) control, an asymmetry in effects which could have precluded mutualist non-additive effects on herbivory. Further research on this, as well as other plant systems, is needed to examine the ecological contexts under which mutualist interactive effects are more or less likely to emerge and their impacts on plant fitness and associated communities.
蚂蚁而非菌根显著影响了马铃薯植株上昆虫的啃食性取食,但两者之间没有表现出互利共生的相互作用。植物与地上和地下的共生体都有联系,两个突出的例子分别是蚂蚁和丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)。虽然这两种共生关系都得到了广泛的研究,但联合操纵以测试它们对植物的独立和交互(非加性)影响的实验却很少。为了解决这一差距,我们联合测试了蚂蚁和 AMF 对啃食马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum)植株叶片的昆虫取食的影响,并进一步测量了可能介导共生体对取食影响的植物特征。在田间实验中,我们对 AMF(两个水平:对照和菌根化)和蚂蚁(两个水平:排除和存在)的存在进行了析因操纵,并量化了作为直接防御的叶片酚类化合物的浓度,以及可能介导直接(例如,食草动物驱避剂)或间接(例如,蚂蚁引诱剂)防御的植物挥发性有机化合物(VOC)排放。此外,我们测量了蚂蚁的丰度,并进行了一项双选择温室实验,以测试 VOC 混合物(模拟对照与 AMF 接种植物释放的混合物)对蚂蚁吸引力的影响,以此作为间接防御的一种机制。蚂蚁的存在显著降低了取食,而菌根化对取食没有可检测的影响,并且共生体的影响是独立运作的。植物特征测量表明,菌根化对叶片酚类化合物没有影响,但显著增加了 VOC 排放。然而,菌根化没有影响蚂蚁的丰度,也没有证据表明 AMF 通过蚂蚁介导的防御对取食有影响。一致性的是,双选择实验表明,AMF 诱导的挥发性混合物对蚂蚁吸引力没有影响。总的来说,这些结果表明,马铃薯植株上的取食主要受到自上而下(蚂蚁介导)而不是自下而上(AMF 介导)的控制,这种效应的不对称性可能阻止了共生体对取食的非加性影响。需要对这方面以及其他植物系统进行进一步的研究,以检验在何种生态背景下更有可能或不太可能出现共生体的相互作用,以及它们对植物适应性和相关群落的影响。