Brown Scott R, Hume Patria A, Brughelli Matt
Department of Kinesiology, Aquinas College, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2024 Jul 29;13:27536351241267108. doi: 10.1177/27536351241267108. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
While several clinical factors have independently been linked to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk factors, their collective impact on knee loading during the sidestep maneuver is unknown. To better understand these factors, we assessed the relationship between strength, balance, and sprint kinetics and external knee abduction moments during sidestepping on each leg.
Sixteen male academy-level rugby union athletes (age, 20 ± 3 years; body-height, 186 ± 9 cm; body-mass, 99 ± 14 kg) were bilaterally assessed in single-leg: isokinetic concentric and eccentric knee and concentric hip strength, balance at 2 difficulty levels, vertical and horizontal force production during maximal sprinting, and 3-dimensional motion capture while sidestepping on the preferred and non-preferred leg. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis based on this theoretical approach of the mechanics of ACL injury risk was performed.
When sidestepping on the preferred leg, larger abduction moments were explained by less concentric hip extension strength and vertical force production during maximal sprinting ( = 41%; ES = 0.64); when sidestepping on the non-preferred leg, larger abduction moments were explained by more concentric hip flexion strength ( = 8%; ES = 0.29). Larger symmetry scores between the legs (representing greater abduction moments) were explained by more horizontal force production during maximal sprinting and less eccentric knee flexion strength ( = 32%; ES = 0.56).
Independently, the preferred and non-preferred legs contribute to increased knee abduction moments via unique distributions of strength and/or sprint kinetics. The allocations of strength and sprint kinetics appear interrelated through weaker posterior muscular strength and may be modifiable through a targeted strength training approach.
虽然一些临床因素已被独立地与前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤风险因素相关联,但它们对侧步动作期间膝关节负荷的综合影响尚不清楚。为了更好地理解这些因素,我们评估了力量、平衡和冲刺动力学与每条腿侧步时膝关节外展力矩之间的关系。
对16名男性学院级橄榄球联盟运动员(年龄,20±3岁;身高,186±9厘米;体重,99±14千克)进行双侧单腿评估:等速向心和离心膝关节以及向心髋关节力量、2个难度级别的平衡、最大冲刺时的垂直和水平力产生,以及在优势腿和非优势腿侧步时的三维运动捕捉。基于这种ACL损伤风险力学的理论方法进行了分层多元回归分析。
在优势腿侧步时,更大的外展力矩可由最大冲刺时较小的向心髋关节伸展力量和垂直力产生来解释(R² = 41%;效应量ES = 0.64);在非优势腿侧步时,更大的外展力矩可由更大的向心髋关节屈曲力量来解释(R² = 8%;效应量ES = 0.29)。两腿之间更大的对称性得分(代表更大的外展力矩)可由最大冲刺时更大的水平力产生和较小的离心膝关节屈曲力量来解释(R² = 32%;效应量ES = 0.56)。
独立地,优势腿和非优势腿通过力量和/或冲刺动力学的独特分布导致膝关节外展力矩增加。力量和冲刺动力学的分配似乎通过较弱的后肌肉力量相互关联,并且可以通过有针对性的力量训练方法进行调节。