Golfenshtein Nadya, Barakat Lamia, Lisanti Amy J, Ash Shifra
Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Psychosocial Services and Behavioral Oncology Research Programs, Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1376-1387. doi: 10.1111/jan.16341. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
To identify profiles of coping in parents of children with cancer and their underlying factors and to examine which profile(s) are associated with illness adaptation.
A cross-sectional study utilizing surveys among parents of children with cancer (n = 89).
Questionnaires included socio-demographics, ways of coping, parenting stress, depression, post-traumatic symptoms, illness adjustment and quality of life. Parental coping profiles were identified via latent profile analysis. Logistic multinomial regression was used to identify predictors of coping profiles. Adaptation outcomes were compared across the coping profiles via multivariable analyses of variance with Bonferroni adjustments.
Five profiles were identified: The 'Strong Repertoire' used coping strategies moderate to high degree, with a positive-active orientation; The 'Moderate-Activist' used a similar pattern, rather more moderately; The 'Self-Regulator' used self-content strategies; The 'Mild-Engager' used active-engaging strategies; The 'Avoidant Coper' used avoidant-passive strategies. Parental stress predicted coping profiles, so that parents experiencing greater stress utilized the 'Avoidant Coper' to a greater degree. Group comparisons revealed that 'Avoidant-Copers' had more depressive and post-traumatic symptoms, worse illness adjustment and lower quality of life.
Passive-avoidant mechanisms of coping may be maladaptive in terms of parental cancer adaptation and indicative of lower resilience.
Findings can direct clinicians to promote familial resilience by adapting policy and practice to meet familial needs.
Not applicable.
识别癌症患儿父母的应对方式及其潜在因素,并研究哪种应对方式与疾病适应相关。
一项横断面研究,对癌症患儿父母(n = 89)进行调查。
问卷包括社会人口统计学、应对方式、育儿压力、抑郁、创伤后症状、疾病适应和生活质量。通过潜在类别分析确定父母的应对方式。使用逻辑多项回归来识别应对方式的预测因素。通过方差多变量分析和Bonferroni校正,比较不同应对方式的适应结果。
识别出五种应对方式:“强大策略型”中度至高度使用应对策略,具有积极主动的取向;“中度积极型”使用类似模式,但程度稍低;“自我调节型”使用自我满足策略;“轻度参与型”使用积极参与策略;“回避型应对者”使用回避被动策略。父母压力预测应对方式,因此压力较大的父母更多地使用“回避型应对者”方式。组间比较显示,“回避型应对者”有更多的抑郁和创伤后症状,疾病适应更差,生活质量更低。
就父母对癌症的适应而言,被动回避应对机制可能是适应不良的,表明恢复力较低。
研究结果可指导临床医生通过调整政策和实践以满足家庭需求来促进家庭恢复力。
不适用。