Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0305709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305709. eCollection 2024.
Few studies investigate whether psychosocial factors (social isolation, social support, trait anger, and depressive symptoms) are associated with cardiovascular health, and none with the American Heart Association's new definition of cardiovascular health, Life's Essential 8 (LE8). Therefore, we assessed the cross-sectional associations of psychosocial factors with Life's Essential 8 and individual components of Life's Essential 8.
We included 11,311 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort participants (58% females; 23% Black; mean age 57 (standard deviation: 6) years) who attended Visit 2 (1990-1992) in this secondary data analysis using cross-sectional data from the ARIC cohort study. Life's Essential 8 components included diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, sleep quality, body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure. Life's Essential 8 was scored per the American Heart Association definition (0-100 range); higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health. Associations of categories (high, moderate, and low) of each psychosocial factor with continuous Life's Essential 8 score and individual Life's Essential 8 components were assessed using multivariable linear regressions.
11% of participants had high Life's Essential 8 scores (80-100), while 67% and 22% had moderate (50-79) and low Life's Essential 8 scores (0-49) respectively. Poor scores on psychosocial factor assessments were associated with lower Life's Essential 8 scores, with the largest magnitude of association for categories of depressive symptoms (low β = Ref.; moderate β = -3.1, (95% confidence interval: -3.7, -2.5; high β = -8.2 (95% confidence interval: -8.8, -7.5)). Most psychosocial factors were associated with Life's Essential 8 scores for diet, physical activity, nicotine, and sleep, but psychosocial factors were not associated with body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, or blood pressure.
Less favorable measures of psychosocial health were associated with lower Life's Essential 8 scores compared better measures of psychosocial health among middle-aged males and females.
很少有研究调查心理社会因素(社会孤立、社会支持、特质愤怒和抑郁症状)是否与心血管健康相关,也没有研究涉及美国心脏协会新的心血管健康定义“生命必备要素 8(Life's essential 8,LE8)”。因此,我们评估了心理社会因素与 Life's essential 8 以及 Life's essential 8 各个组成部分之间的横断面关联。
我们纳入了 11311 名动脉粥样硬化风险社区队列参与者(58%为女性;23%为黑人;平均年龄 57(标准差:6)岁),这些参与者参加了 ARIC 队列研究的第二次访问(1990-1992 年)。Life's essential 8 包括饮食、身体活动、尼古丁暴露、睡眠质量、体重指数、血脂、血糖和血压。Life's essential 8 根据美国心脏协会的定义进行评分(0-100 范围);得分越高表示心血管健康状况越好。使用多变量线性回归评估每个心理社会因素的类别(高、中、低)与连续 Life's essential 8 评分和单个 Life's essential 8 组成部分之间的关系。
11%的参与者获得了较高的 Life's essential 8 评分(80-100),而 67%和 22%的参与者获得了中等(50-79)和较低(0-49)的 Life's essential 8 评分。心理社会因素评估得分较差与 Life's essential 8 评分较低相关,与抑郁症状的类别关联最大(低 β=参考;中 β=-3.1,95%置信区间:-3.7,-2.5;高 β=-8.2,95%置信区间:-8.8,-7.5)。大多数心理社会因素与饮食、身体活动、尼古丁和睡眠的 Life's essential 8 评分相关,但心理社会因素与体重指数、血脂、血糖或血压无关。
与更好的心理社会健康措施相比,更差的心理社会健康措施与中年男性和女性的 Life's essential 8 评分较低相关。