Future Generations University, Franklin, WV, USA.
School of Public Health and Administration, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Aug 27;12(4). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00402.
Increasing prioritization of quality primary health care (PHC) includes community engagement as a key element to improve PHC performance. We assessed the correlation of good regional management practices with PHC performance in Peru in community-comanaged PHC that is designed with multiple accountability mechanisms.
We conducted a secondary analysis of a survey of Dirección Regional de Salud (regional health directorates, DIRESAs) regarding their management of public PHC services with collaborative community involvement by a Comunidad Local de Administración de Salud (Local Community for Health Administration, CLAS). CLAS-run facilities have previously shown evidence of superior performance over standard PHC services. We classified survey questions on 5 management functions of the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative: leadership, information system, financial control, transfer of management and leadership skills to health facilities, and supervision. An expert panel designated management practices as "good" or "less effective." The outcome, PHC service performance, was the percentage of CLAS comanaged facilities in each DIRESA achieving coverage and utilization goals. We correlated frequency of good management practices with PHC service performance. DIRESAs were divided into Group 1, "higher performance," and Group 2, "lower performance," to identify specific practices linked to better performance.
We identified 32 good management practices among 52 response options to 17 questions. Correlation between good management practice and good service performance was significant (r=.7266; 12 df; <.01). An average of 91.1% and 37.6% of CLAS facilities achieved service goals in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Of all good management practices identified, an average of 40.6% and 24.0% were used by Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Group 1 used 11 specific good practices more frequently than Group 2.
Regional management and community-comanaged PHC services designed with accountability mechanisms should be intentionally aligned, incorporating these into policies, budgets, processes, and capacities to strengthen PHC services.
越来越重视初级卫生保健(PHC)的质量,将社区参与作为提高 PHC 绩效的关键要素。我们评估了在秘鲁社区管理的 PHC 中,具有多种问责机制的良好区域管理实践与 PHC 绩效之间的相关性。
我们对 Dirección Regional de Salud(区域卫生部门,DIRESAs)进行了一项调查的二次分析,该调查涉及他们对公共 PHC 服务的管理,社区对卫生管理的参与(Comunidad Local de Administración de Salud,CLAS)。CLAS 管理的设施此前已证明在标准 PHC 服务之上的优越表现。我们将初级卫生保健绩效倡议的 5 项管理职能的调查问题分类:领导力、信息系统、财务控制、管理和领导技能向卫生设施的转移,以及监督。一个专家小组将管理实践指定为“良好”或“效果较差”。结果,PHC 服务绩效是每个 DIRESA 中实现覆盖范围和利用率目标的 CLAS 共同管理设施的百分比。我们将良好管理实践的频率与 PHC 服务绩效相关联。将 DIRESAs 分为“绩效较高”的第 1 组和“绩效较低”的第 2 组,以确定与更好的绩效相关的具体实践。
我们在对 17 个问题的 52 个回复选项中确定了 32 种良好的管理实践。良好管理实践与良好服务绩效之间的相关性显著(r=.7266;12 df;<.01)。在第 1 组和第 2 组中,平均有 91.1%和 37.6%的 CLAS 设施达到了服务目标。在确定的所有良好管理实践中,第 1 组和第 2 组分别平均使用了 40.6%和 24.0%。第 1 组比第 2 组更频繁地使用 11 种特定的良好实践。
应将具有问责机制的区域管理和社区共同管理的 PHC 服务有意地结合起来,将这些服务纳入政策、预算、流程和能力中,以加强 PHC 服务。