Suppr超能文献

诊断皮肤病理学中三种塑料包埋方法的比较研究

Comparative study of three methods of plastic embedding in diagnostic dermatopathology.

作者信息

Mason M, Mackie R M

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 1985 Dec;38(12):1397-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.12.1397.

Abstract

Three methods of plastic embedding were assessed for their value in routine dermatopathology. The J B 4, Taab embedding, and Taab transmit techniques were compared for quality, convenience, and safety. The Taab transmit method was the most satisfactory method, being both rapid and simple. An additional advantage is that the resin can be removed and the immunoperoxidase technique carried out on thin sections.

摘要

评估了三种塑料包埋方法在常规皮肤病理学中的价值。比较了JB 4、Taab包埋法和Taab透射法在质量、便利性和安全性方面的差异。Taab透射法是最令人满意的方法,既快速又简单。另一个优点是可以去除树脂,并在薄切片上进行免疫过氧化物酶技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52b9/499499/37593abcdc22/jclinpath00195-0078-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验