• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 1-Year Follow-Up.俯卧经腰大肌腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效:1年随访
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 12;18(4):400-407. doi: 10.14444/8625.
2
Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique.俯卧经腰大肌腰椎椎间融合技术的早期临床疗效
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):112-121. doi: 10.14444/8390. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Single Position Lateral versus Prone Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion Inclusive of L4-L5: A Single Surgeon Experience Examining Early Postoperative Outcomes.单节段侧卧位与俯卧位经多裂肌间隙腰椎体间融合术(含 L4-L5):单一术者经验探讨早期术后结果。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;187:e460-e464. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.109. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Prone Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion (PTP LIF) with Anterior Docking: Preliminary functional and radiographic outcomes.前路对接的俯卧经腰大肌外侧椎间融合术(PTP LIF):初步功能和影像学结果。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Sep 28;16:100283. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100283. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Robotic-Assisted Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.机器人辅助单体位俯卧位腰椎侧方椎间融合术:适应证、技术及疗效
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Nov 15;13(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00022. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
6
Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.微创前路和外侧经椎间孔入路闭合复位治疗 II 度脊椎滑脱:初步临床和放射学经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17574.
7
Comparison of Prone Transpsoas and Standard Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Retrospective Radiographic Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.经皮穿刺前路腰椎间融合术与标准侧路腰椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的比较:回顾性放射影像学倾向评分匹配分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:e11-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.097. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
8
Laterally Placed Expandable Interbody Spacers With and Without Adjustable Lordosis Improve Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study.具有和不具有可调节前凸的侧向放置可扩展椎间融合器可改善影像学和临床结果:一项两年随访研究
Cureus. 2021 Dec 9;13(12):e20302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20302. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion.单纯侧方腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎融合术后症状性邻近节段退变。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):2025-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
10
Clinical and radiographic outcomes following 120 consecutive patients undergoing prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion.120 例连续行俯卧位经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术患者的临床和影像学结果。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3492-3502. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08379-3. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Exoscopic Technology: A Review of Key Innovations.利用椎间孔镜技术优化单节段俯卧位腰椎椎间融合术:关键创新回顾
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 10;14(4):1132. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041132.

本文引用的文献

1
Prone Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion (PTP LIF) with Anterior Docking: Preliminary functional and radiographic outcomes.前路对接的俯卧经腰大肌外侧椎间融合术(PTP LIF):初步功能和影像学结果。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Sep 28;16:100283. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100283. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Complications associated with single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and pooled analysis.单一体位俯卧位侧方腰椎体间融合术相关并发症:系统评价和汇总分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jun 2;39(3):380-386. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.SPINE221180. Print 2023 Sep 1.
3
Long-Term Durability of Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单纯侧方腰椎间融合的长期耐用性
Neurosurgery. 2023 Jul 1;93(1):60-65. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002371. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
4
Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique.俯卧经腰大肌腰椎椎间融合技术的早期临床疗效
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):112-121. doi: 10.14444/8390. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
5
The impact of cage positioning on lumbar lordosis and disc space restoration following minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion.椎间融合器位置对微创外侧腰椎椎间融合术后腰椎前凸及椎间隙恢复的影响
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E7. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22607.
6
Single-position prone lateral transpsoas approach: early experience and outcomes.单体位俯卧经腰大肌入路:早期经验与结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Oct 22;36(3):358-365. doi: 10.3171/2021.6.SPINE21420. Print 2022 Mar 1.
7
Single-Position Prone Lateral Interbody Fusion Improves Segmental Lordosis in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.单体位俯卧位侧方椎间融合术可改善腰椎滑脱症的节段性前凸。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jul;151:e786-e792. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.128. Epub 2021 May 6.
8
Changes in Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Different Lordotic Cage Angulations.不同前凸椎间融合器角度下腰椎侧方椎间融合术后节段性及腰椎前凸的变化
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):440-448. doi: 10.14444/8066. Epub 2021 May 7.
9
Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion.与传统的环形融合相比,单体位环形融合可提高手术效率,减少并发症和住院时间。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):810-820. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
10
Prone Transpsoas Technique for Simultaneous Single-Position Access to the Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Spine.俯卧经腰大肌技术用于在单一位置同时进入腰椎前后方
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Dec 15;20(1):E5-E12. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa328.

俯卧经腰大肌腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效:1年随访

Clinical Outcomes of Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 1-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Singh Hardeep, Wellington Ian, Zeng Francine, Antonacci Christopher, Mancini Michael, Mohamed Mirghani, Broska Joellen, Mallozzi Scott, Moss Isaac

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Comprehensive Spine Center, Farmington, CT, USA

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Comprehensive Spine Center, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 12;18(4):400-407. doi: 10.14444/8625.

DOI:10.14444/8625
PMID:39084942
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11483461/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is commonly used to address various lumbar pathologies. LLIF using the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach has several potential advantages, allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns of the spine. The aim of this study was to report the 1-year outcomes of LLIF via PTP.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 97 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF via PTP. Radiographic parameters, including lumbar-lordosis, segmental-lordosis, anterior disc height, and posterior disc height, were measured on preoperative, initial-postoperative, and 1-year postoperative imaging. Patient-reported outcomes measures, including Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS), pain EQ5D, and postoperative complications, were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven consecutive patients underwent 161 levels of LLIF. Fifty-seven percent underwent 1-level LLIF, 30% 2-level LLIF, 6% 3-level LLIF, and 7% 4-level LLIF. The most common level was L4 to L5 (35%), followed by L3 to L4 (33%), L2 to L3 (21%), and L1 to L2 (11%). Significant improvements were noted at initial and 1-year postoperative periods in lumbar-lordosis (2° ± 10°, = 0.049; 3° ± 9°, = 0.005), segmental-lordosis (6° ± 5°, < 0.001; 5° ± 5°, < 0.001), anterior disc height (8 mm ± 4 mm, < 0.001; 7 mm ± 4 mm, < 0.001), and posterior disc height (3 mm ± 2 mm, < 0.001; 3 mm ± 2 mm, < 0.001). Significant improvements were seen in Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks ( = 0.002), 6 months ( < 0.001), and 1 year ( < 0.001) postoperatively; pain EQ5D at 6 weeks ( < 0.001), 6 months ( < 0.001), and 1 year ( < 0.001) postoperatively; and leg and back visual analog scale at 2 weeks ( < 0.001), 6 months ( < 0.001), and 1 year ( < 0.001) postoperatively. The average length of stay was 2.5 days, and the most common complications were ipsilateral hip flexor pain (46%), weakness (59%), and contralateral hip flexor pain (29%).

CONCLUSION

PTP is a novel way of performing LLIF. These 1-year data support that PTP is an effective, safe, and viable approach with similar patient-reported outcome measures and complications profiles as LLIF performed in the lateral decubitus position.

摘要

背景

腰椎外侧椎间融合术(LLIF)常用于治疗各种腰椎疾病。采用俯卧经腰大肌(PTP)入路的LLIF具有多种潜在优势,可同时显露脊柱的前柱和后柱。本研究旨在报告经PTP入路LLIF的1年疗效。

方法

对97例连续接受经PTP入路LLIF的患者进行回顾性分析。在术前、术后即刻和术后1年的影像学检查中测量腰椎前凸、节段性前凸、椎间盘前缘高度和椎间盘后缘高度等影像学参数。回顾患者报告的结局指标,包括Oswestry功能障碍指数、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、疼痛EQ5D以及术后并发症。

结果

97例连续患者共接受了161节段的LLIF。57%的患者接受1节段LLIF,30%接受2节段LLIF,6%接受3节段LLIF,7%接受4节段LLIF。最常见的节段是L4至L5(35%),其次是L3至L4(33%)、L2至L3(21%)和L1至L2(11%)。在术后即刻和术后1年时,腰椎前凸(分别为2°±10°,P = 0.049;3°±9°,P = 0.005)、节段性前凸(分别为6°±5°,P < 0.001;5°±5°,P < 0.001)、椎间盘前缘高度(分别为8 mm±4 mm,P < 0.001;7 mm±4 mm,P < 0.001)和椎间盘后缘高度(分别为3 mm±2 mm,P < 0.001;3 mm±2 mm,P < 0.001)均有显著改善。术后6周(P = 0.002)、6个月(P < 0.001)和1年(P < 0.001)时,Oswestry功能障碍指数有显著改善;术后6周(P < 0.001)、6个月(P < 0.001)和1年(P < 0.001)时,疼痛EQ5D有显著改善;术后2周(P < 0.001)、6个月(P < 0.001)和1年(P < 0.001)时,腿部和背部视觉模拟量表有显著改善。平均住院时间为2.5天,最常见的并发症是同侧髋屈肌疼痛(46%)、无力(59%)和对侧髋屈肌疼痛(29%)。

结论

PTP是一种开展LLIF的新方法。这些1年的数据支持PTP是一种有效、安全且可行的方法,其患者报告的结局指标和并发症情况与侧卧位LLIF相似。