• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善治疗困难的高血压患者的不依从性和降低血压值:ATHAN 临床试验。

Improvement of non-adherence and reduction of BP values in patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension: the ATHAN clinical trial.

机构信息

Hypertension Unit, Nephrology Dpt, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2864-2873. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01748-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1038/s41440-024-01748-x
PMID:39085464
Abstract

Hypertension treatment and blood pressure (BP) control reduce cardiovascular disease burden. However, prevalence of controlled BP is overall insufficient and lack of adherence to treatment is a suggested major contributor. This prospective, randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate whether a specific 3-month (m) action plan to improve therapeutic adherence results in a decrease in BP. Patients with ambulatory 24 h-BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg despite receiving ≥2 antihypertensive drugs and with therapeutic non-compliance confirmed by antihypertensive drugs analyzed in urine were randomized (1:1) to receive a specific 3 m program to improve adherence (INT = intervention) or routine follow-up (C = control). Antihypertensive treatment was not modified and knowledge of non-adherence was only notified to patients randomized to the intervention group. Before randomization and at 3 m all patients underwent urinary screening for antihypertensive drugs and 24 h-ambulatory-BP monitoring. Forty-five patients (36% women, mean age: 58 ± 13 yr) were randomized. At 3 m, mean (95% CI) BP differences (INT vs. C) were 12.2 mmHg (4.3-20.8), adjusted-p = 0.032 and 8.7 mmHg (2.5-14.8), adjusted-p = 0.018 for 24 h-systolic and 24 h-diastolic BP, respectively. Differences (INT vs. C) for office SBP and DBP were 18.4 mmHg (6.8-30.1), adjusted-p = 0.005 and 15.7 mmHg (7.2-24.2), adjusted-p < 0.001. Non-detected antihypertensive drugs were median [IQR]: 40% [25-100] and 0% [0-20] at baseline and 3 m, respectively, in the INT group, and 33.3% [25-63.7] and 33.3% [23.8-57.9], in the C group (p < 0.001 for the 3-month between-group comparison). A combined action plan of notifying knowledge of non-adherence plus a 3-month specific nursing intervention to improve therapeutic adherence results in BP reduction in patients with inadequate therapeutic compliance.

摘要

高血压治疗和血压(BP)控制可降低心血管疾病负担。然而,总体上,血压得到控制的患者比例不足,治疗依从性差是一个重要的原因。本前瞻性、随机临床试验旨在评估特定的 3 个月(m)行动计划是否能改善治疗依从性,从而降低血压。选择接受≥2 种降压药物治疗但 24 小时动态血压(ABP)≥130/80mmHg 且经尿液分析证实降压药物治疗依从性差的患者进行随机分组(1:1),分别接受特定的 3 个月改善依从性计划(INT=干预组)或常规随访(C=对照组)。不改变降压治疗方案,仅告知随机分组至干预组的患者存在药物治疗不依从。在随机分组前和 3 个月时,所有患者均进行尿液降压药物筛查和 24 小时动态 ABP 监测。共 45 例患者(36%为女性,平均年龄 58±13 岁)接受随机分组。3 个月时,INT 组和 C 组的平均(95%CI)BP 差值分别为 12.2mmHg(4.3-20.8),p=0.032 和 8.7mmHg(2.5-14.8),p=0.018,分别为 24 小时收缩压和舒张压差值;INT 组和 C 组诊室 SBP 和 DBP 的差值分别为 18.4mmHg(6.8-30.1),p=0.005 和 15.7mmHg(7.2-24.2),p<0.001。INT 组患者基线和 3 个月时未检测到的降压药物中位数[IQR]分别为 40%[25-100]和 0%[0-20],C 组分别为 33.3%[25-63.7]和 33.3%[23.8-57.9](组间 3 个月比较,p<0.001)。不依从性知识告知加 3 个月特定护理干预的综合行动计划可改善治疗依从性,从而降低血压控制不充分患者的血压。

相似文献

1
Improvement of non-adherence and reduction of BP values in patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension: the ATHAN clinical trial.改善治疗困难的高血压患者的不依从性和降低血压值:ATHAN 临床试验。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2864-2873. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01748-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Long-Term Effect of Home Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring Plus Medication Self-Titration for Patients With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the ADAMPA Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭血压自我监测加药物自我滴定对高血压患者的长期影响:ADAMPA 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2410063. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10063.
3
Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring With Social Support for Patients With Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.远程血压监测联合社会支持用于高血压患者:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2413515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13515.
4
Self-monitoring of blood pressure for improving adherence to antihypertensive medicines and blood pressure control: a randomized controlled trial.自我血压监测以提高抗高血压药物依从性和血压控制:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Hypertens. 2014 Nov;27(11):1339-45. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu062. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
5
The effect of renal denervation in moderate treatment-resistant hypertension with confirmed medication adherence.肾去神经支配术对中度难治性高血压且已证实坚持服药患者的疗效。
J Hypertens. 2016 Dec;34(12):2475-2479. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001110.
6
A multifaceted pharmacist intervention to improve antihypertensive adherence: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial (HAPPy trial).一项改善抗高血压依从性的多方面药师干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验(HAPPy试验)。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014 Oct;39(5):527-34. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12185. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
7
Fixed-Dose Triple Combination of Antihypertensive Drugs Improves Blood Pressure Control: From Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice.固定剂量三联抗高血压药物组合可改善血压控制:从临床试验到临床实践。
Adv Ther. 2017 Apr;34(4):975-985. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0511-1. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
Who benefits more from hemodynamically guided hypotensive therapy? The experience from two randomized, prospective and controlled trials.谁能从血流动力学引导的降压治疗中获益更多?两项随机、前瞻性对照试验的经验。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Feb;10(1):21-9. doi: 10.1177/1753944715618593. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
9
Pharmacist intervention program to enhance hypertension control: a randomised controlled trial.药师干预方案对高血压控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Feb;33(1):132-40. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9474-x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
10
Blood pressure reductions following catheter-based renal denervation are not related to improvements in adherence to antihypertensive drugs measured by urine/plasma toxicological analysis.经导管肾去神经支配术后的血压降低与通过尿液/血浆毒理学分析测得的抗高血压药物依从性改善无关。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Dec;104(12):1097-105. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0905-5. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Antihypertensive drug concentration measurement combined with personalized feedback in resistant hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.抗高血压药物浓度测量联合个体化反馈在耐药性高血压中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
J Hypertens. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):169-178. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003585. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Relationship between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure and mortality: an observational cohort study in 59 124 patients.临床和动态血压与死亡率的关系:59124 例患者的观察性队列研究。
Lancet. 2023 Jun 17;401(10393):2041-2050. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00733-X. Epub 2023 May 5.
3
Global Burden, Regional Differences, Trends, and Health Consequences of Medication Nonadherence for Hypertension During 2010 to 2020: A Meta-Analysis Involving 27 Million Patients.
2010 年至 2020 年期间全球范围内高血压药物治疗不依从的负担、地区差异、趋势及其对健康的影响:一项涉及 2700 万患者的荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 6;11(17):e026582. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026582. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
4
Hypertension: The most common chronic health problem in Spain. A call to action.高血压:西班牙最常见的慢性健康问题。呼吁采取行动。
Hipertens Riesgo Vasc. 2022 Jul-Sep;39(3):121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.hipert.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 May 20.
5
Effect of electronic adherence monitoring on adherence and outcomes in chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.电子依从性监测对慢性病患者依从性和结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265715. eCollection 2022.
6
Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.药物依从性与血压控制:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Hypertension. 2022 Jan;79(1):e1-e14. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000203. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Assessment of a strategy combining ambulatory blood pressure, adherence monitoring and a standardised triple therapy in resistant hypertension.评估一种联合动态血压监测、药物依从性监测和标准化三联疗法治疗耐药性高血压的策略。
Blood Press. 2021 Dec;30(6):332-340. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2021.1907174. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
8
Strategies to Improve Adherence to Anti-Hypertensive Medications: a Narrative Review.提高抗高血压药物依从性的策略:叙述性综述。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020 Nov 9;22(12):105. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-01115-4.
9
Trends in Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018.美国成年人高血压患者血压控制趋势,1999-2000 年至 2017-2018 年。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1190-1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545.
10
High Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease.高血压与心血管疾病。
Hypertension. 2020 Feb;75(2):285-292. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14240. Epub 2019 Dec 23.