Morrison Susan, Batting Joanne, Wanga Valentine, Beesham Ivana, Deese Jennifer, Hofmeyr G Justus, Kasaro Margaret P, Louw Cheryl, Morrison Charles, Mugo Nelly R, Palanee-Phillips Thesla, Pleaner Melanie, Reddy Krishnaveni, Scoville Caitlin W, Smit Jenni, Stringer Jeffrey S A, Ahmed Khatija, Bukusi Elizabeth, Kotze Philip, Baeten Jared M
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand and Eastern Cape Department of Health, East London, South Africa.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2024 Dec 1;97(4):364-370. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003497.
Accurate HIV point of care testing is the cornerstone of prevention and treatment efforts globally, although false (both negative and positive) results are expected to occur.
We assessed the spectrum of true and false positive HIV results in a large prospective study of HIV incidence in African women using 3 contraceptive methods tested longitudinally in Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia.
HIV serologic testing was conducted quarterly using 2 parallel rapid HIV tests. When one or both tests were positive, additional confirmatory testing was conducted, including HIV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and RNA.
A total of 7730 women contributed 48,234 visits: true positive results occurred at 412 visits (0.9%) and false positives at 96 visits (0.2%). Of 412 women with HIV seroconversion, 10 had discordant (ie, 1 negative and 1 positive) rapid tests and 13 had undetectable HIV RNA levels. Of 62 women with false positive rapid HIV results, most had discordant rapid testing, but 6 (9.7%) had dually positive rapid results, and 4 (6.5%) had false positive or indeterminate EIA results. The positive predictive value of dual positive rapid results was 98.3%.
Although most rapid test results were accurate, false positive results were expected and occurred in this population of initially HIV seronegative individuals tested repeatedly and prospectively. When HIV infection occurred, not all cases had textbook laboratory results. Our findings highlight the importance of confirmatory testing, particularly for individuals undergoing repeat testing and in settings where the point prevalence is expected to be low.
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02550067.
准确的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)即时检测是全球预防和治疗工作的基石,不过预计会出现假(阴性和阳性)结果。
我们在一项对非洲女性HIV发病率的大型前瞻性研究中,评估了使用在斯威士兰、肯尼亚、南非和赞比亚纵向检测的3种避孕方法时HIV真阳性和假阳性结果的范围。
每季度使用2种平行的HIV快速检测进行HIV血清学检测。当一项或两项检测呈阳性时,进行额外的确认检测,包括HIV酶免疫测定(EIA)和RNA检测。
共有7730名女性进行了48234次就诊:412次就诊出现真阳性结果(0.9%),96次就诊出现假阳性结果(0.2%)。在412名发生HIV血清转化的女性中,10名快速检测结果不一致(即1项阴性和1项阳性),13名HIV RNA水平检测不到。在62名HIV快速检测结果为假阳性的女性中,大多数快速检测结果不一致,但6名(9.7%)快速检测结果均为阳性,4名(6.5%)EIA结果为假阳性或不确定。两项快速检测结果均为阳性的阳性预测值为98.3%。
尽管大多数快速检测结果准确,但在这一反复进行前瞻性检测的初始HIV血清阴性个体人群中,假阳性结果是预期会出现且确实出现了。当发生HIV感染时,并非所有病例都有典型的实验室结果。我们的研究结果凸显了确认检测的重要性,特别是对于接受重复检测的个体以及预期现患率较低的环境。
ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT02550067。