• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性与非感染性腹主动脉瘤的临床和计算机断层血管摄影特征:一项比较研究。

Clinical and computed tomography angiography characteristics of infected vs. non-infected abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, No. 99, Longcheng Street, Taiyuan, 030036, Shanxi, China.

Department of Emergency, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, 030036, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Dec;49(12):4334-4340. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04312-w. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04312-w
PMID:39088018
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and multi-slice spiral computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) characteristics for the diagnosis of infected AAA.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study included patients who were diagnosed with AAA at our hospital between January 2014 and May 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included, comprising 20 with infected AAA and 20 with non-infected AAA. Patients with infected AAA were more likely to be younger (62.9 ± 10.1 vs. 70.0 ± 4.4 years, P = 0.007) and to present with fever [7 (35%) vs. 1 (5%), P = 0.026], pain [15 (75%) vs. 2 (10%), P < 0.001], higher C-reactive protein levels (60.4 ± 57.0 vs. 4.1 ± 2.9 mg/l, P = 0.005), and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rates (47.7 ± 23.4 vs. 15.2 ± 8.3 mm/h, P < 0.001) compared to those with non-infected AAA. Moreover, those with infected AAA exhibited significantly more eccentric saccular morphology [17 (85%) vs. 1 (5%), P = 0.002], a smaller longitudinal-transverse ratio (1.12 ± 0.33 vs. 2.33 ± 0.54, P = 0.001), thicker peri-aneurysmal soft tissue (2.29 ± 1.48 vs. 0.73 ± 0.55 cm, P < 0.001), more lobulated margins [18 (90%) vs. 1 (5%), P = 0.001], lower aortic calcification scores (49 vs. 56, P < 0.001), more pneumatosis [6 (30%) vs. 0 (0%), P = 0.014], more ruptures [15 (75%) vs. 5 (20%), P = 0.002], more blurred peri-abdominal aortic fat spaces [16 (80%) vs. 2 (10%), P = 0.001], more adjacent bone destruction [5 (25%) vs. 0 (0%), P = 0.025], more involvement of the psoas major muscle [8 (40%) vs. 1 (5%), P = 0.005], more lymphadenectasis [8 (40%) vs. 1 (5%), P = 0.020], and less tortuous aortas [2 (10%) vs. 9 (45%), P = 0.034] compared with those with non-infected AAA.

CONCLUSION

The clinical manifestations and MSCTA characteristics may differ between infected and non-infected AAA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨感染性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的临床和多层螺旋 CT 血管造影(MSCTA)特征。

方法

本回顾性对比研究纳入了 2014 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在我院诊断为 AAA 的患者。

结果

共纳入 40 例患者,其中 20 例为感染性 AAA,20 例为非感染性 AAA。感染性 AAA 患者更年轻(62.9±10.1 岁 vs. 70.0±4.4 岁,P=0.007),更易出现发热[7(35%) vs. 1(5%),P=0.026]、疼痛[15(75%) vs. 2(10%),P<0.001]、更高的 C 反应蛋白水平(60.4±57.0 比 4.1±2.9mg/l,P=0.005)和红细胞沉降率(47.7±23.4 比 15.2±8.3mm/h,P<0.001),而非感染性 AAA 患者。此外,感染性 AAA 患者的囊状形态更偏心[17(85%) vs. 1(5%),P=0.002],纵向-横向比更小(1.12±0.33 比 2.33±0.54,P=0.001),更厚的瘤周软组织[2.29±1.48 比 0.73±0.55cm,P<0.001],更分叶状边缘[18(90%) vs. 1(5%),P=0.001],更低的主动脉钙化评分(49 比 56,P<0.001),更多的积气[6(30%) vs. 0(0%),P=0.014],更多的破裂[15(75%) vs. 5(20%),P=0.002],更模糊的腹腔主动脉脂肪间隙[16(80%) vs. 2(10%),P=0.001],更多的邻近骨破坏[5(25%) vs. 0(0%),P=0.025],更大的腰大肌受累[8(40%) vs. 1(5%),P=0.005],更多的淋巴结肿大[8(40%) vs. 1(5%),P=0.020],更少的主动脉迂曲[2(10%) vs. 9(45%),P=0.034]。

结论

感染性和非感染性 AAA 的临床表现和 MSCTA 特征可能不同。

相似文献

1
Clinical and computed tomography angiography characteristics of infected vs. non-infected abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparative study.感染性与非感染性腹主动脉瘤的临床和计算机断层血管摄影特征:一项比较研究。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Dec;49(12):4334-4340. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04312-w. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
F-Sodium Fluoride Uptake in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The SoFIA Study.腹部主动脉瘤中 F-氟化钠摄取:SoFIA 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 6;71(5):513-523. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.053.
3
Computed Tomography Angiography Markers and Intraluminal Thrombus Morphology as Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture.计算机断层血管造影标志物和管腔内血栓形态学与腹主动脉瘤破裂的预测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):15961. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315961.
4
CT analysis of aortic calcifications to predict abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.CT 分析主动脉钙化程度预测腹主动脉瘤破裂。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):3903-3911. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10429-1. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
5
Contrast inhomogeneity in CT angiography of the abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤CT血管造影中的对比剂不均匀性。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Mar-Apr;10(2):179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
6
Low Shear Stress at Baseline Predicts Expansion and Aneurysm-Related Events in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.基线时的低切变应力可预测腹主动脉瘤患者的扩张和与动脉瘤相关的事件。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Dec;14(12):1112-1121. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.013160. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
7
Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a multicenter study.非酒精性脂肪性肝病与腹主动脉瘤进展之间的关联:一项多中心研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01559-7.
8
The prognostic impact of vascular calcification on abdominal aortic aneurysm progression.血管钙化对腹主动脉瘤进展的预后影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1926-1934. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.062. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Anatomical Differences Between Intact and Ruptured Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.完整与破裂大型腹主动脉瘤的解剖学差异。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Feb;27(1):117-123. doi: 10.1177/1526602819886568. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
10
Inflammation as a Predictor of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth and Rupture: A Systematic Review of Imaging Biomarkers.炎症作为腹主动脉瘤生长和破裂的预测指标:影像学生物标志物的系统评价
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Sep;52(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Ruptured Infected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Caused by Salmonella spp.: A Case Report.沙门氏菌属所致破裂感染性腹主动脉瘤的治疗:一例报告
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Sep;10(3):1799-1805. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00492-w. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Abdominal aortic aneurysm-an independent disease to atherosclerosis?腹主动脉瘤——一种独立于动脉粥样硬化的疾病?
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2017 Mar-Apr;27:71-75. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
3
Serum proteomics in patients with diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
血清蛋白质组学在诊断为腹主动脉瘤的患者中的应用。
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012 Jul-Aug;21(4):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
4
Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease.在 65 岁的瑞典男性中,腹主动脉瘤的患病率较低,表明该疾病的流行病学发生了变化。
Circulation. 2011 Sep 6;124(10):1118-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.030379. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
5
Primary infected abdominal aortic aneurysm: surgical procedures, early mortality rates, and a survey of the prevalence of infectious organisms over a 30-year period.原发性感染性腹主动脉瘤:30 年来的手术治疗、早期死亡率及感染病原体的流行情况调查。
Surg Today. 2011 Mar;41(3):346-51. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4279-z. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
6
Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤的病理生理学和流行病学。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Feb;8(2):92-102. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.180. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
7
Succesful [Successful] endovascular repair of an abdominal mycotic aneurysm. A case report.腹主动脉感染性动脉瘤的成功血管腔内修复:一例报告
Acta Chir Belg. 2009 Nov-Dec;109(6):788-90. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680539.
8
[Infected aortic aneurysms].
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2009 Jan;110(1):12-6.
9
Cardiovascular risk profile and outcome of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in out-patients with atherothrombosis: data from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry.动脉粥样硬化血栓形成门诊患者腹主动脉瘤的心血管风险概况及结局:来自持续健康降低动脉粥样硬化血栓形成(REACH)注册研究的数据
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Oct;48(4):808-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.05.026. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
10
Infected aortic aneurysms.
Acta Chir Belg. 2005 Sep-Oct;105(5):482-6. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2005.11679764.