Mebrahtu Kibrom, Teshale S, Esatu Wendimeneh, Habte Tadios, Gelaye Esayas
Jinka Agricultural Research Center, Department of Animal Health, Southern Ethiopian Nations, Nationalities and People's Regional State, Jinka, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Bishoftu Ethiopia, Department of Clinical Studies, P.O. Box 34, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Feb 13;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1355-x.
Newcastle disease (ND) is a highly infectious disease causing considerable economic losses to poultry farmers worldwide. Conventional vaccine delivery methods are not suitable for smallholder and rural poultry producers, and thus appropriate vaccination methods need to be sought. This study was carried out with the main objective of evaluating the efficacy of ND I2 vaccine delivered via drinking water and spray under smallholder farmers' condition in Minjar-Shenkora district, central Ethiopia. Twenty households were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Chickens owned by the selected households were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups. Blood samples were collected regularly for antibody assay from individual chicken vaccinated with ND I2 vaccine using different routes.
At baseline, there was no difference in antibody titer among the experimental groups. After the first and booster vaccinations, the three vaccinated groups had significantly higher antibody titer (P < 0.001) than the unvaccinated control group. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference in antibody titer among the vaccinated groups. Out of the 40 chicken in the unvaccinated control only 14 had antibody titter≥ log. Similarly 19/37 of chicken in the drinking water group, 19/37 of chicken in the eye drop group and 20/40 chicken in the spray group had antibody titer ≥ log. Two weeks after the first vaccination the proportion of chicken with antibody titer ≥ log rose to 23/37, 30/37 and 29/40 in the group vaccinated via drinking water, eye drop and spray, respectively. The proportion remained low in unvaccinated group. Hundred percent of the vaccinated chicken survived after infection with the virulent ND virus (Alemaya strain); whereas only 40% survived from the unvaccinated control group.
The results of this study showed that ND I2 vaccine administered via drinking water and spray under smallholder farmers' situation provoked protective antibody level similar to the eye drop method. The use of ND I2 vaccine could contribute to food security if used by rural poultry farmers properly.
新城疫(ND)是一种高度传染性疾病,给全球家禽养殖户造成了巨大的经济损失。传统的疫苗接种方法不适用于小农户和农村家禽养殖户,因此需要寻找合适的接种方法。本研究的主要目的是在埃塞俄比亚中部明贾尔 - 申科拉区小农户的条件下,评估通过饮水和喷雾方式接种新城疫I2疫苗的效果。20户家庭被随机分为干预组和对照组。所选家庭饲养的鸡被随机分配到三个干预组之一。定期从采用不同途径接种新城疫I2疫苗的个体鸡采集血样进行抗体检测。
在基线时,各实验组的抗体滴度没有差异。首次和加强免疫接种后,三个接种组的抗体滴度显著高于未接种的对照组(P < 0.001)。有趣的是,接种组之间的抗体滴度没有统计学上的显著差异。在未接种的对照组的40只鸡中,只有14只的抗体滴度≥log。同样,饮水组的37只鸡中有19只、滴眼组的37只鸡中有19只、喷雾组的40只鸡中有20只的抗体滴度≥log。首次接种两周后,饮水接种组、滴眼接种组和喷雾接种组中抗体滴度≥log的鸡的比例分别升至23/37、30/37和29/40。未接种组的比例仍然较低。接种疫苗的鸡在感染强毒新城疫病毒(阿莱马亚毒株)后100%存活;而未接种的对照组中只有40%存活。
本研究结果表明,在小农户的情况下,通过饮水和喷雾方式接种新城疫I2疫苗可激发与滴眼法相似的保护性抗体水平。如果农村家禽养殖户正确使用新城疫I2疫苗,可为粮食安全做出贡献。