Dosimetric implications of kidney anatomical volume changes in Lu-DOTATATE therapy.

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to evaluate the use of CT-based whole kidney parenchyma (WKP) segmentation in Lu-DOTATATE dosimetry. Specifically, it investigates whether WKP volumes change during treatment and evaluates the accuracy of applying a single delineated WKP volume for dosimetry. Furthermore, it aims to determine the cause of WKP volume changes-whether caused by radiation or amino acid infusion-by comparing them with spleen volume changes as a marker for radiation-induced alterations.

METHODS

SPECT/CT images of 18 patients were acquired over the abdomen approximately 4 h (h) (D0), 24 h (D1), 48 h (D2) and 168 h (D7) post-administration of Lu-DOTATATE. CT guided WKP volumes were measured before (baseline) and during treatment. Kidney activity concentrations at each time point were derived from CT-segmented WKP overlaid on SPECT scans. The accuracy of using WKP segmentation from a single CT for all time points was assessed against the gold standard of segmenting each WKP individually. Time-integrated activity calculations were based on a tri-exponential curve fit of the kidney activity concentration over time. Kidney absorbed doses were estimated under the assumption of local energy deposition. Additionally, the impact of various partial volume correction methods on dosimetry was evaluated.

RESULTS

Whole-kidney parenchyma (WKP) volumes, ranging from 31 to 243 mL, showed a gradual increase from baseline (mean ± SD = 130.6 ± 46.1 mL) at the initial time points D0 (138.5 ± 44.7 mL) and D1 (139.4 ± 41.6 mL), followed by a slight decrease at D2 (132.8 ± 44.5 mL) and a further decrease at D7 (129.2 ± 42.7 mL). The volume increase at D0 and D1 was statistically significant. Spleen volume did not change during treatment, suggesting that amino acid infusion rather than irradiation effects caused WKP volume changes. Bland-Altman analysis revealed WKP volume biases of 8.77% (D0 vs. B), 10.77% (D1 vs. B), 1.10% (D2 vs. B), and 1.10% (D7 vs. B), with corresponding uncertainties of 24.4%, 23.6%, 25.4%, and 25.4%, respectively. When WKP segmentation from a single CT is applied across all SPECTs, these WKP volume changes could overestimate the activity concentration and mean absorbed doses up to 4.3% and 2.5%, respectively. The absorbed dose uncertainties using a recovery coefficient (RC) of 0.85 for single-time-point WKP delineation increase the absorbed dose uncertainty by 4% compared to the use of patient-specific RCs and time specific segmentation of WKP volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney volume exhibited significant variation form D0 to D7, affecting the precision of dosimetry calculation, primarily due to errors in whole-kidney parenchyma (WKP) delineation. Notably, using WKP segmentation from a single CT scan applied to sequential SPECT images introduce further uncertainty and may lead to an overestimation of the absorbed dose. The fluctuations in kidney volume are most likely attributable to amino acid infusion.