Suppr超能文献

当对侧未检查侧脚趾离开地面就座时,基于束带稳定的手持式或等速测力计的等长伸膝力量测试的可靠性。

Reliability of belt-stabilized handheld or isokinetic dynamometer-based isometric knee-extensor strength-testing when seated with the toes of the contralateral nonexamined side off the floor.

作者信息

Hirano Masahiro, Katoh Munenori

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, SBC Tokyo Medical University: 5-8-1 Akemi, Urayasu-shi, Chiba 279-8567, Japan.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2024 Aug;36(8):402-406. doi: 10.1589/jpts.36.402. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

Abstract

[Purpose] To determine the intra-rater and inter-devices reliability of isometric knee-extensor muscle-strength-measurement. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 77 university students (50 males; 27 females) who underwent isometric knee-extension muscle-strength measurement twice with a belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer and isokinetic dynamometer. The intra-rater and inter-devices reliability was ascertained from measurements that were performed with the participant seated on the edge of the bed, the toes of the contralateral nonexamined side off the floor, and the trunk supported by the upper limb. [Results] In the overall, male, and female cohorts, the 95% confidence intervals of intra-rater reliabilities (1,1) in the belt-stabilized handheld and isokinetic dynamometers were 0.96-0.98, 0.92-0.97, and 0.81-0.96, 0.82-0.92, 0.73-0.90, and 0.78-0.95, respectively, and the inter-device 95% confidence intervals were 0.52-0.77, 0.28-0.69, and -0.03 to 0.63, respectively. Compared to the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer group, the isokinetic dynamometer group had higher knee-extension muscle strength. [Conclusion] The intra-rater reliability was rated good-to-excellent and moderate-to-excellent for the belt-stabilized handheld and isokinetic dynamometers, respectively. The inter-devices reliability was poor, and isometric knee-extension muscle strength in the isokinetic dynamometer group was higher than that in the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer group.

摘要

[目的] 确定等长伸膝肌力量测量的评估者内和设备间可靠性。[参与者与方法] 77名大学生(50名男性;27名女性)参与研究,他们使用带稳定装置的手持测力计和等速测力计进行了两次等长伸膝肌力量测量。评估者内和设备间可靠性通过让参与者坐在床边,对侧未检查侧脚趾离地,上肢支撑躯干时进行的测量来确定。[结果] 在总体、男性和女性队列中,带稳定装置的手持测力计和等速测力计的评估者内可靠性(1,1)的95%置信区间分别为0.96 - 0.98、0.92 - 0.97和0.81 - 0.96、0.82 - 0.92、0.73 - 0.90以及0.78 - 0.95,设备间95%置信区间分别为0.52 - 0.77、0.28 - 0.69和 - 0.03至0.63。与带稳定装置的手持测力计组相比,等速测力计组的伸膝肌力量更高。[结论] 带稳定装置的手持测力计和等速测力计的评估者内可靠性分别被评为良好至优秀和中等至优秀。设备间可靠性较差,等速测力计组的等长伸膝肌力量高于带稳定装置的手持测力计组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed7/11290865/7af59079ac97/jpts-36-402-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验