Stephens Juliette, Ellis Aleshia, Roberts Susan, Gillespie Kerri, Bannatyne Amy, Branjerdporn Grace
Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Eat Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;33(4):512-536. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2024.2386469. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Pregnancy represents a crucial timepoint to screen for disordered eating due to the significant adverse impact on the woman and her infant. There has been an increased interest in disordered eating in pregnancy since the COVID-19 pandemic, which has disproportionately affected the mental health of pregnant women compared to the general population. This systematic review is an update to a previous review aiming to explore current psychometric evidence for any new pregnancy-specific instruments and other measures of disordered eating developed for non-pregnant populations. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, ProQuest, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Embase from April 2019 to February 2024. A total of 20 citations met criteria for inclusion, with most studies of reasonable quality. Fourteen psychometric instruments were identified, including two new pregnancy-specific screening instruments. Overall, preliminary psychometric evidence for the PEBS, DEAPS, and EDE-PV was promising. There is an ongoing need for validation in different samples, study designs, settings, and administration methods are required. Similar to the original review on this topic, we did not find evidence to support a gold standard recommendation.
由于对女性及其婴儿有重大不利影响，孕期是筛查饮食失调的关键时间点。自新冠疫情以来，人们对孕期饮食失调的关注度有所增加，与普通人群相比，疫情对孕妇心理健康的影响尤为严重。本系统评价是对之前一项评价的更新，旨在探索针对孕期的新工具以及为非孕期人群开发的其他饮食失调测量方法的当前心理测量学证据。2019年4月至2024年2月期间，我们在PubMed、ProQuest、PsycInfo、CINAHL、Scopus、MEDLINE和Embase数据库中进行了系统检索。共有20篇文献符合纳入标准，大多数研究质量合理。我们识别出了14种心理测量工具，其中包括两种新的孕期特异性筛查工具。总体而言，PEBS、DEAPS和EDE-PV的初步心理测量学证据很有前景。仍需要在不同样本中进行验证，并且需要不同的研究设计、环境和实施方法。与关于该主题的原始评价类似，我们没有找到支持金标准推荐的证据。
