Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Transplant. 2024 Dec;24(12):2269-2281. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.031. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
The impact of COVID-19 vaccination on clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remains unclear. This systematic review and network meta-analysis sought to assess the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in SOT recipients. We searched 6 databases from inception to March 1, 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating different COVID-19 vaccination strategies in SOT recipients. Based on patient-important outcomes, we performed frequentist random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, separating RCTs and nonrandomized evidence, and used the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess our certainty in the evidence. We included 6 RCTs (N = 814) and 43 observational studies (N = 125 199). Overall, there is a paucity of randomized evidence evaluating COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. The nonrandomized evidence evaluating COVID-19 vaccination strategies patient-important outcomes, including COVID-19 infection, mortality, hospitalization, ICU admission, and rejection, demonstrated low to very low certainty due to the included studies' risk of bias. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians and SOT recipients worked with minimal, very low-quality evidence in relation to COVID-19 vaccines in this population. In the instance of future public health emergencies, clinicians and researchers should collaborate closely with patient partners to ensure there is sufficient evidence in the transplant population on patient-important outcomes.
COVID-19 疫苗接种对实体器官移植(SOT)受者临床结局的影响尚不清楚。本系统评价和网络荟萃分析旨在评估 COVID-19 疫苗接种在 SOT 受者中的疗效和安全性。我们从建库至 2024 年 3 月 1 日,在 6 个数据库中检索了评估 SOT 受者中不同 COVID-19 疫苗接种策略的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。根据患者重要结局,我们进行了有固定效应的成对荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析,区分 RCT 和非随机证据,并使用推荐评估、制定与评价分级方法评估我们对证据的确定性。我们纳入了 6 项 RCT(N=814)和 43 项观察性研究(N=125199)。总体而言,评估 COVID-19 疫苗在 SOT 受者中应用的随机证据很少。评估 COVID-19 疫苗接种策略患者重要结局(包括 COVID-19 感染、死亡率、住院、入住 ICU 和排斥反应)的非随机证据,由于纳入研究的偏倚风险,其确定性为低到极低。在整个 COVID-19 大流行期间,临床医生和 SOT 受者在该人群中使用 COVID-19 疫苗的证据很少且质量很低。在未来发生公共卫生紧急情况时,临床医生和研究人员应与患者伙伴密切合作,确保在移植人群中针对患者重要结局有足够的证据。