Cancer Epidemiology Unit,Nuffield, Department of Population Health , University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Human Nutrition Research Centre, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):2095. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19209-y.
The associations of vegetarian diets with risks for site-specific cancers have not been estimated reliably due to the low number of vegetarians in previous studies. Therefore, the Cancer Risk in Vegetarians Consortium was established. The aim is to describe and compare the baseline characteristics between non-vegetarian and vegetarian diet groups and between the collaborating studies.
We harmonised individual-level data from 11 prospective cohort studies from Western Europe, North America, South Asia and East Asia. Comparisons of food intakes, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were made between diet groups and between cohorts using descriptive statistics.
2.3 million participants were included; 66% women and 34% men, with mean ages at recruitment of 57 (SD: 7.8) and 57 (8.6) years, respectively. There were 2.1 million meat eaters, 60,903 poultry eaters, 44,780 pescatarians, 81,165 vegetarians, and 14,167 vegans. Food intake differences between the diet groups varied across the cohorts; for example, fruit and vegetable intakes were generally higher in vegetarians than in meat eaters in all the cohorts except in China. BMI was generally lower in vegetarians, particularly vegans, except for the cohorts in India and China. In general, but with some exceptions, vegetarians were also more likely to be highly educated and physically active and less likely to smoke. In the available resurveys, stability of diet groups was high in all the cohorts except in China.
Food intakes and lifestyle factors of both non-vegetarians and vegetarians varied markedly across the individual cohorts, which may be due to differences in both culture and socioeconomic status, as well as differences in questionnaire design. Therefore, care is needed in the interpretation of the impacts of vegetarian diets on cancer risk.
由于以往研究中素食者人数较少,因此无法可靠地评估素食与特定部位癌症风险之间的关联。因此,成立了素食者癌症风险联合会。该联合会旨在描述和比较非素食者和素食者饮食组之间以及合作研究之间的基线特征。
我们对来自西欧、北美、南亚和东亚的 11 项前瞻性队列研究的个体水平数据进行了协调。使用描述性统计方法比较了饮食组之间以及队列之间的食物摄入量、社会人口统计学和生活方式因素。
共纳入 230 万参与者;66%为女性,34%为男性,招募时的平均年龄分别为 57(SD:7.8)岁和 57(8.6)岁。其中有 210 万名肉食者、60903 名禽肉食用者、44780 名食鱼者、81165 名素食者和 14167 名严格素食者。饮食组之间的食物摄入量差异在各个队列中有所不同;例如,除了中国,所有队列中的素食者的水果和蔬菜摄入量普遍高于肉食者。素食者的 BMI 通常较低,尤其是严格素食者,但印度和中国的队列除外。一般来说,但也有一些例外,素食者受教育程度更高,更活跃,吸烟的可能性更小。在现有的再调查中,除了中国,所有队列的饮食组的稳定性都很高。
除中国外,所有队列中,非素食者和素食者的食物摄入量和生活方式因素都有明显差异,这可能是由于文化和社会经济地位的差异以及问卷设计的差异所致。因此,在解释素食对癌症风险的影响时需要谨慎。