• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用ChatGPT算是作弊吗?卫生专业学生的看法。

Is use of ChatGPT cheating? Students of health professions perceptions.

作者信息

Kazley Abby Swanson, Andresen Christine, Mund Angela, Blankenship Clint, Segal Rick

机构信息

Department of Health Care Leadership and Management, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

MUSC Libraries, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2025 May;47(5):894-898. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2385667. Epub 2024 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2385667
PMID:39099009
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to explore student perceptions of generative AI use and cheating in health professions education. The authors sought to understand how students believe generative AI is acceptable to use in coursework.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five faculty members surveyed students across health professions graduate programs using an updated, validated survey instrument. Students anonymously completed the survey online, which took 10-20 min. Data were then tabulated and reported in aggregate form.

RESULTS

Nearly 400 students from twelve academic programs including health and rehabilitation science, occupational therapy, physical therapy, physician assistant studies, speech-language pathology, health administration and health informatics, undergraduate healthcare studies, nurse anesthesiology, and cardiovascular perfusion. The majority of students identify the threat of generative AI to graded assignments such as tests and papers, but many believe it is acceptable to use these tools to learn and study outside of graded assignments.

CONCLUSIONS

Generative AI tools provide new options for students to study and learn. Graduate students in the health professions are currently using generative AI applications but are not universally aware or in agreement of how its use threatens academic integrity. Faculty should provide specific guidance on how generative AI applications may be used.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨学生对生成式人工智能在健康职业教育中的使用及作弊行为的看法。作者试图了解学生认为生成式人工智能在课程作业中如何使用是可接受的。

材料与方法

五名教员使用一份更新的、经过验证的调查问卷,对健康职业研究生项目的学生进行了调查。学生通过在线方式匿名完成调查问卷,该问卷耗时10 - 20分钟。然后对数据进行制表并以汇总形式报告。

结果

来自十二个学术项目的近400名学生参与了调查,这些项目包括健康与康复科学、职业治疗、物理治疗、医师助理研究、言语语言病理学、健康管理与健康信息学、本科医疗保健研究、麻醉护士以及心血管灌注。大多数学生认识到生成式人工智能对诸如考试和论文等评分作业构成的威胁,但许多人认为在评分作业之外使用这些工具来学习和研究是可以接受的。

结论

生成式人工智能工具为学生学习提供了新选择。健康职业的研究生目前正在使用生成式人工智能应用程序,但对于其使用如何威胁学术诚信,他们并非普遍知晓或达成共识。教员应就如何使用生成式人工智能应用程序提供具体指导。

相似文献

1
Is use of ChatGPT cheating? Students of health professions perceptions.使用ChatGPT算是作弊吗?卫生专业学生的看法。
Med Teach. 2025 May;47(5):894-898. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2385667. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
2
Health profession students' perceptions of ChatGPT in healthcare and education: insights from a mixed-methods study.健康专业学生对ChatGPT在医疗保健和教育领域的看法:一项混合方法研究的见解
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 21;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06702-0.
3
Knowledge and use, perceptions of benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence chatbots among Italian physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional national study.意大利物理治疗专业学生对人工智能聊天机器人的了解与使用、对其益处和局限性的认知:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07176-w.
4
Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT by Speech-Language Pathologists and Students.语言病理学家和学生对人工智能及ChatGPT的认知
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jan 7;34(1):174-200. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00218. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
5
Incorporating ChatGPT in Medical Informatics Education: Mixed Methods Study on Student Perceptions and Experiential Integration Proposals.将 ChatGPT 融入医学信息学教育:学生认知和体验融入建议的混合方法研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Mar 20;10:e51151. doi: 10.2196/51151.
6
Perceptions of Cheating Among Students of Health Professions.医疗专业学生对作弊的看法。
J Allied Health. 2024 Spring;53(1):25-31.
7
Increasing Generative Artificial Intelligence Competency among Students Enrolled in Doctoral Nursing Research Coursework.提高博士护理研究课程学生的生成式人工智能能力。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):842-851. doi: 10.1055/a-2373-3151. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
8
Exploring Health Sciences Students' Perspectives on Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study.探索健康科学专业学生对高等教育中使用生成式人工智能的看法:一项定性研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70030. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70030.
9
How do we teach generative artificial intelligence to medical educators? Pilot of a faculty development workshop using ChatGPT.我们如何向医学教育工作者传授生成式人工智能?使用ChatGPT开展的教师发展工作坊试点项目。
Med Teach. 2025 Jan;47(1):160-162. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2341806. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
10
Perceptions and Earliest Experiences of Medical Students and Faculty With ChatGPT in Medical Education: Qualitative Study.医学生和教师在医学教育中对ChatGPT的认知与早期体验:定性研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Feb 20;11:e63400. doi: 10.2196/63400.

引用本文的文献

1
Use and Evaluation of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Medical Students in Japan.日本医学生对生成式人工智能的使用与评估
JMA J. 2025 Jul 15;8(3):730-735. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0375. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Navigating the integration of artificial intelligence in Nursing: Opportunities, challenges, and strategic actions.探索人工智能在护理领域的整合:机遇、挑战及战略行动。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2025 Apr 16;12(3):241-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.04.009. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Knowledge and use, perceptions of benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence chatbots among Italian physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional national study.
意大利物理治疗专业学生对人工智能聊天机器人的了解与使用、对其益处和局限性的认知:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07176-w.
4
Accuracy of latest large language models in answering multiple choice questions in dentistry: A comparative study.最新大语言模型在回答牙科多项选择题方面的准确性:一项比较研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):e0317423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317423. eCollection 2025.