• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)与宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)治疗宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变患者后妊娠结局的差异分析

Differential Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes After Treatment of HIFU and LEEP in Patients with Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

作者信息

Shen Xiao-Ling, Li Zhuo-Yi, Li Qing, Wang Kai

机构信息

Department of Women Health Care, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, People's Republic of China.

Department of Aristogenesis, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2024 Jul 29;16:1285-1291. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S468086. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S468086
PMID:39100108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11296512/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To verify whether there is lower incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment than loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in young women of childbearing age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 46 patients treated with HIFU and 46 patients treated with LEEP. To compare the differences between the two groups, Fisher's exact test or the Kruskal-Wallis (K-W/H) test was used in the univariate analysis, while the logistic regression method was applied for further verification.

RESULTS

Basic characteristics showed no differences between the two groups (P > 0.05) except for parity (P < 0.001). Preterm birth rates were 6.52% and 0.00% in patients with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) treated with LEEP and HIFU, respectively. The incidence rates of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) were respectively 15.22% and 21.74% in the two groups. There was no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to compare the pregnancy outcomes of patients with cervical HSIL who treated with LEEP and HIFU procedures. Both HIFU treatment and LEEP are available options for patients of reproductive age with cervical HSIL. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct prospective single-center or multicenter randomized controlled studies.

摘要

目的

验证在育龄期年轻女性中,高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗后不良妊娠结局的发生率是否低于环形电切术(LEEP)。

患者与方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了46例接受HIFU治疗的患者和46例接受LEEP治疗的患者。为比较两组之间的差异,单因素分析采用Fisher精确检验或Kruskal-Wallis(K-W/H)检验,进一步验证采用逻辑回归方法。

结果

除产次外(P<0.001),两组的基本特征无差异(P>0.05)。接受LEEP和HIFU治疗的宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)患者的早产率分别为6.52%和0.00%。两组的胎膜早破(PROM)发生率分别为15.22%和21.74%。两组的妊娠结局无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

本研究首次比较了接受LEEP和HIFU治疗的宫颈HSIL患者的妊娠结局。对于患有宫颈HSIL的育龄期患者,HIFU治疗和LEEP都是可行的选择。因此,有必要进行前瞻性单中心或多中心随机对照研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd0a/11296512/8bbe8278c7d9/IJWH-16-1285-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd0a/11296512/8c98026e84e9/IJWH-16-1285-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd0a/11296512/8bbe8278c7d9/IJWH-16-1285-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd0a/11296512/8c98026e84e9/IJWH-16-1285-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd0a/11296512/8bbe8278c7d9/IJWH-16-1285-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes After Treatment of HIFU and LEEP in Patients with Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)与宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)治疗宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变患者后妊娠结局的差异分析
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Jul 29;16:1285-1291. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S468086. eCollection 2024.
2
Focused ultrasound versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure to treat women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions under 40: a retrospective study.聚焦超声与环形电切术治疗 40 岁以下宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变的比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11938-y.
3
A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术术后感染分析的对比研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Feb;9(2):949-957. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.34.
4
[Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].[leep术后24个月内宫颈HSIL患者复发情况及其影响因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;54(8):534-540. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.08.006.
5
[Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].[宫颈环形电切术半年后高级别鳞状上皮内病变残留病灶分析的临床结局及高危因素:一项1502例的临床研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 25;52(11):751-756. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.11.007.
6
Recurrent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Excision Procedure Versus Loop Procedure With Top Hat.经宫颈环形电切术与环形电切术加帽式切除术治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变后复发的比较
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2023 Jul 1;27(3):193-197. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000755. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
7
Can We Reduce Overtreatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions?能否减少宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变的过度治疗?
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2022 Jan 1;26(1):20-26. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000635.
8
Clearance of HR-HPV within one year after focused ultrasound or loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with HSIL under 30.30 岁以下 HSIL 患者行聚焦超声或环形电切术后 1 年内 HR-HPV 清除情况。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):15-21. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.2010817.
9
Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.环形电切术锥切术后持续性高级别鳞状上皮内病变的危险因素分析。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2019 Jan;23(1):24-27. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000444.
10
Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变后的妊娠结局
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Jul;272(2):109-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-005-0727-1. Epub 2005 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Focused ultrasound treatment of cervical human papillomavirus infection and squamous intraepithelial lesions: A narrative review.聚焦超声治疗宫颈人乳头瘤病毒感染及鳞状上皮内病变:一项叙述性综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 May 28;26:100406. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100406. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced risk of CIN2+ recurrence in women immunized with a 9-valent HPV vaccine post-excision: Retrospective cohort study.接种 9 价 HPV 疫苗后切除的女性中,CIN2+复发风险降低:回顾性队列研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2343552. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2343552. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Application of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with nanomaterials in anti-tumor therapy.高强度聚焦超声联合纳米材料在抗肿瘤治疗中的应用。
Drug Deliv. 2024 Dec;31(1):2342844. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2024.2342844. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Factors affecting obstetric outcomes in patients who underwent cold-knife and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization due to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.
因宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或宫颈上皮内瘤变3级接受冷刀锥切术和环形电切术锥切的患者中影响产科结局的因素。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2024 Dec 10;25(4):238-246. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2023-1-15. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
4
Risk Factors for Persistence or Recurrence of High-Grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.高危型宫颈鳞状上皮内病变持续或复发的危险因素。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Dec 1;50:e20233537. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233537-en. eCollection 2023.
5
Additional role of ECC in the detection and treatment of cervical HSIL.子宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变检测与治疗中电子阴道镜检查的额外作用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 13;10:1206856. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1206856. eCollection 2023.
6
HPV persistence after cervical surgical excision of high-grade cervical lesions.高级别宫颈病变宫颈手术切除后HPV持续感染情况
Cancer Cytopathol. 2024 May;132(5):268-269. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22760. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
7
Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of focused ultrasound for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.聚焦超声治疗宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变的疗效及妊娠结局。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2023;40(1):2250936. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2250936.
8
Role of HPV in the Prediction of Persistence/Recurrence After Treatment for Cervical Precancer.人乳头瘤病毒在预测宫颈癌前病变治疗后持续存在/复发中的作用。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2023 Oct;45(10):102171. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
9
Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Burden and Standard of Care Treatment Effectiveness and Safety in the United States, 2008-2018: The EACH-WOMAN Project.美国 2008-2018 年的宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变负担和标准护理的治疗效果及安全性:EACH-WOMAN 项目。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2023 Apr 1;27(2):105-112. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000719. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
10
Cervical excisional treatment increases the risk of intraamniotic infection in subsequent pregnancy complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.宫颈切除术会增加因早产胎膜早破而再次妊娠时羊膜腔内感染的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul;229(1):51.e1-51.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.316. Epub 2022 Dec 31.