Differential Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes After Treatment of HIFU and LEEP in Patients with Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

PURPOSE

To verify whether there is lower incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment than loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in young women of childbearing age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 46 patients treated with HIFU and 46 patients treated with LEEP. To compare the differences between the two groups, Fisher's exact test or the Kruskal-Wallis (K-W/H) test was used in the univariate analysis, while the logistic regression method was applied for further verification.

RESULTS

Basic characteristics showed no differences between the two groups (P > 0.05) except for parity (P < 0.001). Preterm birth rates were 6.52% and 0.00% in patients with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) treated with LEEP and HIFU, respectively. The incidence rates of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) were respectively 15.22% and 21.74% in the two groups. There was no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to compare the pregnancy outcomes of patients with cervical HSIL who treated with LEEP and HIFU procedures. Both HIFU treatment and LEEP are available options for patients of reproductive age with cervical HSIL. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct prospective single-center or multicenter randomized controlled studies.