• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们必须讨论研究环境。

We must discuss research environments.

作者信息

Gallacher John, Webster Chris

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Healthy High Density Cities Lab, Department of Urban Planning and Design, HKU Institute of Data Science, HKU Urban Systems Institute, Hong Kong University, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jun 26;11(6):231742. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231742. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.231742
PMID:39100161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11296060/
Abstract

A major challenge facing the biomedical community is creating and sustaining high-quality research environments. A literature search identified five common themes underlying biomedical research environments comprising collaboration, data access, user-led innovation, data provenance and a deep commitment to public and scientific benefit. Club theory is used to develop a model describing social structures that underpin these themes. It is argued that collaboration underlies impactful science and that collaboration is hindered by high transaction costs. This, combined with poorly defined property rights surrounding publicly funded data, limits the ability of data markets to operate efficiently. Although the science community is best placed to provide solutions for these issues, incentivization by funding agencies to increase the benefits of collaboration and reduce uncoordinated activity will be an accelerator. Given the complexity of emerging datasets and the collaborations needed to exploit them, trust-by-design solutions are suggested. The underlying motivational 'glue' that holds this activity together is the aesthetic and ethical value base underlying good science. The model has implications for data-driven science more generally. As biomedical science in the Global South develops, there is an opportunity to address foundational structural issues prospectively rather than inherit unwanted constraints of current practice.

摘要

生物医学界面临的一个主要挑战是创建和维持高质量的研究环境。一项文献检索确定了生物医学研究环境背后的五个共同主题,包括合作、数据获取、用户主导的创新、数据溯源以及对公共利益和科学利益的坚定承诺。俱乐部理论被用于开发一个模型,描述支撑这些主题的社会结构。有人认为,合作是有影响力的科学的基础,而高交易成本阻碍了合作。这一点,再加上围绕公共资助数据的产权界定不清,限制了数据市场有效运作的能力。尽管科学界最有能力为这些问题提供解决方案,但资助机构通过激励措施来增加合作的好处并减少不协调的活动将是一个加速器。鉴于新兴数据集的复杂性以及利用这些数据集所需的合作,建议采用设计信任的解决方案。将这项活动凝聚在一起的潜在激励“粘合剂”是良好科学背后的美学和伦理价值基础。该模型对更广泛的数据驱动科学具有启示意义。随着全球南方生物医学科学的发展,有机会前瞻性地解决基础结构问题,而不是继承当前实践中不必要的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd2/11296060/dfaacd775524/rsos.231742.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd2/11296060/9a6aeb632a0f/rsos.231742.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd2/11296060/e1e7e764e3a1/rsos.231742.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd2/11296060/dfaacd775524/rsos.231742.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd2/11296060/9a6aeb632a0f/rsos.231742.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd2/11296060/e1e7e764e3a1/rsos.231742.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd2/11296060/dfaacd775524/rsos.231742.f003.jpg

相似文献

1
We must discuss research environments.我们必须讨论研究环境。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jun 26;11(6):231742. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231742. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
Qualitative Study定性研究
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.实现医疗机构间合作的途径:一项基于实际证据的系统综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423.
8
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre.英国工程与物理科学研究委员会/生物技术与生物科学研究委员会资助的合成生物学研究中心中的艺术与科学合作。
Nanoethics. 2020;14(1):93-111. doi: 10.1007/s11569-020-00367-3. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
Defining Success in Open Science [version 2; peer review:2 approved].定义开放科学中的成功[第2版;同行评审:2人批准]
MNI Open Res. 2018;2:2. doi: 10.12688/mniopenres.12780.2. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Building Trust in Medical Use of Artificial Intelligence - The Swarm Learning Principle.建立对人工智能医疗应用的信任——群体学习原则。
J CME. 2023 Jan 10;12(1):2162202. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2022.2162202. eCollection 2023.
2
Research-ready data: the C-Surv data model.研究就绪数据:C-Surv 数据模型。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;38(2):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00916-y. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
3
Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: a mixed-methods study.许多研究人员未遵守其公布的数据共享声明:一项混合方法研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.019. Epub 2022 May 30.
4
The Dementias Platform UK (DPUK) Data Portal.英国痴呆症平台(DPUK)数据门户。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;35(6):601-611. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00633-4. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Raising research quality will require collective action.提高研究质量需要集体行动。
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):183. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03750-7.
6
An analysis and metric of reusable data licensing practices for biomedical resources.生物医学资源可重用数据许可实践的分析与度量。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0213090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213090. eCollection 2019.
7
UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age.英国生物银行:一个用于识别多种中老年复杂疾病病因的开放获取资源。
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. eCollection 2015 Mar.
8
On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers.关于准备资助申请的时间:一项对澳大利亚研究人员的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002800.
9
Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey.学术遗传学中的数据隐瞒:一项全国性调查的证据
JAMA. 2002;287(4):473-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.4.473.
10
dbSNP-database for single nucleotide polymorphisms and other classes of minor genetic variation.dbSNP——单核苷酸多态性及其他类型微小遗传变异的数据库。
Genome Res. 1999 Aug;9(8):677-9.