谈乌干达的基因驱动：科学传播对促进参与的必要性。
Talking About Gene Drive in Uganda: The Need for Science Communication to Underpin Engagement.
作者信息
Hartley Sarah, Stelmach Aleksandra, Opesen Chris, Openjuru George Ladaah, Neema Stella
机构信息
University of Exeter, UK.
Makerere University, Uganda.
出版信息
Sci Commun. 2024 Aug;46(4):431-457. doi: 10.1177/10755470241234048. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
Abstract
Uganda may host the world's first field trials of gene drive mosquitoes for malaria control. Global North discourses pre-suppose African publics have access to information about gene drive and are ready to make decisions about its governance. We explore assumptions about the availability of this information in Uganda. We find a paucity of information available combined with a strong desire for information from lay publics. We discuss these findings in the context of Ugandan information infrastructures and political sensitivities to genetic technologies. If Ugandans are to decide about gene drive, they need independent information about the science to underpin engagement.
摘要
乌干达可能会主办世界上首次针对控制疟疾的基因驱动蚊子进行的实地试验。全球北方的论述预先假定非洲公众能够获取有关基因驱动的信息，并准备好就其治理做出决策。我们探究了乌干达关于此类信息可得性的假设。我们发现可获取的信息匮乏，同时普通民众对信息有强烈需求。我们结合乌干达的信息基础设施以及对基因技术的政治敏感性来讨论这些发现。如果乌干达人要对基因驱动做出决策，他们需要关于该科学的独立信息来支撑参与度。
相似文献
1
Talking About Gene Drive in Uganda: The Need for Science Communication to Underpin Engagement.谈乌干达的基因驱动：科学传播对促进参与的必要性。
Sci Commun. 2024 Aug;46(4):431-457. doi: 10.1177/10755470241234048. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Ugandan stakeholder hopes and concerns about gene drive mosquitoes for malaria control: new directions for gene drive risk governance.乌干达利益攸关方对基因驱动蚊子控制疟疾的希望和担忧：基因驱动风险治理的新方向。
Malar J. 2021 Mar 16;20(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03682-6.
3
Procedural legitimacy: co-developing a community agreement model for genetic approaches research to malaria control in Africa.程序合法性：共同制定非洲疟疾控制遗传方法研究的社区协议模型。
Malar J. 2024 Nov 26;23(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05160-1.
4
Moving beyond narrow definitions of gene drive: Diverse perspectives and frames enable substantive dialogue among science and humanities teachers in the United States and United Kingdom.超越狭隘的基因驱动定义：多元化的视角和框架使美国和英国的科学和人文教师之间能够进行实质性的对话。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Aug;32(6):727-744. doi: 10.1177/09636625221148697. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
5
Small-scale release of non-gene drive mosquitoes in Burkina Faso: from engagement implementation to assessment, a learning journey.布基纳法索小规模释放非基因驱动蚊子：从参与实施到评估的学习之旅。
Malar J. 2021 Oct 9;20(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03929-2.
6
Communicating science in social settings.在社会环境中传播科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14040-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213275110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
7
From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.从“信任我们”到参与式治理：协商性公众与科学政策。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):48-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662512472160.
8
Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.生态效度与公众研究：有机公众参与方法的实例
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):77-91. doi: 10.1177/0963662513493575. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Operationalizing stakeholder engagement for gene drive research in malaria elimination in Africa-translating guidance into practice.将利益相关者参与付诸实践，以促进非洲消除疟疾中的基因驱动研究——将指导意见转化为实践。
Malar J. 2022 Jul 23;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04241-3.
10
Experimenting with co-development: A qualitative study of gene drive research for malaria control in Mali.合作开发实验：马里疟疾控制基因驱动研究的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;276:113850. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113850. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
引用本文的文献
1
Navigating biosafety regulatory frameworks for genetic engineering in Africa: a focus on genome editing and gene drive technologies.非洲基因工程生物安全监管框架解读：聚焦基因组编辑和基因驱动技术
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Oct 24;12:1483279. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1483279. eCollection 2024.
本文引用的文献
1
Operationalizing stakeholder engagement for gene drive research in malaria elimination in Africa-translating guidance into practice.将利益相关者参与付诸实践，以促进非洲消除疟疾中的基因驱动研究——将指导意见转化为实践。
Malar J. 2022 Jul 23;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04241-3.
2
Trust or attention? Medialization of science revisited.信任还是关注？重新审视科学的媒介化。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Apr;31(3):288-296. doi: 10.1177/09636625211070888.
3
Gene Drives in the U.K., U.S., and Australian Press (2015-2019): How a New Focus on Responsibility Is Shaping Science Communication.英国、美国和澳大利亚媒体对基因驱动的报道（2015 - 2019年）：对责任的新关注如何塑造科学传播。
Sci Commun. 2022 Apr;44(2):143-168. doi: 10.1177/10755470211072245. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
4
Mark-release-recapture experiment in Burkina Faso demonstrates reduced fitness and dispersal of genetically-modified sterile malaria mosquitoes.布基纳法索的释放-再捕获实验表明，遗传改良的不育疟疾蚊子的适应能力和扩散能力下降。
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 10;13(1):796. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28419-0.
5
Articulating ethical principles guiding Target Malaria's engagement strategy.阐明指导目标疟疾参与战略的伦理原则。
Malar J. 2022 Feb 5;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04062-4.
6
Does Gene Editing in the Wild Require Broad Public Deliberation?在野外进行基因编辑是否需要广泛的公众讨论？
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Nov;51 Suppl 2:S34-S41. doi: 10.1002/hast.1318.
7
Public engagement with science-Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy.公众参与科学——学术文献和科学政策中的起源、动机和影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 7;16(7):e0254201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254201. eCollection 2021.
8
Governing Gene Drive Technologies: A Qualitative Interview Study.管控基因驱动技术：一项定性访谈研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):107-124. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1941417. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
9
Experimenting with co-development: A qualitative study of gene drive research for malaria control in Mali.合作开发实验：马里疟疾控制基因驱动研究的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;276:113850. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113850. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
10
Ugandan stakeholder hopes and concerns about gene drive mosquitoes for malaria control: new directions for gene drive risk governance.乌干达利益攸关方对基因驱动蚊子控制疟疾的希望和担忧：基因驱动风险治理的新方向。
Malar J. 2021 Mar 16;20(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03682-6.
Zotero 插件