Nyhoegen Christin, Bonhoeffer Sebastian, Uecker Hildegard
Research Group Stochastic Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Theoretical Biology Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology Plon Germany.
Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Evol Appl. 2024 Aug 2;17(8):e13764. doi: 10.1111/eva.13764. eCollection 2024 Aug.
In combination therapy, bacteria are challenged with two or more antibiotics simultaneously. Ideally, separate mutations are required to adapt to each of them, which is a priori expected to hinder the evolution of full resistance. Yet, the success of this strategy ultimately depends on how well the combination controls the growth of bacteria with and without resistance mutations. To design a combination treatment, we need to choose drugs and their doses and decide how many drugs get mixed. Which combinations are good? To answer this question, we set up a stochastic pharmacodynamic model and determine the probability to successfully eradicate a bacterial population. We consider bacteriostatic and two types of bactericidal drugs-those that kill independent of replication and those that kill during replication. To establish results for a null model, we consider non-interacting drugs and implement the two most common models for drug independence-Loewe additivity and Bliss independence. Our results show that combination therapy is almost always better in limiting the evolution of resistance than administering just one drug, even though we keep the total drug dose constant for a 'fair' comparison. Yet, exceptions exist for drugs with steep dose-response curves. Combining a bacteriostatic and a bactericidal drug which can kill non-replicating cells is particularly beneficial. Our results suggest that a 50:50 drug ratio-even if not always optimal-is usually a good and safe choice. Applying three or four drugs is beneficial for treatment of strains with large mutation rates but adding more drugs otherwise only provides a marginal benefit or even a disadvantage. By systematically addressing key elements of treatment design, our study provides a basis for future models which take further factors into account. It also highlights conceptual challenges with translating the traditional concepts of drug independence to the single-cell level.
在联合治疗中,细菌同时受到两种或更多种抗生素的作用。理想情况下,需要不同的突变来适应每种抗生素,这在理论上预计会阻碍完全耐药性的进化。然而,这种策略的成功最终取决于联合用药对有耐药突变和无耐药突变细菌生长的控制效果。为了设计联合治疗方案,我们需要选择药物及其剂量,并决定混合使用多少种药物。哪些联合用药效果好呢?为了回答这个问题,我们建立了一个随机药效学模型,并确定成功根除细菌群体的概率。我们考虑了抑菌药物和两种杀菌药物——一种是与复制无关的杀菌药物,另一种是在复制过程中发挥杀菌作用的药物。为了建立一个零模型的结果,我们考虑非相互作用的药物,并采用两种最常见的药物独立性模型——洛伊相加性和布利斯独立性。我们的结果表明,即使为了“公平”比较而保持总药物剂量不变,联合治疗在限制耐药性进化方面几乎总是比单一用药更好。然而,对于剂量反应曲线陡峭的药物存在例外情况。联合使用一种抑菌药物和一种能杀死非复制细胞的杀菌药物特别有益。我们的结果表明,50:50的药物比例——即使不总是最优的——通常是一个不错且安全的选择。应用三种或四种药物对高突变率菌株的治疗有益,但除此之外增加更多药物只会带来边际效益甚至不利影响。通过系统地解决治疗设计的关键要素,我们的研究为未来考虑更多因素的模型提供了基础。它还凸显了将传统的药物独立性概念转化到单细胞水平时所面临的概念性挑战。