Han Yanting, Adolphs Ralph
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
iScience. 2024 Jun 24;27(7):110378. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110378. eCollection 2024 Jul 19.
Our knowledge of the diversity and psychological organization of emotion experiences is based primarily on studies that used a single type of stimulus with an often limited set of rating scales and analyses. Here we take a comprehensive data-driven approach. We surveyed 1,000+ participants on a diverse set of ratings of emotion experiences to a validated set of ca. 150 text narratives, a validated set of ca. 1,000 videos, and over 10,000 personal experiences sampled longitudinally in everyday life, permitting a unique comparison. All three types of emotion experiences were characterized by similar dimensional spaces that included valence and arousal, as well as dimensions related to generalizability. Emotion experiences were distributed along continuous gradients, with no clear clusters even for the so-called basic emotions. Individual differences in personality traits were associated with differences in everyday emotion experiences but not with emotions evoked by narratives or videos.
我们对情绪体验的多样性和心理组织的了解主要基于一些研究，这些研究使用单一类型的刺激，且通常使用一套有限的评分量表和分析方法。在这里，我们采用一种全面的数据驱动方法。我们对1000多名参与者进行了调查，内容涉及对大约150篇经过验证的文本叙述、大约1000个经过验证的视频以及在日常生活中纵向抽样的10000多个个人经历所产生的情绪体验进行多样化评分，从而实现了独特的比较。所有这三种类型的情绪体验都具有相似的维度空间，包括效价和唤醒度，以及与普遍性相关的维度。情绪体验是沿着连续的梯度分布的，即使对于所谓的基本情绪也没有明显的聚类。人格特质的个体差异与日常情绪体验的差异相关，但与由叙述或视频引发的情绪无关。
