• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用一组有代表性的英文特质词,可以从面部特征中得出四个维度的归因。

Four dimensions characterize attributions from faces using a representative set of English trait words.

机构信息

Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 27;12(1):5168. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25500-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-25500-y
PMID:34453054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8397784/
Abstract

People readily (but often inaccurately) attribute traits to others based on faces. While the details of attributions depend on the language available to describe social traits, psychological theories argue that two or three dimensions (such as valence and dominance) summarize social trait attributions from faces. However, prior work has used only a small number of trait words (12 to 18), limiting conclusions to date. In two large-scale, preregistered studies we ask participants to rate 100 faces (obtained from existing face stimuli sets), using a list of 100 English trait words that we derived using deep neural network analysis of words that have been used by other participants in prior studies to describe faces. In study 1 we find that these attributions are best described by four psychological dimensions, which we interpret as "warmth", "competence", "femininity", and "youth". In study 2 we partially reproduce these four dimensions using the same stimuli among additional participant raters from multiple regions around the world, in both aggregated and individual-level data. These results provide a comprehensive characterization of trait attributions from faces, although we note our conclusions are limited by the scope of our study (in particular we note only white faces and English trait words were included).

摘要

人们根据面孔很容易(但通常不准确)将特征归因于他人。虽然归因的细节取决于可用的语言来描述社会特征,但心理学理论认为,两个或三个维度(如效价和支配地位)可以概括来自面孔的社会特征归因。然而,之前的工作仅使用了少量的特征词(12 到 18 个),这限制了迄今为止的结论。在两项大规模的、预先注册的研究中,我们要求参与者使用我们通过对其他参与者在之前研究中用来描述面孔的单词进行深度神经网络分析而得出的 100 个英语特征词列表,对 100 张面孔进行评分。在研究 1 中,我们发现这些归因可以最好地用四个心理学维度来描述,我们将其解释为“温暖”、“能力”、“女性化”和“年轻”。在研究 2 中,我们在来自世界各地多个地区的额外参与者评分者中使用相同的刺激物,在聚合和个体层面的数据中部分重现了这四个维度。这些结果提供了对来自面孔的特征归因的全面描述,尽管我们注意到我们的结论受到研究范围的限制(特别是我们只注意到包括了白人面孔和英语特征词)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/d997907e809d/41467_2021_25500_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/13ace6fab440/41467_2021_25500_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/b2285675a3d6/41467_2021_25500_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/2741e9a728c8/41467_2021_25500_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/828532b16b5f/41467_2021_25500_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/8f83d6cdb031/41467_2021_25500_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/abd70c6a45a5/41467_2021_25500_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/d997907e809d/41467_2021_25500_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/13ace6fab440/41467_2021_25500_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/b2285675a3d6/41467_2021_25500_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/2741e9a728c8/41467_2021_25500_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/828532b16b5f/41467_2021_25500_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/8f83d6cdb031/41467_2021_25500_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/abd70c6a45a5/41467_2021_25500_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/8397784/d997907e809d/41467_2021_25500_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Four dimensions characterize attributions from faces using a representative set of English trait words.使用一组有代表性的英文特质词,可以从面部特征中得出四个维度的归因。
Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 27;12(1):5168. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25500-y.
2
Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.面部的性别和刻板印象会影响对面部特征的评价:与刻板印象相悖的女性面孔会得到负面评价。
Br J Psychol. 2015 May;106(2):186-208. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12085. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
3
Valence, arousal, and dominance ratings for facial stimuli.面部刺激的效价、唤醒度和优势度评分。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):2046-2055. doi: 10.1177/1747021819829012. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
4
Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images.从高度变化的面部图像中建模第一印象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 12;111(32):E3353-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409860111. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
5
Laterality for recognizing written words and faces in the fusiform gyrus covaries with language dominance.梭状回中识别书写文字和面孔的偏侧性与语言优势相关。
Cortex. 2019 Aug;117:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
6
Inferring character from faces: a developmental study.从面部推断性格:一项发展性研究。
Psychol Sci. 2014 May 1;25(5):1132-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797614523297. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
7
Social Trait Information in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Trained for Face Identification.深度卷积神经网络在人脸识别训练中所获取的社交特质信息。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Jun;43(6):e12729. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12729.
8
Integrating social and facial models of person perception: Converging and diverging dimensions.整合人际知觉的社会与面部模型:趋同与分歧维度
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Understanding facial impressions between and within identities.理解身份之间和内部的面部印象。
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:184-198. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Decoding the language of first impressions: Comparing models of first impressions of faces derived from free-text descriptions and trait ratings.解读第一印象的语言:比较从自由文本描述和特质评级得出的面部第一印象模型。
Br J Psychol. 2024 Jun 17. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12717.

引用本文的文献

1
Network models reveal high-dimensional social inferences in naturalistic settings beyond latent construct models.网络模型揭示了超越潜在结构模型的自然环境中的高维社会推理。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;3(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00275-w.
2
Feature-based encoding of face identity by single neurons in the human amygdala and hippocampus.人类杏仁核和海马体中单个神经元对面部身份的基于特征的编码。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02218-1.
3
Face value: The effect of facial aesthetic treatment on first impressions and partner preferences.

本文引用的文献

1
To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?社会知觉的价-域模型适用于哪些世界区域?
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):159-169. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Towards a Cognitive Science of the Human: Cross-Cultural Approaches and Their Urgency.迈向人类认知科学:跨文化方法及其紧迫性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):620-638. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes.
票面价值:面部美容治疗对第一印象和伴侣偏好的影响。
Perception. 2025 Sep;54(9):651-673. doi: 10.1177/03010066251337353. Epub 2025 May 26.
4
The conceptual structure of human relationships across modern and historical cultures.现代与历史文化中人际关系的概念结构。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02122-8.
5
Face evaluation: Findings, methods, and challenges.面部评估:研究结果、方法与挑战。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Mar;1545(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15293. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
6
Interracial contact shapes racial bias in the learning of person-knowledge.跨种族接触在个人知识学习中塑造种族偏见。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jan 21;3(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00187-9.
7
How trait impressions of faces shape subsequent mental state inferences.面部特征印象如何塑造后续的心理状态推断。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jan;9(1):208-226. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02059-4. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
8
A Multidimensional Neural Representation of Face Impressions.面孔印象的多维神经表示。
J Neurosci. 2024 Sep 25;44(39):e0542242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0542-24.2024.
9
A shared structure for emotion experiences from narratives, videos, and everyday life.来自叙事、视频和日常生活的情感体验的共享结构。
iScience. 2024 Jun 24;27(7):110378. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110378. eCollection 2024 Jul 19.
10
Intracranial EEG signals disentangle multi-areal neural dynamics of vicarious pain perception.颅内 EEG 信号可解析替代性疼痛感知的多区域神经动力学。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 18;15(1):5203. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49541-1.
个体在信任评价上的差异主要是由环境而不是基因塑造的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 12;117(19):10218-10224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920131117. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
Quantifying idiosyncratic and shared contributions to judgment.量化判断的个体差异和共同贡献。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Aug;52(4):1428-1444. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01323-0.
5
Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure.情绪语义既表现出文化差异,也表现出普遍结构。
Science. 2019 Dec 20;366(6472):1517-1522. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8160.
6
The neural representation of facial-emotion categories reflects conceptual structure.面部表情类别的神经表示反映了概念结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 6;116(32):15861-15870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816408116. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
Gender biases in impressions from faces: Empirical studies and computational models.面孔印象中的性别偏见:实证研究与计算模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Feb;149(2):323-342. doi: 10.1037/xge0000638. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
Testing the functional basis of first impressions: Dimensions for children's faces are not the same as for adults' faces.测试第一印象的功能基础:儿童面部的维度与成人面部的维度不同。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):900-924. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000167. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
9
Understanding facial impressions between and within identities.理解身份之间和内部的面部印象。
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:184-198. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Do facial first impressions reflect a shared social reality?面部第一印象是否反映了共同的社会现实?
Br J Psychol. 2020 May;111(2):215-232. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12390. Epub 2019 Mar 29.