Nihalani Shrey, Cruz Francis, Hawkins Jacob K, Griswold Branum Gage, Mabry Scott E, McGwin Gerald, Gilbert Shawn R, Conklin Michael J
Children's Hospital of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J Child Orthop. 2024 Jun 17;18(4):399-403. doi: 10.1177/18632521241262167. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Septic arthritis of the hip in children and adolescents is a common condition requiring timely diagnosis and intervention. Surgical irrigation and debridement is typically performed through the anterior approach because of concerns about injury to the medial femoral circumflex artery leading to avascular necrosis. While there are multiple studies investigating the sequelae of anterior and medial approaches for reduction of developmental dislocation of the hip, none have compared these approaches for the pediatric septic hip. We hypothesize that there will be no significant difference in the rate of avascular necrosis when comparing the medial and anterior approaches to the septic hip in pediatric patients.
A retrospective review was performed of pediatric septic hips treated with irrigation and debridement through either a medial or anterior approach at a single institution over an 18-year period of time. The primary outcome measure was the development of avascular necrosis.
Thirteen of 164 patients (7.9%) developed avascular necrosis. Avascular necrosis was noted in 9 of 101 patients who had anterior approach and 4 of 63 patients who underwent medial approach (p = 0.76). The average age for patients developing avascular necrosis was 10.0 years old versus 6.8 years old in patients who did not develop avascular necrosis (p = 0.01). The average follow-up was 3.3 years in patients with avascular necrosis versus 1.5 years for patients who did not develop avascular necrosis (p = 0.01).
Medial approach to the pediatric septic hip does not increase the rate of avascular necrosis compared to the anterior approach.
Retrospective comparison study, Level III.
儿童和青少年的髋关节化脓性关节炎是一种常见疾病,需要及时诊断和干预。由于担心损伤旋股内侧动脉导致股骨头缺血性坏死,手术冲洗和清创通常通过前路进行。虽然有多项研究调查了前路和内侧入路治疗发育性髋关节脱位的后遗症,但尚无研究比较这两种入路用于小儿化脓性髋关节的情况。我们假设,在比较小儿化脓性髋关节的内侧入路和前路时,股骨头缺血性坏死的发生率没有显著差异。
对一家机构在18年期间采用内侧或前路冲洗和清创治疗的小儿化脓性髋关节进行回顾性研究。主要观察指标是股骨头缺血性坏死的发生情况。
164例患者中有13例(7.9%)发生股骨头缺血性坏死。前路手术的101例患者中有9例出现股骨头缺血性坏死,内侧入路的63例患者中有4例出现股骨头缺血性坏死(p = 0.76)。发生股骨头缺血性坏死的患者平均年龄为10.0岁,未发生股骨头缺血性坏死的患者平均年龄为6.8岁(p = 0.01)。发生股骨头缺血性坏死的患者平均随访3.3年,未发生股骨头缺血性坏死的患者平均随访1.5年(p = 0.01)。
与前路相比,小儿化脓性髋关节的内侧入路不会增加股骨头缺血性坏死的发生率。
回顾性比较研究,三级。