Suppr超能文献

在神经重症监护中通过电阻抗断层扫描比较标准与个体化呼气末正压(PEEP):一项前瞻性单中心试点研究。

Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study.

作者信息

Spatenkova Vera, Mlcek Mikulas, Mejstrik Alan, Cisar Lukas, Kuriscak Eduard

机构信息

Neurocenter, Neurointensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital Liberec, Husova 357/10, 460 01, Liberec, Czech Republic.

Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Aug 5;12(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00654-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individualised bedside adjustment of mechanical ventilation is a standard strategy in acute coma neurocritical care patients. This involves customising positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which could improve ventilation homogeneity and arterial oxygenation. This study aimed to determine whether PEEP titrated by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) results in different lung ventilation homogeneity when compared to standard PEEP of 5 cmHO in mechanically ventilated patients with healthy lungs.

METHODS

In this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated 55 acute adult neurocritical care patients starting controlled ventilation with PEEPs close to 5 cmHO. Next, the optimal PEEP was identified by EIT-guided decremental PEEP titration, probing PEEP levels between 9 and 2 cmHO and finding the minimal amount of collapse and overdistension. EIT-derived parameters of ventilation homogeneity were evaluated before and after the PEEP titration and after the adjustment of PEEP to its optimal value. Non-EIT-based parameters, such as peripheral capillary Hb saturation (SpO) and end-tidal pressure of CO, were recorded hourly and analysed before PEEP titration and after PEEP adjustment.

RESULTS

The mean PEEP value before titration was 4.75 ± 0.94 cmHO (ranging from 3 to max 8 cmHO), 4.29 ± 1.24 cmHO after titration and before PEEP adjustment, and 4.26 ± 1.5 cmHO after PEEP adjustment. No statistically significant differences in ventilation homogeneity were observed due to the adjustment of PEEP found by PEEP titration. We also found non-significant changes in non-EIT-based parameters following the PEEP titration and subsequent PEEP adjustment, except for the mean arterial pressure, which dropped statistically significantly (with a mean difference of 3.2 mmHg, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.0 cmHO, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adjusting PEEP to values derived from PEEP titration guided by EIT does not provide any significant changes in ventilation homogeneity as assessed by EIT to ventilated patients with healthy lungs, provided the change in PEEP does not exceed three cmHO. Thus, a reduction in PEEP determined through PEEP titration that is not greater than 3 cmHO from an initial value of 5 cmHO is unlikely to affect ventilation homogeneity significantly, which could benefit mechanically ventilated neurocritical care patients.

摘要

背景

对急性昏迷神经重症患者进行个性化床边机械通气调整是一种标准策略。这包括定制呼气末正压(PEEP),这可能会改善通气均匀性和动脉氧合。本研究旨在确定与健康肺机械通气患者标准5 cmH₂O的PEEP相比,通过电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)滴定的PEEP是否会导致不同的肺通气均匀性。

方法

在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,我们评估了55例开始进行接近5 cmH₂O的PEEP控制通气的急性成年神经重症患者。接下来,通过EIT引导的递减PEEP滴定确定最佳PEEP,探测9至2 cmH₂O之间的PEEP水平,并找到塌陷和过度扩张的最小量。在PEEP滴定前后以及将PEEP调整至最佳值后,评估EIT得出的通气均匀性参数。每小时记录基于非EIT的参数,如外周毛细血管血红蛋白饱和度(SpO₂)和呼气末CO₂分压,并在PEEP滴定前和PEEP调整后进行分析。

结果

滴定前的平均PEEP值为4.75±0.94 cmH₂O(范围为3至最大8 cmH₂O),滴定后且在PEEP调整前为4.29±1.24 cmH₂O,PEEP调整后为4.26±1.5 cmH₂O。由于通过PEEP滴定发现的PEEP调整,未观察到通气均匀性有统计学显著差异。我们还发现,在PEEP滴定及随后的PEEP调整后,基于非EIT的参数除平均动脉压有统计学显著下降外(平均差异为3.2 mmHg,95% CI 0.45至6.0 cmH₂O,p < 0.001),均无显著变化。

结论

对于健康肺的机械通气患者,将PEEP调整为EIT引导的PEEP滴定得出的值,在通过EIT评估的通气均匀性方面不会产生任何显著变化,前提是PEEP的变化不超过3 cmH₂O。因此,从初始值5 cmH₂O通过PEEP滴定确定的PEEP降低不超过3 cmH₂O不太可能显著影响通气均匀性,这可能对机械通气的神经重症患者有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ded8/11300775/7470b8f93b8b/40635_2024_654_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验