Mazurenko Olena, O'Brien Emer, Beug Anna, Smith Susan M, McCarthy Caroline
Department of Health Policy & Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health - Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14118. doi: 10.1111/jep.14118. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
RATIONALE: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a leading driver of disability. Primary care clinicians treat most patients with CNCP. Yet, they are often unable to identify appropriate pain treatments, mainly due to concerns about the safety and effectiveness of available medications. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can be useful tools to guide primary care clinicians in selecting pain treatments based on the best available evidence. OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review of CPGs that address the management of adults with CNCP, regardless of underlying condition type, in primary care. METHOD: We systematically reviewed and synthesised current CPGs for managing adults with CNCP in primary care (2013-2023). We followed a stepwise systematic process to synthesise key CPG recommendations: extracted and analysed each recommendation, synthesised by compiling similar recommendations using a thematic analysis approach, and assessed the strength of CPG recommendations to create a final, unified set of recommendations. We focused on identifying CPGs containing recommendations on the following topics: (a) opioid pain management, (b) non-opioid pharmacological pain management, (c) non-pharmacological pain management, and (d) patient-centred communication around pain management, prevention, and organisation of care. RESULTS: We included 13 CPGs, 8 of which focused solely on use of opioids, emphasising the lack of long-term effectiveness and safety concerns, being mainly based on the expert consensus. As an exception, high-quality evidence recommended referring patients with suspected opioid use disorder to specialist addiction services for medication-assisted treatment. Recommendations for non-opioid pain management were often contradictory and based on the expert consensus. Patient-centred pain management combined with exercise-based interventions and psychological therapies are appropriate strategies for managing patients with CNCP. CONCLUSION: Most CPGs focused on opioid management, with contradictory recommendations for non-opioid management based on low-quality evidence. Additional research is needed to strengthen the evidence for using non-opioid and non-pharmacological interventions to manage patients with CNCP.
理论依据:慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)是导致残疾的主要原因。初级保健临床医生诊治大多数CNCP患者。然而,他们往往无法确定合适的疼痛治疗方法,主要是因为担心现有药物的安全性和有效性。临床实践指南(CPG)可以作为有用的工具,指导初级保健临床医生根据现有最佳证据选择疼痛治疗方法。 目的:对涉及初级保健中成人CNCP管理的CPG进行系统评价,无论其潜在病症类型如何。 方法:我们系统回顾并综合了2013 - 2023年期间用于初级保健中成人CNCP管理的现行CPG。我们遵循逐步系统的流程来综合关键CPG建议:提取并分析每条建议,通过主题分析方法汇编相似建议进行综合,并评估CPG建议的强度以创建最终统一的建议集。我们专注于识别包含以下主题建议的CPG:(a)阿片类药物疼痛管理,(b)非阿片类药物疼痛管理,(c)非药物疼痛管理,以及(d)围绕疼痛管理、预防和护理组织的以患者为中心的沟通。 结果:我们纳入了13份CPG,其中8份仅专注于阿片类药物的使用,强调其缺乏长期有效性且存在安全问题,主要基于专家共识。作为例外,高质量证据建议将疑似阿片类药物使用障碍的患者转诊至专科成瘾服务机构进行药物辅助治疗。非阿片类药物疼痛管理的建议往往相互矛盾且基于专家共识。以患者为中心的疼痛管理结合基于运动的干预措施和心理治疗是管理CNCP患者的合适策略。 结论:大多数CPG专注于阿片类药物管理,非阿片类药物管理的建议相互矛盾且证据质量低。需要进一步研究以加强使用非阿片类药物和非药物干预措施管理CNCP患者的证据。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021-4
Br J Pain. 2023-6
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023-4-14
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022-11-4
Lancet. 2021-5-29