• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于初级保健的阿片类药物和疼痛审查服务的可接受性:英格兰的一项混合方法评估。

Acceptability of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in England.

机构信息

NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; South Gloucestershire Council, Bristol.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jan 30;70(691):e120-e129. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706097. Print 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp19X706097
PMID:31594772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6783137/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary care opioid prescribing to treat chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) has progressively increased despite a lack of evidence for long-term safety and effectiveness. Developing primary care interventions to reduce opioid dependence in patients with CNCP is a public health priority.

AIM

To report the acceptability of the South Gloucestershire pain and opioid review service for patients with CNCP, which aimed to help patients understand their relationship with prescribed opioids and support non-drug-based pain management strategies.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A mixed-methods evaluation was performed on the service, which was based in two GP practices in South Gloucestershire, England, and delivered by project workers.

METHOD

Descriptive data were collected on delivered-within-service and community-based interventions. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews ( = 18 patients, = 7 service providers) explored experiences of the service.

RESULTS

The enrolment process, person-centred primary care-based delivery, and service content focused on psychological issues underlying CNCP were found to be acceptable to patients and service providers. Patients welcomed having time to discuss their pain, its management, and related psychological issues. Maintaining a long-term approach was desired as CNCP is a complex issue that takes time to address. GPs recommended that funding was needed to ensure they have dedicated time to support a similar service and to ensure that project workers received adequate clinical supervision.

CONCLUSION

This service model was acceptable and may be a useful means to manage patients with CNCP who develop opioid dependence after long-term use of opioids. A randomised controlled trial is needed to formally test the effectiveness of the service.

摘要

背景

尽管缺乏长期安全性和有效性的证据,初级保健阿片类药物处方治疗慢性非癌症疼痛(CNCP)的情况仍在逐渐增加。制定减少 CNCP 患者阿片类药物依赖的初级保健干预措施是公共卫生的重点。

目的

报告南格洛斯特郡疼痛和阿片类药物审查服务对 CNCP 患者的可接受性,该服务旨在帮助患者了解他们与处方阿片类药物的关系,并支持非药物性疼痛管理策略。

设计和设置

对该服务进行了混合方法评估,该服务位于英格兰南格洛斯特郡的两个全科医生实践中,由项目工作人员提供。

方法

收集了服务内和社区干预措施的交付情况描述性数据。对 25 名半结构化访谈(=18 名患者,=7 名服务提供者)进行了探索性研究,以了解他们对该服务的体验。

结果

患者和服务提供者都认为,该服务的招募流程、以患者为中心的初级保健服务提供方式以及针对 CNCP 潜在心理问题的服务内容是可以接受的。患者欢迎有时间讨论他们的疼痛、疼痛管理以及相关的心理问题。由于 CNCP 是一个复杂的问题,需要时间来解决,因此需要保持长期的治疗方法。全科医生建议需要提供资金,以确保他们有专门的时间来支持类似的服务,并确保项目工作人员获得足够的临床监督。

结论

该服务模式是可以接受的,可能是管理长期使用阿片类药物后出现阿片类药物依赖的 CNCP 患者的一种有用方法。需要进行随机对照试验来正式检验该服务的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/77b801894e10/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/128f1868033f/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/1b5b5fa1cac4/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/77b801894e10/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/128f1868033f/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/1b5b5fa1cac4/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/77b801894e10/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptability of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in England.基于初级保健的阿片类药物和疼痛审查服务的可接受性:英格兰的一项混合方法评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jan 30;70(691):e120-e129. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706097. Print 2020 Feb.
2
Evaluation of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in two GP practices in England.基于初级保健的阿片类药物和疼痛审查服务的评估:英格兰两家全科医生实践中的混合方法评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jan 30;70(691):e111-e119. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707237. Print 2020 Feb.
3
GPs prescribing of strong opioid drugs for patients with chronic non-cancer pain: a qualitative study.全科医生为慢性非癌性疼痛患者开具强效阿片类药物的情况:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):e821-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675403.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Health service utilisation by people living with chronic non-cancer pain: findings from the Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study.慢性非癌性疼痛患者的医疗服务利用情况:疼痛与阿片类药物治疗(POINT)研究的结果
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Nov;40(5):490-499. doi: 10.1071/AH15047.
6
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Survey of Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain in Taiwan-Comparison of Pain and Non-Pain Physicians.台湾慢性非癌性疼痛处方阿片类药物的知识、态度与实践调查——疼痛科与非疼痛科医生的比较
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2397-2410. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw189.
7
Multimodal Local Opioid Prescribing Intervention Outcomes in Chronic Noncancer Pain Management.多模式局部阿片类药物处方干预在慢性非癌性疼痛管理中的效果。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):559-566. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180296.
8
Sources and Impact of Time Pressure on Opioid Management in the Safety-Net.安全网中时间压力对阿片类药物管理的来源及影响
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):375-382. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180306.
9
Recommendations for managing adults with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: A systematic clinical guideline review.基层医疗中慢性非癌性疼痛成人患者管理建议:系统临床指南综述
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14118. doi: 10.1111/jep.14118. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
10
Perspectives of pain specialists, patients, and family members on long-term opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain: a qualitative study.疼痛专家、患者和家属对慢性非癌性疼痛长期使用阿片类药物的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov 9;21(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01501-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Collaboration between adult patients and practitioners when making decisions about prescribing opioid medicines for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a scoping review.成人患者与从业者在基层医疗中就慢性非癌性疼痛开具阿片类药物的决策时的协作:一项范围综述。
Br J Pain. 2022 Feb;16(1):119-126. doi: 10.1177/20494637211025560. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
2
A pharmacist-led intervention to improve the management of opioids in a general practice: a qualitative evaluation of participant interviews.药剂师主导的干预措施改善一般实践中的阿片类药物管理:对参与者访谈的定性评估。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Feb;44(1):235-246. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01340-0. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in two GP practices in England.基于初级保健的阿片类药物和疼痛审查服务的评估:英格兰两家全科医生实践中的混合方法评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jan 30;70(691):e111-e119. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707237. Print 2020 Feb.
2
Opioid prescribing trends and geographical variation in England, 1998-2018: a retrospective database study.1998 - 2018年英格兰阿片类药物处方趋势及地理差异:一项回顾性数据库研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;6(2):140-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30471-1. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
3
Opioids and chronic pain in primary care.
Opioids in the United Kingdom: safety and surveillance during COVID-19.
英国的阿片类药物:在 COVID-19 期间的安全性和监测。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;34(4):357-362. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000719.
4
Analgesic Opioid Misuse and Opioid Use Disorder among Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain and Prescribed Opioids in a Pain Centre in France.法国某疼痛中心慢性非癌痛患者阿片类药物滥用和阿片类药物使用障碍与处方阿片类药物
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 21;18(4):2097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042097.
5
Evaluation of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in two GP practices in England.基于初级保健的阿片类药物和疼痛审查服务的评估:英格兰两家全科医生实践中的混合方法评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jan 30;70(691):e111-e119. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707237. Print 2020 Feb.
基层医疗中的阿片类药物与慢性疼痛
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Oct;68(675):454-455. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X698921.
4
Managing addiction to prescribed opioids: the job of general practice?应对处方阿片类药物成瘾:这是全科医疗的工作吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Sep;68(674):426-427. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X698597.
5
Delivering a primary care-based social prescribing initiative: a qualitative study of the benefits and challenges.提供基于初级保健的社会处方计划:一项关于效益和挑战的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jul;68(672):e487-e494. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X696617. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
Concerns and Help-Seeking Among Patients Using Opioids for Management of Chronic Noncancer Pain.慢性非癌性疼痛患者使用阿片类药物治疗的担忧和寻求帮助。
Pain Med. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):758-769. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny078.
7
The impact of buprenorphine and methadone on mortality: a primary care cohort study in the United Kingdom.丁丙诺啡和美沙酮对死亡率的影响:英国初级保健队列研究。
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1461-1476. doi: 10.1111/add.14188. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
Patterns of regional variation of opioid prescribing in primary care in England: a retrospective observational study.英国初级保健中阿片类药物处方的区域变化模式:一项回顾性观察研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Mar;68(668):e225-e233. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695057. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
High-dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.高剂量阿片类药物用于慢性非癌性疼痛:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012299. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012299.pub2.
10
Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.阿片类药物长期用于慢性非癌性疼痛的相关不良事件:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012509.pub2.