文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

基于初级保健的阿片类药物和疼痛审查服务的可接受性:英格兰的一项混合方法评估。

Acceptability of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in England.

机构信息

NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; South Gloucestershire Council, Bristol.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jan 30;70(691):e120-e129. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706097. Print 2020 Feb.


DOI:10.3399/bjgp19X706097
PMID:31594772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6783137/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary care opioid prescribing to treat chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) has progressively increased despite a lack of evidence for long-term safety and effectiveness. Developing primary care interventions to reduce opioid dependence in patients with CNCP is a public health priority. AIM: To report the acceptability of the South Gloucestershire pain and opioid review service for patients with CNCP, which aimed to help patients understand their relationship with prescribed opioids and support non-drug-based pain management strategies. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed-methods evaluation was performed on the service, which was based in two GP practices in South Gloucestershire, England, and delivered by project workers. METHOD: Descriptive data were collected on delivered-within-service and community-based interventions. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews ( = 18 patients, = 7 service providers) explored experiences of the service. RESULTS: The enrolment process, person-centred primary care-based delivery, and service content focused on psychological issues underlying CNCP were found to be acceptable to patients and service providers. Patients welcomed having time to discuss their pain, its management, and related psychological issues. Maintaining a long-term approach was desired as CNCP is a complex issue that takes time to address. GPs recommended that funding was needed to ensure they have dedicated time to support a similar service and to ensure that project workers received adequate clinical supervision. CONCLUSION: This service model was acceptable and may be a useful means to manage patients with CNCP who develop opioid dependence after long-term use of opioids. A randomised controlled trial is needed to formally test the effectiveness of the service.

摘要

背景:尽管缺乏长期安全性和有效性的证据,初级保健阿片类药物处方治疗慢性非癌症疼痛(CNCP)的情况仍在逐渐增加。制定减少 CNCP 患者阿片类药物依赖的初级保健干预措施是公共卫生的重点。

目的:报告南格洛斯特郡疼痛和阿片类药物审查服务对 CNCP 患者的可接受性,该服务旨在帮助患者了解他们与处方阿片类药物的关系,并支持非药物性疼痛管理策略。

设计和设置:对该服务进行了混合方法评估,该服务位于英格兰南格洛斯特郡的两个全科医生实践中,由项目工作人员提供。

方法:收集了服务内和社区干预措施的交付情况描述性数据。对 25 名半结构化访谈(=18 名患者,=7 名服务提供者)进行了探索性研究,以了解他们对该服务的体验。

结果:患者和服务提供者都认为,该服务的招募流程、以患者为中心的初级保健服务提供方式以及针对 CNCP 潜在心理问题的服务内容是可以接受的。患者欢迎有时间讨论他们的疼痛、疼痛管理以及相关的心理问题。由于 CNCP 是一个复杂的问题,需要时间来解决,因此需要保持长期的治疗方法。全科医生建议需要提供资金,以确保他们有专门的时间来支持类似的服务,并确保项目工作人员获得足够的临床监督。

结论:该服务模式是可以接受的,可能是管理长期使用阿片类药物后出现阿片类药物依赖的 CNCP 患者的一种有用方法。需要进行随机对照试验来正式检验该服务的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/77b801894e10/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/128f1868033f/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/1b5b5fa1cac4/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/77b801894e10/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/128f1868033f/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/1b5b5fa1cac4/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/7018428/77b801894e10/bjgpFeb-2020-70-691-e120-OA-3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Acceptability of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in England.

Br J Gen Pract. 2020-1-30

[2]
Evaluation of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in two GP practices in England.

Br J Gen Pract. 2020-1-30

[3]
GPs prescribing of strong opioid drugs for patients with chronic non-cancer pain: a qualitative study.

Br J Gen Pract. 2013-12

[4]
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks

2025-1

[5]
Health service utilisation by people living with chronic non-cancer pain: findings from the Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study.

Aust Health Rev. 2016-11

[6]
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Survey of Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain in Taiwan-Comparison of Pain and Non-Pain Physicians.

Pain Med. 2019-12-1

[7]
Multimodal Local Opioid Prescribing Intervention Outcomes in Chronic Noncancer Pain Management.

J Am Board Fam Med. 2019

[8]
Sources and Impact of Time Pressure on Opioid Management in the Safety-Net.

J Am Board Fam Med. 2019

[9]
Recommendations for managing adults with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: A systematic clinical guideline review.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025-2

[10]
Perspectives of pain specialists, patients, and family members on long-term opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain: a qualitative study.

BMC Anesthesiol. 2021-11-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Collaboration between adult patients and practitioners when making decisions about prescribing opioid medicines for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a scoping review.

Br J Pain. 2022-2

[2]
A pharmacist-led intervention to improve the management of opioids in a general practice: a qualitative evaluation of participant interviews.

Int J Clin Pharm. 2022-2

[3]
Opioids in the United Kingdom: safety and surveillance during COVID-19.

Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021-7-1

[4]
Analgesic Opioid Misuse and Opioid Use Disorder among Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain and Prescribed Opioids in a Pain Centre in France.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-2-21

[5]
Evaluation of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in two GP practices in England.

Br J Gen Pract. 2020-1-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Evaluation of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in two GP practices in England.

Br J Gen Pract. 2020-1-30

[2]
Opioid prescribing trends and geographical variation in England, 1998-2018: a retrospective database study.

Lancet Psychiatry. 2019-2

[3]
Opioids and chronic pain in primary care.

Br J Gen Pract. 2018-10

[4]
Managing addiction to prescribed opioids: the job of general practice?

Br J Gen Pract. 2018-9

[5]
Delivering a primary care-based social prescribing initiative: a qualitative study of the benefits and challenges.

Br J Gen Pract. 2018-5-21

[6]
Concerns and Help-Seeking Among Patients Using Opioids for Management of Chronic Noncancer Pain.

Pain Med. 2019-4-1

[7]
The impact of buprenorphine and methadone on mortality: a primary care cohort study in the United Kingdom.

Addiction. 2018-4-19

[8]
Patterns of regional variation of opioid prescribing in primary care in England: a retrospective observational study.

Br J Gen Pract. 2018-2-12

[9]
High-dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-30

[10]
Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索