Sunnybrook Research Institute, St. John's Rehab, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute for Better Health, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 6;26:e51878. doi: 10.2196/51878.
Telemedicine in the realm of rehabilitation includes the remote delivery of rehabilitation services using communication technologies (eg, telephone, emails, and video). The widespread application of virtual care grants a suitable time to explore the intersection of compassion and telemedicine, especially due to the impact of COVID-19 and how it greatly influenced the delivery of health care universally.
The purpose of this study was to explore how compassionate care is understood and experienced by physiatrists and patients engaged in telemedicine.
We used a qualitative descriptive approach to conduct interviews with patients and physiatrists between June 2021 and March 2022. Patients were recruited across Canada from social media and from a single hospital network in Toronto, Ontario. Physiatrists were recruited across Canada through social media and the Canadian Association for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (CAPM&R) email listserve. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data were analyzed thematically.
A total of 19 participants were interviewed-8 physiatrists and 11 patients. Two themes capturing physiatrists' and patients' experiences with delivering and receiving compassionate care, especially in the context of virtual care were identified: (1) compassionate care is inherently rooted in health care providers' inner intentions and are, therefore, expressed as caring behaviors and (2) virtual elements impact the delivery and receipt of compassionate care.
Compassionate care stemmed from physiatrists' caring attitudes which then manifest as caring behaviors. In turn, these caring attitudes and behaviors enable individualized care and the establishment of a safe space for patients. Moreover, the virtual care modality both positively and negatively influenced how compassion is enacted by physiatrists and received by patients. Notably, there was large ambiguity around the norms and etiquette surrounding virtual care. Nonetheless, the flexibility and person-centeredness of virtual care cause it to be useful in health care settings.
康复领域的远程医疗包括使用通信技术(如电话、电子邮件和视频)远程提供康复服务。虚拟护理的广泛应用为探索同情和远程医疗的交叉点提供了适当的时间,特别是由于 COVID-19 的影响以及它如何普遍影响医疗保健的提供。
本研究旨在探讨远程医疗中的物理治疗师和患者如何理解和体验同情护理。
我们使用定性描述方法,于 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 3 月期间对患者和物理治疗师进行了访谈。患者通过社交媒体和安大略省多伦多的一家单一医院网络在加拿大各地招募。物理治疗师通过社交媒体和加拿大物理医学与康复协会(CAPM&R)电子邮件列表在加拿大各地招募。访谈进行了录音和转录。使用主题分析对数据进行分析。
共对 19 名参与者进行了访谈-8 名物理治疗师和 11 名患者。确定了两个主题,分别捕捉了物理治疗师和患者在提供和接受同情护理方面的经验,特别是在虚拟护理的背景下:(1)同情护理从根本上植根于医疗保健提供者的内在意图,因此表现为关怀行为,(2)虚拟要素影响同情护理的提供和接收。
同情护理源于物理治疗师的关怀态度,进而表现为关怀行为。反过来,这些关怀态度和行为使个体化护理和为患者建立安全空间成为可能。此外,虚拟护理模式对物理治疗师实施同情和患者接受同情的方式都产生了积极和消极的影响。值得注意的是,虚拟护理的规范和礼仪存在很大的模糊性。尽管如此,虚拟护理的灵活性和以人为中心的特点使其在医疗保健环境中有用。