• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 Twitter 社交网络识别药品短缺:回顾性观察研究。

Identifying Medicine Shortages With the Twitter Social Network: Retrospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, The Hague, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 6;26:e51317. doi: 10.2196/51317.

DOI:10.2196/51317
PMID:39106483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11336501/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early identification is critical for mitigating the impact of medicine shortages on patients. The internet, specifically social media, is an emerging source of health data.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore whether a routine analysis of data from the Twitter social network can detect signals of a medicine shortage and serve as an early warning system and, if so, for which medicines or patient groups.

METHODS

Medicine shortages between January 31 and December 1, 2019, were collected from the Dutch pharmacists' society's national catalog Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP) Farmanco. Posts on these shortages were collected by searching for the name, the active pharmaceutical ingredient, or the first word of the brand name of the medicines in shortage. Posts were then selected based on relevant keywords that potentially indicated a shortage and the percentage of shortages with at least 1 post was calculated. The first posts per shortage were analyzed for their timing (median number of days, including the IQR) versus the national catalog, also stratified by disease and medicine characteristics. The content of the first post per shortage was analyzed descriptively for its reporting stakeholder and the nature of the post.

RESULTS

Of the 341 medicine shortages, 102 (29.9%) were mentioned on Twitter. Of these 102 shortages, 18 (5.3% of the total) were mentioned prior to or simultaneous to publication by KNMP Farmanco. Only 4 (1.2%) of these were mentioned on Twitter more than 14 days before. On average, posts were published with a median delay of 37 (IQR 7-81) days to publication by KNMP Farmanco. Shortages mentioned on Twitter affected a greater number of patients and lasted longer than those that were not mentioned. We could not conclusively relate either the presence or absence on Twitter to a disease area or route of administration of the medicine in shortage. The first posts on the 102 shortages were mainly published by patients (n=51, 50.0%) and health care professionals (n=46, 45.1%). We identified 8 categories of nature of content. Sharing personal experience (n=44, 43.1%) was the most common category.

CONCLUSIONS

The Twitter social network is not a suitable early warning system for medicine shortages. Twitter primarily echoes already-known information rather than spreads new information. However, Twitter or potentially any other social media platform provides the opportunity for future qualitative research in the increasingly important field of medicine shortages that investigates how a larger population of patients is affected by shortages.

摘要

背景

早期识别对于减轻药品短缺对患者的影响至关重要。互联网,特别是社交媒体,是健康数据的新兴来源。

目的

本研究旨在探讨对 Twitter 社交网络数据的常规分析是否可以发现药品短缺的信号,并作为预警系统,如是,对于哪些药品或患者群体适用。

方法

2019 年 1 月 31 日至 12 月 1 日期间,从荷兰药剂师协会的国家目录 Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP) Farmanco 中收集药品短缺信息。通过搜索短缺药品的名称、活性药物成分或品牌名称的首字母来收集短缺信息。然后根据可能表明短缺的相关关键字选择帖子,并计算每个短缺药品的帖子比例。分析每个短缺药品的第一条帖子的时间(包括 IQR 的中位数天数)与国家目录进行对比,同时按疾病和药品特征进行分层。对每个短缺药品的第一条帖子的内容进行描述性分析,分析其报告利益相关者和帖子的性质。

结果

在 341 种药品短缺中,有 102 种(29.9%)在 Twitter 上提到。在这 102 种短缺药品中,有 18 种(占总数的 5.3%)在 KNMP Farmanco 发布之前或同时发布。其中只有 4 种(占 1.2%)在 Twitter 上的提前时间超过 14 天。平均而言,帖子的发布时间比 KNMP Farmanco 发布的时间中位数延迟了 37 天(IQR 7-81)。在 Twitter 上提到的短缺药品影响的患者人数更多,持续时间也更长,而未在 Twitter 上提到的短缺药品则影响的患者人数更少,持续时间也更短。我们无法确定在 Twitter 上的出现或不存在与短缺药品的疾病领域或给药途径有任何关系。这 102 种短缺药品的第一条帖子主要由患者(n=51,50.0%)和医疗保健专业人员(n=46,45.1%)发布。我们确定了 8 种内容性质类别。分享个人经验(n=44,43.1%)是最常见的类别。

结论

Twitter 社交网络不是药品短缺的合适预警系统。Twitter 主要是对已经知道的信息进行回应,而不是传播新信息。然而,Twitter 或潜在的任何其他社交媒体平台都为研究药品短缺这一日益重要的领域中更多患者如何受到短缺影响的未来定性研究提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a1b/11336501/361ba974bf75/jmir_v26i1e51317_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a1b/11336501/6cac78e59783/jmir_v26i1e51317_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a1b/11336501/cedc8705b45a/jmir_v26i1e51317_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a1b/11336501/361ba974bf75/jmir_v26i1e51317_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a1b/11336501/6cac78e59783/jmir_v26i1e51317_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a1b/11336501/cedc8705b45a/jmir_v26i1e51317_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a1b/11336501/361ba974bf75/jmir_v26i1e51317_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Medicine Shortages With the Twitter Social Network: Retrospective Observational Study.利用 Twitter 社交网络识别药品短缺:回顾性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 6;26:e51317. doi: 10.2196/51317.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Drug Shortages at Mediclinic Parkview Hospital: A ‎Five-Year Study of ‎Challenges, Impact, and Strategies.解决米德克林克帕克维尤医院的药品短缺问题:一项关于挑战、影响和策略的五年研究
Cureus. 2024 Dec 25;16(12):e76377. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76377. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicines Shortages Reporting Systems (MSRS): An exploratory review of access and sustainability.药品短缺报告系统(MSRS):对获取和可持续性的探索性综述。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Jun;20(6):72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
2
Medicine shortages: impact behind numbers.药品短缺:数字背后的影响。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Mar 14;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00548-x.
3
Impact of medicine shortages on patients - a framework and application in the Netherlands.药品短缺对患者的影响 - 荷兰的框架和应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 17;22(1):1366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08765-x.
4
Biases in using social media data for public health surveillance: A scoping review.社交媒体数据在公共卫生监测中的应用偏差:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Aug;164:104804. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104804. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Can Twitter posts serve as early indicators for potential safety signals? A retrospective analysis.推特帖子能否作为潜在安全信号的早期指标?一项回顾性分析。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2023;34(1):41-61. doi: 10.3233/JRS-210024.
6
An intelligent early warning system of analyzing Twitter data using machine learning on COVID-19 surveillance in the US.一种利用机器学习分析推特数据以进行美国新冠肺炎监测的智能早期预警系统。
Expert Syst Appl. 2022 Jul 15;198:116882. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116882. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
7
What impact does medicines shortages have on patients? A qualitative study exploring patients' experience and views of healthcare professionals.药品短缺对患者有什么影响?一项定性研究探讨了患者对医护人员的体验和看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06812-7.
8
Early warnings of COVID-19 outbreaks across Europe from social media.社交媒体对欧洲各地 COVID-19 疫情的早期预警。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 25;11(1):2147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81333-1.
9
Analysis of drug shortages across two countries during pre-pandemic and pandemic times.分析两个国家在大流行前和大流行期间的药品短缺情况。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Sep;17(9):1570-1573. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
10
Vulnerability of the medical product supply chain: the wake-up call of COVID-19.医疗产品供应链的脆弱性:新冠疫情的警钟
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Apr;30(4):331-335. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012133. Epub 2020 Nov 2.