Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Aug 15;2024(66):275-281. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad022.
Medical cannabis with cancer as a qualifying condition has become legalized in more states, but currently there are no standardized measures of perceived benefits and harms of cannabis use in cancer. This study surveyed a population-based sample of cancer survivors (n = 1539) with various types of cancer including breast (25%), prostate (17%), and gastrointestinal (11%) cancers. Item response theory analyses were used to evaluate the items for measuring perceived benefits and harms. Item response theory evaluates survey items by estimating the accuracy (analogous to reliability) and severity reflected by each item. Item response theory analyses showed all the items were accurate (reliable) measures of perceived benefits or harms. The perceived benefits items assessed beliefs well from low to high levels of perceived benefits. The perceived harms items assessed beliefs from moderate to high levels of perceived harms. The items can be used in future studies to standardize measurement while allowing some customization.
医用大麻在癌症等病症上的使用已在更多州合法化,但目前尚无标准化的方法来衡量大麻在癌症治疗中的益处和危害。本研究调查了一个基于人群的癌症幸存者样本(n=1539),包括乳腺癌(25%)、前列腺癌(17%)和胃肠道癌(11%)等多种癌症。采用项目反应理论分析评估了用于测量感知益处和危害的项目。项目反应理论通过评估每个项目的准确性(类似于可靠性)和反映的严重程度来评估调查项目。项目反应理论分析表明,所有项目都是感知益处或危害的准确(可靠)衡量标准。感知益处项目从低到高的感知益处水平评估了信念。感知危害项目从中等至高的感知危害水平评估了信念。这些项目可用于未来的研究中,在实现标准化测量的同时允许一定程度的定制化。