Crofton Kevin M, Paparella Martin, Price Anna, Mangas Iris, Martino Laura, Terron Andrea, Hernández-Jerez Antonio
EFSA J. 2024 Aug 6;22(8):e8954. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8954. eCollection 2024 Aug.
The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework serves as a practical tool for organising scientific knowledge that can be used to infer cause-effect relationships between stressor events and toxicity outcomes in intact organisms. However, a major challenge in the broader application of the AOP concept within regulatory toxicology is the development of a robust AOPs that can withstand peer review and acceptance. This is mainly due to the considerable amount of work required to substantiate the modular units of a complete AOP, which can take years from inception to completion. The methodology used here consisted of an initial assessment of a single chemical hazard using the Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) framework. An evidence-based approach was then used to gather empirical evidence combining systematic literature review methods with expert knowledge to ensure the effectiveness of the AOP development methodology. The structured framework used assured transparency, objectivity and comprehensiveness, and included expert knowledge elicitation for the evaluation of key event relationships (KERs). This stepwise approach led to the development of an AOP that begins with binding of chemicals to Voltage Gate Sodium Channels (VGSC/Nav) during mammalian development leading to adverse consequences in neurodevelopment evidenced as deficits in cognitive functions. Disruption of the formation of precise neural circuits by alterations in VGSC kinetics during the perinatal stages of brain development may also underlie neurodevelopmental disorders. Gaps in our understanding include the specific critical developmental windows and the quantitative relationship of binding to VGSC and subsequent disruption and cognitive function. Despite the limited quantitative information at all KER levels, regulatory applications of this AOP for DNT assessment have been identified.
不良结局途径(AOP)框架是一种实用工具,用于组织科学知识,可用于推断完整生物体中应激源事件与毒性结局之间的因果关系。然而,在监管毒理学中更广泛应用AOP概念的一个主要挑战是开发出能够经受同行评审和认可的强大AOP。这主要是由于证实一个完整AOP的模块化单元需要大量工作,从开始到完成可能需要数年时间。这里使用的方法包括使用综合测试与评估方法(IATA)框架对单一化学危害进行初步评估。然后采用基于证据的方法,将系统文献综述方法与专家知识相结合来收集实证证据,以确保AOP开发方法的有效性。所使用的结构化框架确保了透明度、客观性和全面性,并且包括用于评估关键事件关系(KER)的专家知识引出。这种逐步推进的方法促成了一个AOP的开发,该AOP始于哺乳动物发育过程中化学物质与电压门控钠通道(VGSC/Nav)的结合,导致神经发育出现不良后果,表现为认知功能缺陷。在大脑发育的围产期阶段,VGSC动力学改变导致精确神经回路形成受到破坏,这也可能是神经发育障碍的基础。我们理解上的差距包括特定的关键发育窗口以及与VGSC结合、随后的破坏和认知功能之间的定量关系。尽管在所有KER水平上的定量信息有限,但已确定该AOP在DNT评估中的监管应用。